Влияние расходов на НИОКР на экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции

Бесплатный доступ

На современном этапе, когда эффекты глобализации ощущаются на самом высоком уровне, важная роль отводится увеличению экспорта высокотехнологичной продукции на международных рынках для достижения целей устойчивого экономического роста. В литературе признается, что на экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции влияют многие факторы, однако при этом подчеркивается, что значительное влияние оказывают расходы на исследования и разработки (НИОКР). В работе рассматривается влияние расходов на НИОКР на экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции в 11 развивающихся странах с рыночной экономикой в период 1996- 2018 гг. Среди показателей, которые, как считается, влияют на экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции, в дополнение к расходам на НИОКР использовались обменный курс, иностранный спрос, экономический рост и прямые иностранные инвестиции. Для анализа взаимосвязей был применен панельный квантильный регрессионный анализ. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют, что каждая переменная по-своему влияет на экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции, например, расходы на НИОКР, экономический рост и прямые иностранные инвестиции оказывают на него очень сильное положительное влияние. В свете полученных результатов важно отметить, что необходимо выделять больше средств на расходы на НИОКР, чтобы увеличить экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции и более эффективно пользоваться преимуществами международных торговых рынков, особенно в развивающихся странах.

Еще

Экономический рост, высокотехнологичная продукция, панельный квантильный регрессионный анализ, расходы на ниокр

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147239200

IDR: 147239200   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.8

Список литературы Влияние расходов на НИОКР на экспорт высокотехнологичной продукции

  • Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. NBER Working Paper Series, 3223, 1—48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3223
  • Aghion P., Garcia-Penalosa C., Howitt P. (2000). “Knowledge and Development: A Schumpeterian Approach,” Paper presented at the World Bank ABCDE Conference, June 2000.
  • Akay O. (2021). Yuksek teknoloji ihracatinda Turkiye’nin yeri ve belirleyicileri. Duzce Wniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 9(4), 1128—1141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.861464
  • Akta§ N., Gur B. (2021). E7 ve G7 ulkelerinin yuksek teknolojili urun ihracatini belirleyen faktorler: panel e§butunle§me analizi. International Journal of Applied Economic and Finance Studies, 6(2), 72—88. Available at: http://www.ijaefs.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/05_AKTAS-GUR.pdf (accessed: January 7, 2022).
  • Alemu A.M. (2012). The effect of R&D on high-tech product export competitiveness: Empirical evidence from panel data of East Asian economies. STI Policy Review, 3(1), 46—62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22675/ STIPR.2012.3.1.046.
  • Aw B.Y, Roberts M.J., Xu D.Y (2009) R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics. NBER Working Paper Series, 14670. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w14670/w14670.pdf (accessed: 1 March 2022).
  • Bojnec S., Ferto I. (2011). Impacts of research and development on manufacturing trade. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: casopis za ekonomsku teoriju ipraksu, 29(1), 65—88. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/69468 (accessed: December 25, 2021).
  • Boz F.Q., Gultekin O.F. (2019). BRICS ve MIST Ulkelerinde Ar-Ge Harcamalari ile Yuksek Teknolojili Urun ihracati Arasindaki ili§ki Uzerine Bir Ara§tirma. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches, 8(2), 1111— 1124. Available at: http://www.itobiad.com/issue/44987/533402, (accessed: January 6, 2022).
  • Braunerhjelm P., Thulin P. (2008). Can countries create comparative advantages? R&D expenditures, high-tech exports and country size in 19 OECD countries, 1981—1999. International Economic Journal, 22(1), 95—111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730801887026
  • Breusch T.S., Pagan A.R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239—253. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  • Qolakoglu M. (2021). OECD Ulkelerinde Be§eri Sermayenin Yuksek Teknolojili Urun ihracati ve EkonomikKompleksite Endeksi Uzerindeki Etkisi. Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Denizli (диссертация).
  • Davis L.A. (1982). Technology intensity of US output and trade. U.S Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration.
  • Durmu§ S.M. (2020). Ar-ge ve inovasyonun yuksek teknoloji urun ihracati uzerindeki etkisi: Yukselenpiyasa ekonomileri ornegi. Gumu^hane Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu iktisat Anabilim Dali Yuksek Lisans Programi, Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Gumu§hane. (диссертация)
  • Fagerberg J. Is there a large-country advantage in high-tech? Available at: https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/InnoWP/ archive/wpno526-1995.pdf (accessed: January 24, 2022).
  • Gaberli U. (2018). G7 ulkelerinde fikri mulkiyet haklarina yapilan odemeler ve ar-ge harcamalarinin yuksek teknoloji ihracatina etkisi: Bir panel veri analizi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, (641), 667—682 Available at: https:// dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/fpeyd/issue/47981/607037 (accessed: January 6, 2022).
  • Gourlay A., Seaton J., Suppakitjarak J. (2005). The determinants of export behaviour in UK service firms. The Service Industries Journal, 25(7), 879—889. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060500134154
  • Goger i. (2013). Ar-Ge harcamalarinin yuksek teknolojili urun ihracati, di§ ticaret dengesi ve ekonomik buyume uzerindeki etkileri. Maliye Dergisi, 165(2), 215—240. Available at: https://www.acarindex.com/pdfler/3a556386-9a95.pdf (accessed: December 27, 2021).
  • Griffith R., Redding S., Reenen J.V (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883 — 895. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1162/0034653043125194
  • Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1989). Product development and international trade. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1261—1283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/261653
  • Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory ofgrowth. The review of Economic Studies, 58(1), 43—61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2298044
  • Gruber W, Mehta D., Vernon R. (1967). The R&D factor in international trade and international investment of United States industries. Journal of Political Economy, 75(1), 20—37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/259235
  • Harris R., Moffat J. R&D, innovation and exporting. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33593/1/sercdp0073.pdf (accessed: February 15, 2022).
  • Hatzichronoglou T Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1787/050148678127
  • Ismail N.W (2013). Innovation and high-tech trade in Asian countries. In: Proceedings from International Conference on Recent Developments in Asian Trade Policy and Integration. Available at: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/gep/ documents/conferences/2013/malaysia-conference/normaz-wana-ismail.pdf (accessed: January 14, 2022).
  • Jones C.I., Ate§ S., Tuncer І. (2001). iktisadi buyumeye giri§. Literatur Yayincilik. Birinci Basim, istanbul.
  • Karasag F., Sagin A. (2018). Kamu ve ozel kesim Ar-Ge harcamalarinin yuksek teknolojili mallarin ihracatina etkisi: Avrupa ekonomileri analizi. The Journal of European Theoretical and Applied Studies, 6(1), 11—23. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/1129 (accessed: January 5, 2022).
  • Kilig C., Bayar Y., Ozekicioglu H. (2014). Ara§tirma geli§tirme harcamalarinin yuksek teknoloji urun ihracati uzerindeki etkisi: G—8 ulkeleri igin bir panel veri analizi. Erciyes ‘Universitesi iktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, (44), 115—130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.62317
  • Koenker R., Basset Jr. G.S. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33—50. Available at: https://doi. org/10.2307/1913643
  • Landesmann M., Pfaffermayr M. (1997). Technological competition and trade performance. Applied Economics, 29(2), 179-196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/000368497327254
  • Le C.D. (1987). The role of R&D in high-technology trade: An empirical analysis. Atlantic Economic Journal, 15(4), 32-38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02304202
  • Mani S. (2000). Exports of High Technology Products from Developing Countries: Is It Real or a Statistical Artifact? New Yark: United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies.
  • ISIC Rev. 3 Technology Intensity Definition — Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities. July 2011. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/48350231.pdf (accessed: January 1, 2022).
  • Oguz S., Sokmen A.G. (2020). Ara§tirma geli§tirme harcamalarmm yuksek teknolojili urun ihracatina etkisi: OECD ulkeleri uzerine bir panel veri analizi. International Journal of Economic & Administrative Studies, 27, 209—222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.651992
  • Ozer M., Qiftgi N. (2009). Ar-Ge harcamalari ve ihracat ili§kisi: OECD ulkeleri panel veri analizi. Dumlupinar Wniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 39—50. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/dpusbe/ issue/4765/65481 (accessed: December 5, 2021).
  • Ozkan G., Yilmaz H. (2017). Ar-ge harcamalarinin yuksek teknoloji urun ihracati ve ki§i ba§i gelir uzerindeki etkileri: 12 AB ulkesi ve Turkiye igin uygulama (1996—2015). Bilgi Ekonomisi ve YonetimiDergisi, 12(1), 1—12. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/beyder/issue/31845/318349, (accessed: January 25, 2022).
  • Pesaran M.H. (2004). General diagnostic test for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, (0435), 1—39, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  • Pesaran M.H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265—312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  • Pesaran M.H., Ullah A., Yamagata T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105—127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
  • Romer P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002—1037. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
  • Salari T.E., Roumiani A., Kazemzadeh E. (2021). Globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production impacts on ecological footprint in emerging countries: Using quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(36), 49627—49641. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-021-14204-x
  • Sandu S., Ciocanel B. (2014). Impact of R&D and innovation on high-tech export. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 80-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00450-X
  • Sara T.S., Jackson F.H., Upchurch L. T. (2012). Role of innovation in hi-tech-exports of a nation. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(7), 85-93. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n7p85
  • Schumpeter J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 27(4), 594-602.
  • Sey N., Aydin B. (2021). Turkiye’de Yuksek Teknoloji Urun ihracati ve inovasyon Iligkisi Uzerine Ekonometrik Bir inceleme. Ordu Wniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Sosyal Bilimler Ara§tirmalan Dergisi, 11(1), 238-252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.785193
  • Seyoum B. (2004). The role of factor conditions in high-technology exports: An empirical examination. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1), 145-162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016Xj. hitech.2003.09.007
  • Srholec M. (2007). High-tech exports from developing countries: A symptom of technology spurts or statistical illusion? Review of World Economics, 143(2), 227-255. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-007-0106-z
  • §ahbaz A., Yanar R., Adiguzel U. (2014). Ar-Ge harcamalari ve ileri teknoloji mal ihracati ili§kisi: panel nedensellik analizi. Qukurova Wniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 23(1), 47-60. Available at: https://dergipark.org. tr/en/pub/cusosbil/issue/32277/353193 (accessed: January 11, 2022).
  • Taban S., §engur M. (2014). Turkiye’de ar-ge ve ekonomik buyume. Abant izzet Baysal Wniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 14(1), 355-376. Available at: https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/ TWpNMU5URTFOUT09 (accessed: February 2, 2022).
  • Uzay N., Demir M., Yildirim E. (2012). ihracat performansi agisindan teknolojik yeniligin onemi: Turkiye imalat sanayi ornegi. Dogu§ Wniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 147-160. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ doujournal/issue/66666/1043058 (accessed: December 13, 2021).
  • Westerlund J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
  • Xu B., Lin B. (2018). What cause large regional differences in PM2. 5 pollutions in China? Evidence from quantile regression model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 447-461. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2017.11.008
  • Yaman H., Qetin D., Dulupgu M.A. (2020). OECD ulkelerinde ar-ge harcamalari ve ileri teknoloji ihracati: bir panel veri analizi. Anadolu Wniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(3), 193-208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18037/ ausbd.801751
  • Yavuz G., Uysal О. (2020). Yuksek teknolojili urun ihracatmi etkileyen faktorlerin analizi: OECD ornegi. Uluslararasi Ekonomi i§letme ve Politika Dergisi, 4(1), 205—220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.673698
  • Yildirim E., Kesikoglu F. (2012). Ar-Ge harcamalari ile ihracat arasindaki nedensellik ili§kileri: Turkiye orneginde panel nedensellik testi kanitlari. iktisadi ve idariBilimlerDergisi, 32(1), 165—180. Available at: https://dergipark. org.tr/en/pub/muiibd/issue/495/4472 (accessed: January 10, 2022).
Еще
Статья научная