Сравнение открытой, лапароскопической и роботизированной радикальных простатэктомий по клиническим результатам и стоимости лечения (обзор литературы)

Автор: Катибов Магомед Исламбегович, Аполихин Олег Иванович

Журнал: Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России @vestnik-rncrr

Рубрика: Обзоры

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.11, 2011 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Обзор литературы показал, что лапароскопическая и роботизированная методики радикальной простатэктомии не дают преимуществ перед открытой операцией и не приводят к предполагаемым выгодам для пациентов. Различия по основным результатам между видами радикальной простатэктомии являются незначительными и обусловлены меньшими сроками пребывания больных в стационаре, но при этом расходы на выполнение лапароскопической и роботизированной операций значительно выше, чем на выполнение открытой операции. Полученные данные свидетельствуют, что результаты любого вмешательства в большей степени зависят от способностей хирурга, чем от методики выполнения радикальной простатэктомии. С учетом отсутствия существенных преимуществ малоинвазивных методик, короткого периода кривой обучения, полученных отдаленных результатов и низких затрат на лечение открытая техника по-прежнему остается «золотым стандартом» радикального хирургического лечения рака предстательной железы.

Еще

Рак предстательной железы, радикальная простатэктомия, лапароскопическая простатэктомия, роботизированная простатэктомия

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14955264

IDR: 14955264

Список литературы Сравнение открытой, лапароскопической и роботизированной радикальных простатэктомий по клиническим результатам и стоимости лечения (обзор литературы)

  • Middleton R.G., Thompson I.M., Austenfeld M.S. et al. Prostate cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. The American Urological Association//J. Urol. -1995. -Vol. 154, N 6. -P. 2144-2148.
  • Bivalacqua T.J., Pierorazio P.M., Su L.M. Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach//Surg. Oncol. -2009. -Vol. 18, N 3. -P. 233-241.
  • Parsons J.K., Bennett J.L. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy//Urology. -2008. -Vol. 72, N 2. -P. 412-416.
  • Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G. et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 177, N 3. -Р. 929-931.
  • Poulakis V., Witzsch U., de Vries R. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men//Eur. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 51, N 5. -Р. 1341-1348.
  • Artibani W., Grosso G., Novara G. et al. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy//Eur. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 44, N 4. -Р. 401-406.
  • Touijer K., Eastham J.A., Secin F.P. et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005//J. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 179, N 5. -Р. 1811-1817.
  • Salomon L., Levrel O., de la Taille A. et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center//Eur. Urol. -2002. -Vol. 42, N 2. -Р. 104-110.
  • Hu J.C., Nelson R.A., Wilson T.G. et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 175, N 2. -Р. 541-546.
  • Menon M., Tewari A., Baize B. et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience//Urology. -2002. -Vol. 60, N 5. -Р. 864-868.
  • Bhayani S.B., Pavlovich C.P., Hsu T.S. et al. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy//Urology. -2003. -Vol. 61, N 3. -Р. 612-616.
  • Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 3. -Р. 912-914.
  • Tewari A., Menon M. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results//Curr. Urol. Rep. -2003. -Vol. 4, N 2. -P. 119-123.
  • Han M., Partin A. W., Pound C. R. et al. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience//Urol. Clin. North Am. -2001. -Vol. 28, N 3. -P. 555-565.
  • Lepor H., Nieder A. M., Ferrandino M. N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases//J. Urol. -2001. -Vol. 166, N 5. -P. 1729-1733.
  • Augustin H., Pummer K., Daghofer F. et al. Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy//Eur. Urol. -2002. -Vol. 42, N 2. -Р. 112-117.
  • Roehl K.A., Han M., Ramos C.G. et al. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results//J. Urol. -2004. -Vol. 172, N 3. -Р. 910-914.
  • Bianco F.J. Jr., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta")//Urology. -2005. -Vol. 66, N 5 (Suppl.). -Р. 83-94.
  • Saranchuk J.W., Kattan M.W., Elkin E. et al. Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy//J. Clin. Oncol. -2005. -Vol. 23, N 18. -Р. 4146-4151.
  • Chun F.K., Graefen M., Zacharias M. et al. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer//World J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 24, N 3. -Р. 273-280.
  • Porter C.R., Kodama K., Gibbons R.P. et al. 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series//J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 176, N 2. -Р. 569-574.
  • Sacco E., Prayer-Galetti T., Pinto F. et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up//BJU Int. -2006. -Vol. 97, N 6. -Р. 1234-1241.
  • Велиев Е.И. Оптимизация хирургического лечения больных локализованным раком предстательной железы: Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. -СПб., 2003. -348 с.
  • Ракул С.А. Рак предстательной железы: диагностика, результаты хирургического лечения и качество жизни: Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. -СПб., 2009. -309 с.
  • Brown J.A., Garlitz C., Gomella L.G. et al. Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens//Urology. -2003. -Vol. 62, N 3. -Р. 481-486.
  • Khan M.A., Partin A.W. Surgical margin status after radical retropubic prostatectomy//BJU Int. -2005. -Vol. 95, N 3. -Р. 281-284.
  • Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19185977//Eur. Urol. -2009. -Vol. 55, N 5. -P. 1037-1063.
  • Ahlering T.E., Woo D., Eichel L. et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes//Urology. -2004. -Vol. 63, N 5. -Р. 819-822.
  • Smith J.A. Jr., Chan R.C., Chang S.S. et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 178, N 6. -P. 2385-2389.
  • Krambeck A.E., DiMarco D.S., Rangel L.J. et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques//BJU Int. -2009. -Vol. 103, N 4. -Р. 448-453.
  • DiMarco D.S., Ho K.L., Leibovich B.C. Early complications and surgical margin status following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP) compared to robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 173, N 1. -P. 277.
  • Rozet F., Galiano M., Cathelineau X. et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 3. -Р. 908-911.
  • Joseph J.V., Vicente I., Madeb R. et al. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int. -2005. -Vol. 96, N 1. -Р. 39-42.
  • Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Doublet J.D. et al. Laparoscopic prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures//Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. -2002. -Vol. 43, N 2. -P. 123-133.
  • Rassweiler J., Stolzenburg J., Sulser T. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy-the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group//Eur. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 49, N 1. -Р. 113-119.
  • Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results//Eur. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 51, N 3. -Р. 648-57.
  • Murphy D.G., Challacombe B.J., Costello A.J. Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy//Asian J. Androl. -2009. -Vol. 11, N 1. -Р. 94-99.
  • Kao T. C., Cruess D. F., Garner D. et al. Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2000. -Vol. 163, N 3. -P. 858-864.
  • Stanford J.L., Feng Z., Hamilton A.S. et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study//JAMA. -2000. -Vol. 283, N 3. -Р. 354-360.
  • Graefen M., Walz.J, Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy//Eur. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 49, N 1. -Р. 38-48.
  • Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Créteil experience//Eur. Urol. -2001. -Vol. 40, N 1. -Р. 38-45.
  • Djavan B., Eckersberger E., Finkelstein J. et al. Oncologic, functional, and cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy//Eur. Urol. Suppl. -2010. -Vol. 9, N 3. -Р. 371-378.
  • Anastasiadis A.G., Salomon L., Katz R. et al. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome//Urology. -2003. -Vol. 62, N 2. -Р. 292-297.
  • Stolzenburg J.U., Rabenalt R., Dо M. et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 4 (Pt. 1). -Р. 1271-1275.
  • Su L.M., Link R.E., Bhayani S.B. et al. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique//Urology. -2004. -Vol. 64, N 1. -Р. 123-127.
  • Katz R., Salomon L., Hoznek A. et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2002. -Vol. 168, N 5. -Р. 2078-2082.
  • Rassweiler J., Seemann O., Schulze M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution//J. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 169, N 5. -Р. 1689-1693.
  • Curto F., Benijts J., Pansadoro A. et al. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique//Eur. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 49, N 2. -Р. 344-352.
  • Türk I., Deger S., Winkelmann B. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases//Eur. Urol. -2001. -Vol. 40, N 1. -Р. 46-52.
  • Wagner A.A., Link R.E., Trock B.J. et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcomes from a surgeon's early experience//Urology. -2007. -Vol. 70, N 4. -Р. 667-671.
  • Schwab II C.W., Fabrizio M.D., Given R.W. Prospective longitudinal comparison of health related quality of life in patients undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer: an evaluation of three surgical treatment modalities from a single institution//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 177, N 1. -Р. 7.
  • Lepor H., McCullough A., Engel J.D. Renewing intimacy: advances in treating erectile dysfunction postprostatectomy//Rev. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 10, N 4. -Р. 245-253.
  • Joseph J.V., Rosenbaum R., Madeb R. et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach//J. Urol. -2006. -Vol. 175, N 3 (Pt. 1). -Р. 945-950.
  • Hara I., Kawabata G., Miyake H. et al. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer//J. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 169, N 6. -Р. 2045-2048.
  • Namiki S., Egawa S., Terachi T. et al. Changes in quality of life in first year after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, laparoscopic, and perineal approach: Multi-institutional longitudinal study in Japan//Urology. -2006. -Vol. 67, N 2. -Р. 321-327.
  • Медведев В.Л. Сравнительный анализ открытой и лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии в лечении локального рака предстательной железы: Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. -М., 2004. -50 с.
  • Eden C.G., Cahill D., Vass J.A. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series//BJU Int. -2002. -Vol. 90, N 9. -Р. 876-882.
  • Roumeguere T., Bollens R., Vanden Bossche M. et al. Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches//World J. Urol. -2003. -Vol. 20, N 6. -Р. 360-366.
  • Miller J., Smith A., Kouba E. et al. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2007. -Vol. 178, N 3 (Pt. 1). -Р. 854-858.
  • Ball A.J., Gambill B., Fabrizio M.D. et al. Prospective longitudinal comparative study of early health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer: a short-term evaluation of five approaches from a single institution//J. Endourol. -2006. -Vol. 20, N 10. -Р. 723-731.
  • Frota R., Turna B., Barros R., Gill I.S. Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted//Int. Braz. J. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 34, N 3. -Р. 259-268.
  • Patel H.R., Linares A., Joseph J.V. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training//Surg. Oncol. -2009. -Vol. 18, N 3. -P. 242-246.
  • Klein E.A., Bianco F.J., Serio A.M. et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories//J. Urol. -2008. -Vol. 179, N 6. -Р. 2212-2216.
  • Badani K.K., Kaul S., Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures//Cancer. -2007. -Vol. 110, N 9. -Р. 1951-1958.
  • Touijer K., Secin F.P., Cronin A.M. et al. Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience//Eur. Urol. -2009. -Vol. 55, N 5. -Р. 1014-1019.
  • Eastham J., Tokuda Y., Scardino P. Trends in radical prostatectomy//Int. J. Urol. -2009. -Vol. 16, N 2. -P. 151-160.
  • Link R.E., Su L.M., Bhayani S.B., Pavlovich C.P. Making ends meet: a cost comparison of laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2004. -Vol. 172, N 1. -P. 269-274.
  • Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Gettman M.T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques//J. Urol. -2004. -Vol. 172, N 4 (Pt. 1). -P. 1431-1435.
  • Anderson J.K., Murdock A., Cadeddu J.A., Lotan Y. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy//Urology. -2005. -Vol. 66, N 3. -P. 557-560.
  • Scales C.D. Jr., Jones P.J., Eisenstein E.L. et al. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy//J. Urol. -2005. -Vol. 174, N 6. -P. 2323-2329.
  • Mouraviev V., Nosnik I., Sun L., Robertson C.N. et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience//Urology. -2007. -Vol. 69, N 32. -P. 311-314.
  • Bolenz C., Gupta A., Hotze T., Ho R. et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer//Eur. Urol. -2010. -Vol. 57, N 3. -Р. 453-458.
Еще
Статья обзорная