From a Robinson Crusoe economy to a pure exchange economy

Автор: Nekipelov Aleksandr D.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.14, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The pure exchange model is considered as the first stage of the analysis of a simple exchange economy; at that, the research is based on the patterns of behavior of the “economic man” that were identified while studying the Robinson Crusoe model. The interpretation at this stage of production as an exogenous factor helps to determine in “pure form” the forces leading to the formation of exchange relations, to introduce into analysis and to reveal basic features of the main phenomena and processes in the sphere of circulation. Proceeding from well-known approaches to the impact of redistribution of the initial bundle of goods on the individual well-being of members of society, we pay considerable attention to the difference between the exchange of bundles of goods and the exchange of individual goods, the two possible forms of exchange that implement such redistribution. While studying the market form of exchange, we additionally analyze the known options for achieving general equilibrium - on the basis of equilibrium and a series of non-equilibrium proportions of exchange. We show that due to institutional reasons, competition between the participants of the exchange, as a tool for reducing transaction costs, cannot eliminate the costs completely; therefore, the path of moving toward the contract surface inevitably turns out to be multi-stage, accompanied by the use of non-equilibrium proportions of exchange. But the final (limit) point on this path will necessarily be a point of general equilibrium, and the number of such points that can be reached from the initial position is infinitely large. The latter is explained by the multitude of proportions of exchange that can be used by its participants at each of the nodal points of the path. The paper develops our viewpoint formulated in an earlier publication: the possibility of introducing credit relations into the analysis at this stage is associated with the existence of consumer goods of long-term use. At the same time, only the goods of long-term use can serve as the object of the credit and it is impossible to single out an "interest rate component" in the supplies that ensure the repayment of the credit.

Еще

Robinson crusoe model, exchange economy, economic institutions, exchange, pure exchange, exchange value, credit, interest rate

Короткий адрес: https://readera.org/147236304

IDR: 147236304   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.6.78.2

Список литературы From a Robinson Crusoe economy to a pure exchange economy

  • Nekipelov A.D. Stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie ekonomicheskikh institutov. Ot “robinzonady” do rynochnoi ekonomiki, osnovannoi na individual'nom proizvodstve [Formation and Functioning of Economic Institutions. From a Robinson Crusoe Economy to a Market Economy Based on Individual Production]. Moscow: Ekonomist", 2006.
  • 2. Nekipelov A.D. The Robinson Crusoe model as a starting point of pure economic theory. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody=Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 5–20 (in Russian).
  • Nekipelov A.D. The crisis in economics – nature and ways to overcome it. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk=Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 24–37 (in Russian).
  • Rostow W.W. The stages of economic growth. The Economic History Review, New Series, 1959, no. 12 (1).
  • Marx K. Capital. 1867. In: Marx K., Engels F. Soch. 2-e izd. [Works. Second edition]. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury. Moscow, 1961. Vol. 23 (in Russian).
  • Nash Jr J.F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 1950, no. 18 (2), рр. 155–162.
  • Silberberg E. The Structure of Economics. A Mathematical Analysis. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1990.
  • Walras L. Éléments d'économie politique pure ou théorie de la richesse sociale. L. Corbaz & cie., 1874.
  • McKenzie L.W. On equilibrium in Graham’s model of world trade and other competitive systems. Econometrica, 1954, no. 2 (2), рр. 147–161.
  • Arrow K.J., Debreu G. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 1954, no. 22 (3), рр. 265–290.
  • Sonnenschein H. Market excess-demand functions. Econometrica, 1972, no. 40 (3), рр. 549–563.
  • Sonnenschein H. Do Walras’ identity and continuity characterize the class of community demand functions? Journal of Economic Theory, 1973, no. 6 (4), рр. 345–354.
  • Mantel R. On the characterization of aggregate excess-demand. Journal of Economic Theory, 1974, no. 7 (3), рр. 348–353.
  • Debreu G. Excess-demand functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1974, n. 1, рр. 15–21.
  • Debreu G. Economies with a finite set of equilibria. Econometrica, 1970, no. 38 (3), рр. 387–392.
  • Dierker E., Dierker H. The local uniqueness of equilibria. Econometrica, 1972, no. 40 (5), рр. 867–881.
  • Ackerman F. Still dead after all these years: Interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2002, no. 9 (2), рр. 119–139.
  • Fisher F.M. Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics. Econometric Society Monographs. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • Hahn F. On the stability of pure exchange equilibrium. In: “On Some Equilibrium Growth Paths” in Models of Economic Growth. 1973
  • Katzner D.W. An Introduction to the Economic Theory of Market Behavior. Microeconomics from a Walrasian Perspective. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2006.
  • Kreps D. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton University Press, 1990.
  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M., Green J. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • Nekipelov A. Toward the theory of credit and interest rate. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody=Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2021, no. 57 (2), pp. 5–20 (in Russian).
  • Böhm-Bawerk E. Capital and Interest, a Critical History of Economical Theory. London and New York: Macmillan and Co., 1890.
  • Fisher I. The Theory of Interest. New York: August M. Kelley, 1970.
  • Strotz R. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 1956, no. 23 (3).
Еще
Статья научная