Analysis of deindustrialization trends in Turkiye from an international comparative perspective

Analysis of deindustrialization trends in Turkiye from an international comparative perspective

Автор: Uzsayilir A., Baycan T.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Global experience

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In this study, deindustrialization was examined within the international political economy approach, and comparative analyzes were made to explain the deindustrialization trends in selected countries, especially in Turkiye. According to the results, deindustrialization, as a developed country phenomenon that started to decline at the peak of industrial productivity and caused an increase in the service sector, spread to developing countries mainly after the 1990s, with the global restructuring of labor through the neoliberalizm. It has created an effect of industrialization in some of the developing economies and deindustrialization in others. It can be argued that the global effects of deindustrialization in developing countries are closely related to the economic policies of the nations before they entered the deindustrialization process. For example, Turkiye’s main distinguishing aspect is the rapid transition from import substitution policies to a free market economy, while industrial development is still ongoing. As a result, it can be argued that Turkiye entered the process of premature deindustrialization in employment in terms of a direct transition from agriculture to the service sector and the inability of the service sector to absorb the labor force emerging from agriculture and industry, but this is a non-structural phase that can be overcome with alternative socioeconomic and spatial planning.

Еще

Deindustrialization, globalization, political economy, comparative analyzes

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241622

IDR: 147241622   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.16

Список литературы Analysis of deindustrialization trends in Turkiye from an international comparative perspective

  • Alderson A.S. (1999). Explaining deindustrialization: Globalization, failure, or success? American Sociological Review, 64(5), 701–721. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2657372.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A6b172838fd63edcb812f558ef104b761
  • Amin S. (1991). The ancient world-systems versus the modern capitalist world-system, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 14(3), 349–385. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241188?seq=5#metadata_info_tab_contents
  • Amin S. (2018 [1988]). Avrupa-Merkezcilik, Bir İdeolojinin Eleştirisi. Yordam Kitap, İstanbul. İlk basım: 1988, Paris.
  • Ayik U. (2018). Ekonomi politikalarının Bir Yansıması Olarak Sanayisizleşme ve Mekânsal Değişim. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Coğrafya Anabilim Dalı, Tez Danışmanı: Prof.Dr. Sedat Avcı. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332268649
  • Ayik U., Avcı S. (2018). Ekonomik ve Mekânsal Boyutlarıyla Sanayisizleşme, TÜCAUM 30. Yıl Uluslararası Coğrafya Sempozyumu Kitabı, 1276–1288. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330688312
  • Bakır E., Özçelik E., Özmen E., Taşıran A.C. (2019). Türkiye’de Erken Sanayisizleşme. Geçmişten Geleceğe Türkiye Ekonomisi; Fikret Şenses’e Armağan içinde, Derleyenler: Murat Koyuncu, Hakan Mıhcı, A. Erinç Yeldan, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. İlk basım.
  • Baycan-Levent T. (2005). Globalization and development strategies for Istanbul: Regional policies and great urban transformation projects. In: la Greca P. (Ed.). Planning in a More Globalized and Competitive World. ISOCARP.
  • Bluestone B. (1984). Is deindustrialization a myth? Capital mobility versus absorptive capacity in the U.S. economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Deindustrialization: Restructuring the Economy, 475, 39–51. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1043546.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A0e6ef85328737ab66d75fdebc8d03b75
  • Braudel F. (2017 [1949]). AKDENİZ; II. Felipe Döneminde Akdeniz ve Akdeniz Dünyası I. Çeviren: Mehmet Ali Kılıçbay, Doğubatı Yayınları, 2017 Ankara. İlk basım 1949, Paris.
  • Clark C. (1940). The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmillan. Available at: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.223779
  • Dasgupta S., Singh A. (2006). Manufacturing, Services and Premature Deindustrialization in Developing Countries; A Kaldorian Analysis. Available at: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/rp2006-49.pdf
  • Doğruel A.S, Doğruel F. (2018). Two phases of deindustrialization policies in Istanbul “İstanbul’da Sanayisizleşme Politikalarının İki Safhası”, Marmara İktisat Dergisi. Journal of Research in Economics, 2(2), 186–201. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/594432
  • Doğruel A.S., Doğruel F. (2019). Küreselleşme, Unutulan Sanayi Politikaları ve Sanayisizleşme. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 1, 209–230. Available at: https://www.calismatoplum.org/makale/kuresellesme-unutulan-sanayi-politikalarive-sanayisizlesme
  • Ficher A.G.B. (1939). Production, Primary, Secondary and Tertiary. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1939.tb01015.x
  • Frank A.G. (2010 [1998]). Yeniden Doğu; Asya Çağında Küresel Ekonomi. Çeviren: Kâmil Kurtul, İmge Kitabevi, İstanbul. İlk basım: 1998, University of California Press.
  • Kaldor N. (1966). Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://dokumen.pub/causes-of-the-slow-rate-of-economic-growth-of-the-united-kingdom-an-inaugural-lecture.html
  • Kepenek Y. (1999). Türkiye’nin 1980 Sonrası Sanayileşme Süreci. 75 yılda Çarklardan ‘Chip’lere içinde. Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul, Sf. 229-240.
  • Keyder Ç. (2014). İkinci bölüm; İstanbul’da Emek ve Ekonomi Sunuş yazısı. Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları; Sınırlar, Mücadeleler, Açılımlar. Hazırlayanlar: Ayfer Bartu Candan, Cenk Özbay, Metis Yayınları, 1. Basım, İstanbul.
  • Kollmeyer C. (2009a). Explaining deindustrialization: How affluence, productivity growth, and globalization diminish manufacturing employment, American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), May, 1644–1674. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.1086/597176.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A376542acf3937ffb3ad08737029db525
  • Kollmeyer C. (2009b). Consequences of North-South trade for affluent countries: A new application of unequal exchange theory. Review of International Political Economy, 16(5), December, 803–826. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27756195.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A7f14ae982a99664bdc020f19b26fde40
  • Kolsuz G., Yeldan A.E. (2014). 1980 Sonrası Türkiye Ekonomisinde Büyümenin Kaynaklarının Ayrıştırılması. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1, 49–66. Available at: http://calismatoplum.org/sayi40/kolsuz.pdf
  • Kornev A. (2022). How the Russian economy can grow based on its reindustrialization. Russian Social Science Review, 63(1–3), 80–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611428.2022.2111174
  • Köse Z., Dineri E. (2020). Sanayisizleşmeyi Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Türkiye Örneği. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(20), 579–597. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346563131
  • Krugman P. (1988). Deindustrialization, Reindustrialization, and the Real Exchange Rate, Working Paper No. 2586. Cambridge, MA. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w2586/w2586.pdf
  • Krugman P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. Available at: https://pr.princeton.edu/pictures/g-k/krugman/krugman-increasing_returns_1991.pdf (accessed: November 2, 2022).
  • Kurşuncu H. (2016). Türkiye'de Sanayi Sektöründe Yaşanan Dönüşümlerin İstanbul Kentinde Farklı Ortaya Çıkış Biçimleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Anabilimdalı, Tez Danışmanı: Prof.Dr. Hatice Kurtuluş. Available at: https://www.eskop.com/images/UserFiles/Documents/Editor/sanayisizles%CC%A7me.pdf
  • Kuznets S.S. (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. The American Economic Review, 63(3), 247–258. Available at: http://www.piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Kuznets1973.pdf
  • Lorenzi J.H., Berrebi M. (2016). Chapter 4: The impact of deindustrialization. In: A Violent World. Modern Threats to Economic Stability. Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-137-58993-4.pdf
  • Marshall A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Available at: https://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/Marshall,%20Principles%20of%20Economics.pdf
  • Meçik O., Aytun U. (2018). Türkiye ekonomisinde erken sanayisizleşmeye bölgesel bir yaklaşım. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 45, 59–81. Available at: https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/58152/980-6118-1-PB.pdf
  • Öz S. (2018). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Sanayisizleşme. EAF Ekonomik Araştırma Forumu, Araştırma Notu 18–03. Available at: https://eaf.ku.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/eaf_an1803.pdf
  • Prebisch R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Available at: http://archivo.cepal.org/pdfs/cdPrebisch/002.pdf
  • Rodrik D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21, 1–33. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10887-015-9122-3.pdf
  • Rostow W.W. (1959). The stages of economic growth. The Economic History Review, 12(1), 1–16. Available at: https://www.ufjf.br/oliveira_junior/files/2009/06/rostow.pdf
  • Rowthorn R. Wells J. (1987). De-Industrialization and Foreign Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rowthorn R., Ramaswamy R. (1997). Deindustrialization – its causes and implications. International Monetary Fund, Economic Issues, 10. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228288050_Deindustrialization_Its_Causes_and_Implications
  • Ryazanov V. (2018). Turn to new industrialization: The world economy and Russia. In: Proceedings of the Third International Economic Symposium. DOI: 10.2991/ies-18.2019.5. Available at: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ies-18/125924746
  • Şenses F. (2004). Neoliberal Küreselleşme Kalkınma için Bir Fırsat mı, Engel mi? Middle East Technical University ERC Working Paper in Economic, 4(9), 1–27. Available at: https://erc.metu.edu.tr/en/system/files/menu/series04/0409.pdf
  • Şıklar I., Tonus O. (2007). Is it possible to deindustrialize before industrialization? The Turkish case. Economicky Caposis, 55(6), 594–611. Available at: https://earsiv.anadolu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11421/18860
  • Yanıkkaya H., Altun A., Tat P. (2019). Openness and deindustrialization: A Turkish case. Bogazici Journal, 33(2), 140–164. Available at: http://www.bujournal.boun.edu.tr/_uploads/33_2_4.pdf
  • Yeldan E. (2006). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Türkiye Ekonomisi; Bölüşüm, Birikim ve Büyüme. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. İlk basım 2001.
  • Yeldan E. (2011). Neoliberalizmin İdeolojik Bir Söylemi Olarak Küreselleşme. İktisat Üzerine Yazılar I Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar, Korkut Boratav’a Armağan içinde, Derleyenler: A.H. Köse, F. Şenses, E. Yeldan, İletişim Yayınları, 429–453. İlk basım 2003.
  • Yeldan E., Yıldırım D. (2015). Küreselleşme ve Sanayisizleşme Bağlamında Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Demokrasi Açığı. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 2, 65–87.
  • Yücebaş E. (2014). Yeni Bölgeselleşme Paradigması ve Sanayisizleşme: İzmir Örneği. Doktora Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, Kamu Yönetimi Programı, Tez Danışmanı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Şermin Atak. Available at: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=BLdcFtILoyc4-uo3Xe_leA&no=S4xDYm8FpZpHu9UrAkuz8g
  • Zuenko I. (2020). Russia–China cooperation: A view from the region. Russian Politics & Law. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611940.2020.1835069
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©