Vox populi - vox dei: elections in the Roman Republic and modern democracies (comparative analysis)

Автор: Smorchkov A.M., Fedorchenko S.N., Shkarenkov P.P.

Журнал: Новый исторический вестник @nivestnik

Рубрика: Европа в прошлом

Статья в выпуске: 66, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article provides a comparative analysis of ancient and modern technologies for the legitimation of political power, using the example of the Roman Republic and the currently existing democracies. The focus is on the electoral procedure that unites to the utmost the direct (in ancient times) and representative (in modern times) democratic systems. In ancient Rome, in legitimating the electoral procedure the predominant role was played by religious acts, viz. two divination procedures to reveal the will of the gods (auspicia). One was held right before an election and the other during its course, ending with the annunciation of the voting result (renuntiatio). This was the key act in the procedure of electing new magistrates, without which an election was considered invalid regardless of its actual result. The procedure of announcing the voting results actually retains the ritual function of legitimation in modern democracies as well. This mission is assigned, as a rule, to representatives of the election commissions. In the modern world, the ancient Roman religious rituals have an analogy in the form of public opinion polls and political forecasts on the eve of elections which have acquired a ritual legitimizing character in modern democracies. During elections in ancient Rome, a decisive influence on the voting results was exerted by drawing of lots which determined the sequence for casting votes. Modern states, too, try to enhance their legitimation by introducing the aleatory (by lot) form of democratic procedures. Thus, the methods of legitimation of ancient and modern democracies have a certain similarity in the ritual support of the electoral process and in the preservation of the practice of choosing by lot in the electoral procedure. But the legitimating practices of modern democracy have been supplemented with the foreign policy factor, which did not exist in ancient Rome. Also, there was no powerful information pressure in the Roman Republic as there was no media. Today’s democracy is increasingly metamorphosing into mediacracy - a form of government where the interests of political actors are closely intertwined with the interests of media conglomerates.

Еще

Roman republic, elections, legitimation, democracy, ritual, media, aleatory procedure

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149127397

IDR: 149127397

Список литературы Vox populi - vox dei: elections in the Roman Republic and modern democracies (comparative analysis)

  • 1 Дементьева В.В. Жребий как античный политико-правовой инстру- мент: к дискуссии о возможности его рецепции // Pentecontaetia: Иссле- дования по античной истории и культуре. Санкт-Петербург, 2018. С. 346.
  • Liv. IV. 7. 3 (cp. Dionys. XI. 62. 1); V. 17. 2–4; VI. 27. 5; 38. 9–10; VIII. 15. 6; 17. 3–4; 23. 14–17; IX. 7. 13–14; XXI. 63. 2, 7; XXII. 33. 11–12 (cp. 34. 10); XXIII. 31. 13–14; Cic. ND. II. 10–11; Div. I. 33; II. 74; Leg. II. 31; Val. Max. I. 1. 3, 5; Dio Cass. LIV. 24. 1; Plut. Marcel. 4, 5, 6; Zon. VIII. 20. Other reasons (serious disease, disgraceful defeat, other considerations, and for cen- sors – the death of a colleague): Liv. III. 29. 3; V. 9; 31. 7–8; VI. 27. 4–5; VIII. 3. 4; IX. 7. 12; 10. 1–2; 26. 20; 33. 4–9; 34; XXIV. 43. 4; XXVII. 6. 18; Dionys. IX. 13. 4; Plut. QR. 50.
  • Jahn J. Interregnum und Wahldiktatur. Kallmünz, 1970. S. 23; Kunkel W. Zum römischen Königtum // Kunkel W. Kleine Schriften: Zum römischen Strafverfahren und zur römischen Verfassungsgeschichte. Weimar, 1974. S. 345–366.
  • Gallup J. A Guide to Public Opinion Polls. 2nd rev. ed. Princeton (NJ), 1948. P. 11–15.
  • Osborne T., Rose N. Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena?: The Ex- ample of Public Opinion Research // The British Journal of Sociology. 1999. Vol. 50. No. 3. P. 367–396.
  • Юдин Г.Ю. Общественное мнение, или Власть цифр. Санкт-Петербург, 2020. С. 144, 145, 170.
  • Cic. Phil. II. 82; Liv. XXIV. 7. 12; XXVII. 6. 3.
  • Varro ap. Fest. 290L, s. v. praerogativae centuriae; Cic. Div. I. 103; II. 83; Mur. 38; Planc. 49; Verr. I. 26; Ad Q. fr. II. 14. 4; Liv. III. 51. 8; V. 18. 1; X. 22. 1; XXIV. 7. 12, 9. 3; XXVI. 22. 2–4, 12–13; XXVII. 6. 3; Plut. Cato min. 42 (mistakenly, tribe is mentioned instead of century); Jehne M. Wirkungsweise und Bedeutung der centuria praerogativa // Chiron. 2000. Bd. 30. S. 669–678; Meier Chr. Praerogativa centuria // Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplbd. 8. Stuttgart, 1956. Sp. 593–598.
  • Rosenstein N. Sorting out the Lot in Republican Rome // American Journal of Philology. 1995. Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 62.
  • Черных А.И. Ритуалы и мифы медиа. Санкт-Петербург, 2015. С. 147.
  • Bodrunova S. Mediacracy or Mediademocracy?: On Some Conceptual Approaches to the Interaction of Journalism and Politics in Established Democ- racies // Centre for German and European Studies Working Papers. 2010. Vol. 7. P. 1–40.
  • Beer D. Power Through the Algorithm?: Participatory Web Cultures and the Technological Unconscious // New Media & Society. 2009. Vol. 11. No. 6. P. 985–1002.
  • Сморчков А.М. Источники и характер магистратского права на ау- спиции: анализ акта renuntiatio // Вестник древней истории. 2010. № 1. С. 31–49.
  • Rilinger R. Der Einfluss des Wahlleiters bei den römischen Konsulwahlen von 366 bis 50 v. Chr. München, 1976. S. 144–151, 174–186; Giovannini A. Magistratur und Volk: Ein Beitrag zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Staatsrechts // Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik: Akten eines Sympo- siums, 12.–15. Juli 1988, Freie Universität Berlin. Stuttgart, 1990. S. 418–426.
  • Современные избирательные системы. Вып. 4: Австралия, Венесуэ- ла, Дания, Сербия. Москва, 2009. С. 62, 281.
  • Stewart R. Public Office in Early Rome: Ritual Procedure and Political Practice. Ann Arbor (MI), 1998. P. 22–51.
  • Руденко В.Н. Формы алеаторной демократии: генезис и развитие // Научный ежегодник Института философии и права Уральского отделения Российской академии наук. 2018. Т. 18. № 4. С. 97–125.
  • Рейбрук Д. ван. Против выборов. Москва, 2018. С. 117–131.
  • Burnheim J. Is Democracy Possible?: The Alternative to Electoral De- mocracy. 2nd ed. Sydney, 2006. P. 11–13.
  • Dryzek J. The Australian Citizens’ Parliament: a World First // Papers on Parliament. 2009. № 51. P. 37–47.
Еще
Статья научная