The tiger-dog and its semantics in the Nanai Shamanic sculpture: cultural and cognitive aspects

The tiger-dog and its semantics in the Nanai Shamanic sculpture: cultural and cognitive aspects

Автор: Maltseva O.V.

Журнал: Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia @journal-aeae-en

Рубрика: Ethnology

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.49, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This article describes the Nanai shamanic set, combining two images—a dog and a tiger. The Nanai shamanic sculpture is viewed as a phenomenon reflecting both the subjective and the objective reality constructed by traditional cultural practices. Parallels with Siberian and Pacific cultures reveal the significance of the domestic animal and the wild predator for the people of the Lower Amur. Using folkloric and lexical data, findings of field studies, and ethnographic evidence, folk images of the dog and the tiger are reconstructed. Viewing the problem in the context of collective knowledge about the world reveals the archetypical and modified layers in the image’s construction. The idea of the dog, typical of all the peoples of Siberia and the Russian Far East, is that of a draft animal, assistant, sacrifice, and guide to the afterworld. Its image in the Nanai shamanic sculpture was meant to enhance the power of the spirit. It was often combined with the image of the tiger, personifying shaman’s power and the progenitors. The analysis of the terminology relating to the tiger attests to the Southeast Asian roots of its cult. The tiger semantics in the Nanai culture resulted from a blend of Tungus, Paleoasiatic, and Manchu (Chinese) elements. These images were used by shamans not only as assistants in “capturing” spirits and holding them in “detention”, but also as a means of communicating with the world of spirits.

Еще

Ritual sculpture, Nanai people, dog, tiger, semantic field, shaman

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/145146260

IDR: 145146260   |   DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2021.49.2.125-133

Список литературы The tiger-dog and its semantics in the Nanai Shamanic sculpture: cultural and cognitive aspects

  • Artemieva E.Y. 1999 Osnovy psikhologii subyektivnoi semantiki. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Baldick J. 2012 Animal and Shaman. Ancient Religions of Central Asia. London, New York: I.B. Tauris.
  • Bereznitsky S.V. 2003 Klassifikatsiya kultovoi atributiki korennykh narodov Dalnego Vostoka Rossii. In Tipologiya kultury korennykh narodov Dalnego Vostoka Rossii (materialy k istoriko-etnograficheskomu atlasu). Vladivostok: Dalnauka, pp. 190–220.
  • Bulgakova T.D. 2016 Kamlaniya nanaiskikh shamanov. Norderstedt: Verlag der Kulturstiftung Sibirien SEC Publications.
  • Campbell J. 2002 Mifi cheskiy obraz. Moscow: Akt.
  • Cherenkov S.E., Poyarkov A.D. 2003 Volk, shakal. Moscow: Astrel, AST.
  • Flier A.Y. 2012 Proiskhozhdeniye kultury: Novaya kontseptsiya kulturogeneza. In Informatsionnyi gumanitarnyi portal “Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye”, No. 4 (July–August). URL: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2012/4/Flier_The-Origin-of-Culture/ (Accessed February 21, 2020).
  • Folklor yukagirov. 2005 Moscow, Novosibirsk: Nauka.
  • Geertz Cl. 1973 The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books. Istoriya i kultura orochei: Istoriko-etnografi cheskiye ocherki. 2001 St. Petersburg: Nauka.
  • Ivanov S.V. 1937 Medved v religioznom i dekorativnom iskusstve narodnostei Priamurya. In Pamyati V.G. Bogoraza (1865–1936). Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR, pp. 1–44.
  • Ivanov S.V. 1970 Skulptura narodov Severa Sibiri. Leningrad: Nauka.
  • Kubanova T.A. 1992 Ritualnaya skulptura nanaitsev. Komsomolsk-on-Amur: [Tip. APO im. Gagarina].
  • Lipsky A.N. 1925 Vvedeniye. In Pervyi tuzemnyi syezd DVO. Khabarovsk: pp. 5–52 (V–LII).
  • Lopatin I.A. 1922 Goldy amurskiye, ussuriyskiye i sungariyskiye. Vladivostok.
  • Losey R.J., Bazaliiskii V.I., Garvie-Lok S., Germonpré M., Leonard J.A., Allen A.L., Katzenberg M.A., Sablin M.V. 2011 Canids as persons: Early Neolithic dog and wolf burials, Cis-Baikal, Siberia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 30 (2): 174–189.
  • Losey R.J., Nomokonova T., Gusev A.V., Bachura O.P., Fedorova N.V., Kosintsev P.A., Sablin M.V. 2018 Dogs were domesticated in the Arctic: Culling practices and dog sledding at Ust’-Polui. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 51: 113–126.
  • Maltseva O.V. 2008 Traditsionnye vozzreniya nanaitsev v kultovoi skulpture (po dnevnikovym materialam V.A. Timokhina, 1960–70-e gody). In Zapiski Grodekovskogo muzeya, iss. 20. Khabarovsk: Izd. Khabar. kraevogo kraeved. muzeya, pp. 164−169.
  • Mamontova N. 2015 Language as mechanism of systemic foundation: Tungus-speaking groups in the Far East. Asian Ethnicity, vol. 17 (1): 48–66.
  • Nanaiskiy folklor. Ningman, siokhor, telungu. 1996 N.B. Kile (comp.). Novosibirsk: Nauka.
  • Nanaitsy. 2019 Katalog kollektsii iz sobraniya Khabarovskogo kraevogo muzeya im. N.I. Grodekova. G.T. Titoreva et al. (comp.). Krasnoyarsk: Yuniset.
  • Onenko S.N. 1980 Nanaisko-russkiy slovar. Moscow: Rus. yaz.
  • Ostrovsky A.B. 2009 Ritualnaya skulptura narodov Amura i Sakhalina. Putevodnaya nit chisel. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.
  • Ostrovsky A.B. 2019 Antropologiya myshleniya: Izbrannye statyi 1990–2016 gg. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.
  • Ostrovsky A.B., Sem T.Y. 2019 Kody kommunikatsii s bogami: (Mifologiya i ritualnaya plastika ainov). St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.
  • Perekhvalskaya E.V. 2008 Russkiye pidzhiny. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya. Priamurye. Fakty, tsifry, nablyudeniya. 1909 Moscow.
  • Samar A.P. 2011 Traditsionnoye sobakovodstvo nanaitsev. Vladivostok: Dalnauka.
  • Samar E.D. 2003 Pod senyu rodovogo dreva. Zapiski ob etnokulture i vozzreniyakh gerinskikh nanaitsev roda Samande-Mokha-Mongol/roda Samar. Khabarovsk: Kn. izd.
  • Savelieva V.N., Taksami C.M. 1970 Nivkhsko-russkiy slovar. Moscow: Sov. entsikl.
  • Schrenck L.I. 1883–1903 Ob inorodtsakh Amurskogo kraya. In 3 vol. St. Petersburg: Izd. AN.
  • Sem T.Y. 2001 Sobaka-mergen v folklore i ritualakh nanaitsev. In Ritualnoye prostranstvo kultury: Materialy mezhdunar. foruma. St. Petersburg: pp. 101–104.
  • Sem T.Y. 2002 Shamanizm tungusoyazychnykh narodov Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka po materialam REM. In Rasy i narody, iss. 28. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 226–242.
  • Shimkevich P.P. 1896 Materialy dlya izucheniya shamanstva u goldov. In Zapiski Priamurskogo otdeleniya IRGO, vol. II, iss. 1. Khabarovsk: [Tip. kantselyarii Priamur. general-gubernatora].
  • Shirokogoroff S.M. 1919 Opyt issledovaniya shamanstva u tungusov. In Uchenye zap. ist.-fi lol. fak. v g. Vladivostoke, vol. 1. Vladivostok: [Tip. obl. zemsk. upravleniya], pp. 47–108.
  • Shirokogoroff S.M. 1935 Psychomental Complex of the Tungus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
  • Smolyak A.V. 1976 Predstavleniya nanaitsev o mire. In Priroda i chelovek v religioznykh predstavleniyakh narodov Sibiri i Severa (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX v.). Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 129–160.
  • Smolyak A.V. 1991 Shaman: Lichnost, funktsii, mirovozzreniye. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Sokolova Z.P. 1998 Zhivotnye v religiyakh. St. Petersburg: Lan.
  • Stepanoff C., Marchina C., Fossier C., Bureau N. 2017 Animal autonomy and intermittent coexistences. North Asian modes of herding. Current Anthropology, vol. 58 (1): 57–81.
  • Sternberg L.Y. 1933 Gilyaki, orochi, goldy, negidaltsy, ainy. Khabarovsk: Dalgiz.
  • Titoreva G.T. 2012 Seveny: Katalog kultovoi skulptury iz sobraniya KhKM im. N.I. Grodekova. Khabarovsk: Khabarov. kraevoi muzei im. N.I. Grodekova.
  • Zelenin D.K. 1936 Kult ongonov v Sibiri. Perezhitki totemizma v ideologii narodov Sibiri. Moscow, Leningrad: AN SSSR.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©