Modern development of the system of cities in Russia: static and dynamic approaches

Автор: Rastvortseva Svetlana N., Manaeva Inna V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Regional economy

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article raises the issues of urban transformation. The provisions of the new economic geography state that large cities get agglomeration effects from overcrowding, businesses and amenities. But practice shows that medium and small cities often have more prospects for development. Borrowed size (the location of a small or medium-sized city or settlement near a larger one) allows residents to use some of the services of neighboring cities without incurring the associated costs. The possibility of borrowing agglomeration advantages is forming a new system of cities. The distribution of population and economic activity does not always occur around administrative centers, there is a polycentricity of spatial development. To analyze the system of cities we proposed to use static and dynamic approaches that allow us to determine more fully the reasons for the attractiveness of cities and population growth. We constructed a system of econometric models of the influence of high order urban functions - factors of economy, education, culture and sports - on the number of residents of cities in the Central Federal District of Russia as a whole and by size categories. The analysis of polycentricity of cities revealed that a high level of the indicator is observed in the Moscow, Vladimir, Belgorod, Tula, Tver and Kaluga oblasts, and low polycentricity is in the Lipetsk, Ryazan, Voronezh and Orel oblasts. It was determined that the attractiveness of cities and the growth of their population are influenced by high-order urban functions (business, science, sports and culture), the ability to take advantage of “borrowed” size, the external effects of the urban network and the level of inter-city cooperation. The most significant factor in the growth of the city is the number of schools. The second factor is the possibility for children and adolescents to join sports clubs. Budget expenditures have a positive impact on the growth of large, big and small cities. Cultural and recreational activities are significant for the attractiveness of cities with a population of up to 10 thousand people and from 15 to 20 thousand people. It was revealed that more than a half of settlements in the Central Federal District are cities and urban-type settlements with population less than 10 thousand people. For this group, all the considered development factors are statistically significant and important. The results can be used to further develop the ideas of static and dynamic analysis to assess the reasons for the attractiveness of cities, substantiate the “borrowed size factor”, and determine general trends in the system of cities formation. The practical value of the work lies in a better understanding of the principles for creating an attractive city for residents at different stages and conditions of its development; it can be used in the development of appropriate socio-economic programs at the city and regional levels.

Еще

Borrowed city size, high-order urban functions, polycentricity of the city system, agglomeration effects, cities and regions of Russia

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147240259

IDR: 147240259   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.1.85.3

Список литературы Modern development of the system of cities in Russia: static and dynamic approaches

  • Albouy D. (2009). What are cities worth? Land rents, local productivity, and the value of amenities. NBER WP, 14981, 25.
  • Becattini G. (1989). Modelli locali di sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  • Blomqvist G., Berger M., Hoehn J. (1988). New estimates of the quality of life in urban areas. Am Econ Rev, 78(1), 89–107.
  • Boschma R.A., Iammarino S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Econ Geogr, 85(3), 289–311.
  • Buvin A.A., Khabarov V.I. (2022). Economic aspects of digitalization in healthcare in Russia. Ploblemy teorii i practiki uptavlenia=International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 1, 26–39. DOI: 10.46486/0234-4505-2022-01-26-39 (in Russian).
  • Camagni R. (1991). Technological change, uncertainty and innovation networks: towards a dynamic theory of economic space. In: Camagni R. (Ed.). Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter.
  • Camagni R., Capello R., Caragliu A. (2017). Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies: Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth. In: Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics. Cham: Springer.
  • Capello R. (2009). Indivisibilities, synergy and proximity: The need for an integrated approach to agglomeration economies. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie (TESG), 100(2), 145–159.
  • Carlino G. (1980). Contrast in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh reconsidered. Urban Stud, 17(3), 343–351.
  • Carlino J., Saiz A. (2008). Beautiful city: Leisure amenities and urban growth. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper SSRN-1280157.
  • Cheshire P., Sheppard S. (2002). The welfare economics of land use planning. J Urban Econ, 52(2), 242–269.
  • Chinitz B. (1961). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc, 51(2), 279–289.
  • Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Glaeser E.L. (2011). Triumph of the City. New York: Penguin Press.
  • Henderson J.V. (1985). Economic Theory and the Cities. Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Henderson J.V. (2010). Cities and development. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 515–540.
  • Hoogerbrugge M.M., Burger M.J., Van Oort F.G. (2022). Spatial structure and subjective well-being in North-West Europe. Regional Studies, 56(1), 75–86.
  • Kolomak E.A. (2022). The contradictory effects of heterogeneous market potential on Russian urban development. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya=Region: Economics and Sociology, 2(114), 228–255. DOI: 10.15372/REG20220210 (in Russian).
  • Krugman P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Ma: The MIT Press.
  • Liu K., Xue Y., Chen Z. et al. (2022). Economic spatial structure of China’s urban agglomerations: Regional differences, distribution dynamics, and convergence. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104253.
  • Martin P., Mayer T., Mayneris F. (2011). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. J Urban Econ, 69(2), 182–195.
  • Meichang W., Bingbing Z. (2020). Examining the impact of polycentric urban form on air pollution: Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 43359–43371. DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-10216-1
  • Meijers E., Hoogerbrugge M., Cardoso R. (2018). Beyond polycentricity: Does stronger integration between cities in polycentric urban regions improve performance? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 109(1), 1–21.
  • Meijers E.J., Burger M.J., Hoogerbrugge M.M. (2016). Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), 181–198.
  • Rastvortseva S.N, Manaeva I.V. (2022a). Modern development of small and medium-sized cities: Trends and drivers. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(1), 110–127. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.1.79 (in Russian).
  • Rastvortseva S.N, Manaeva I.V. (2022b). Static and dynamic approaches to assessing the economics of agglomeration taking into account the spatial factor: A review of research. In: Kondratev D.V., Pavlov K.V., Osipov A.K. (Eds.) Upravlenie effektivnost’yu i bezopasnost'yu deyatel'nosti khozyaistvuyushchikh sub”ektov i publichnykh obrazovanii: mat-ly Mezhdunar. nauchno-prakt. konf. 25 yanvarya 2022 g. [Management of Efficiency and Safety of Economic Entities and Public Entities: Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference, January 25, 2022]. Izhevsk: Shelest.
  • Rastvortseva S.N. (2013). Upravlenie razvitiem protsessov kontsentratsii ekonomicheskoi aktivnosti v regione: podkhody novoi ekonomicheskoi geografii [Management of the Development of Economic Activity Concentration Processes in the Region: Approaches of New Economic Geography]. Moscow: Ekon-inform.
  • Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C. (2001). The determinants of agglomeration. J Urban Econ, 50(2), 191–229.
  • Shkiotov S., Markin M. (2020). A model for measuring the impact of productivity and quality of life on national competitiveness. Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness, 1(1), 20–34. Available at: http://jraic.com/index.php/tor/article/view/5
  • Smirnov O.O., Bezverbnyi V.A. (2022). Potential for developing sectors of the economy of small cities in Russia: Modern trends. Sotsium i vlast’=Society and Power, 1(91), 62–74. DOI: 10.22394/1996-0522-2022-1-62-74 (in Russian).
  • Storper M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur Urban Reg Stud, 2(3), 191–221.
Еще
Статья научная