The role of the tutor in the choice of pedagogical management tools for autonomous work in foreign languages

Автор: Chikileva Lyudmila S.

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Академическая интеграция

Статья в выпуске: 3 (96), 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The paper presents the results a study of the implementation of individual educational routes in students' autonomous foreign language study at a non-linguistic university. Factors determining student motivation and satisfaction with the autonomous study using the Rosetta Stone Advantage platform were considered. The purpose of the study was to find out how tutors manage autonomous work and what ICT tools are used in this process. The relevance of this study is determined by the importance of the implementation of electronic platforms in the process of teaching foreign languages, as well as the need to investigate new forms of management used by tutors in the process of monitoring individual learning activities in electronic educational environment. Materials and Methods. The following methods have been used in this research: a survey with Likert scale, data analysis, semantic interpretation of data and graphical representation of data. The empirical basis of this study includes the results of the survey of students of the Institute of Distance Learning and Open Education at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow). Results. In the present article it is shown that students can benefit from the integration of electronic platforms in foreign language learning since it provides them with excellent opportunities to choose their own educational content that takes both their professional interests and their present level of foreign language proficiency into account. However, although most students are motivated to use electronic educational platforms in their autonomous work, they need assistance. Tutors play an important role in the organisation of this type of educational activity in terms of explaining how to work with the platform, helping students to choose individual learning routes and providing motivation. Using various ICT tools of pedagogical management, tutors monitor the process of autonomous work and control its results; thus, the individual work of students becomes more efficient. Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the research and the discussion of these results with colleagues at scientific conferences and methodological seminars help to determine future perspectives for the successful use of pedagogical management tools in the process of autonomous study on electronic educational platforms. The results of the research have practical value for teachers of foreign languages working in the electronic educational environment.

Еще

Personal learning environment, individual educational routes, motivation, electronic educational platform, ict tools, tutor

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147220722

IDR: 147220722   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.096.023.201903.475-489

Список литературы The role of the tutor in the choice of pedagogical management tools for autonomous work in foreign languages

  • Orden V. S. Integrating Digital Technologies in the German Language Classroom: A Critical Study of the Technology-Integration Experiences of Three Secondary German Teachers. Ph.D. thesis. Utah State University, 2010. 14 р. URL: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/123709 (дата обращения: 09.08.2018).
  • Kalugina O. A., Tarasevich N. A. Smart Technology Integration into EFL Teaching at Non-Linguistic Higher School // XLinguae. 2018. Vol. 11, Issue 1XL. Pp. 8-18. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.01XL.02
  • Kim S., Song S. M., Yoon Y. I. Smart Learning Services Based on Smart Cloud Computing // Sensors. 2011. Vol. 11, No. 8. Pp. 7835-7850. DOI: 10.3390/s110807835
  • Lee J., Zo H., Lee H. Smart Learning Adoption in Employees and HRD Managers // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2014. Vol. 45, No. 6. Pp. 1082-1096. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12210
  • Hwang G. J., Tsai C. C., Wang S. J. H. Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning // Educational Technology Society. 2008. Vol. 11, No. 2. Pp. 81-91. URL: https:// www.j-ets.net/ets/journals/11_2/8.pdf (дата обращения: 09.08.2018).
  • Daniel J. Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2012. No. 3.
  • DOI: 10.5334/2012-18
  • Teacher's Role and Students' Role in English for Specific Purposes in E-Learning / L. A. Kucirkova [et al.] // XLinguae. 2017. Vol. 10, Issue 2. Pp. 63-77.
  • DOI: 10.18355/XL.2017.10.02.06
  • Investigating Effective Foreign Language Learning Design and the Implications for Distance Learning Tools / I. I. Klimova [et al.] // XLinguae. 2017. Vol. 10, Issue 3. Pp. 273-284.
  • DOI: 10.18355/XL.2017.10.03.22
  • ArkT. V. Supporting English Language Learners with Next-Gen Tools [Электронный ресурс]. 2016. 44 p. URL: http://www.gettingsmart.com/publication/supporting-english-language-learners-next-gen-tools (дата обращения: 06.08.2018).
  • Chikileva L. S. Implementation of Electronic Platforms in Language Learning: Benefits for Teachers and Students // Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science. 2018. No. 3. Pp. 381-386.
  • Sharpless M., Taylor J., Vavoula G. A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age // The Sage Handbook of E-Learning Research / R. Andrews, C. Haythornthwaite (eds.). London: Sage, 2007. Pp. 221-247.
  • DOI: 10.4135/9781848607859.n10
  • Musavi A. Redefining Technology Role in Education // Creative Education. 2011. № 2. Pp. 130-135.
  • DOI: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018
  • Koper R. Conditions for Effective Smart Learning Environments [Электронный ресурс] // Smart Learning Environments. 2014. Vol. 1. 2014. Pp. 562-571.
  • DOI: 10.1186/540561-014-005-4
  • Liton H.A. Examining Students' Perception & Efficacy of Using Technology in Teaching English. International Journal of Education and Information Technology. 2015; 1(1):11-19. (In Eng.)
  • Chapelle C. A. Is Networked-Based Learning CALL? // Network-based Language Teaching. Concepts and Practice / Warschauer M., Kern R. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp. 204-228.
  • DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524735.012
  • Papadakis S. Creativity and Innovation in European Education: 10 years eTwinning. Past, Present and the Future // International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. 2016. Vol. 8, No. 3/4. Pp. 279-296.
  • DOI: 10.1504/IJTEL.2016.082315
  • Goodwin K. Use of Tablet Technology in the Classroom, NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre. State of New South Wales, Department of Education and Communities, 2012. URL: http://fad.teluq.ca/ teluqDownload.php?file=2013/11/iPad_Evaluation_Sydney_Region_v2.pdf (дата обращения: 08.11.2018).
  • Putting Education in "Educational" Apps Lessons from the Science of Learning / K. Hirsh-Pasek [et al.] // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2015. Vol. 16, Issue 1. Pp. 3-34.
  • DOI: 10.1177/1529100615569721
  • Beschorner B., Hutchison A. iPads as a Literacy Teaching Tool in Early Childhood // International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 1, No. 1. Pp. 16-24. URL: https:// www.learntechlib.org/p/160449 (дата обращения: 08.11.2018).
  • Shuler C. Pockets of Potential: Using Mobile Technologies to Promote Children's Learning. The Joan Ganz Cooney Centre at Sesame Workshop. New York, 2009. URL: http://www.joanganzcooneycenter. org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/pockets_of_potential_1_.pdf (дата обращения: 08.11.2018).
  • Mohamed A. J., Lakulu M. M. A Framework of Mobile Educational Application for Kindergarten Early Reading // The International Journal of Multimedia
  • DOI: 10.5121/ijma.2017.9610
  • Papadakis S., Kalogiannakis M. Mobile Educational Applications for Children: What Educators and Parents Need to Know // Mobile Learning and Organisation. 2017. Vol. 11, No. 3. Pp. 256-277.
  • DOI: 10.1504/IJMLO.2017.10003925
  • Singaporean Parents' Views of Their Young Children's Access and Use of Technological Devices / M. Ebbeck [et al.] // Early Childhood Education Journal. 2016. Vol. 44, Issue 2. Pp. 127-134.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10643-015-0695-4
  • Crescenzi-Lanna L., Grane-Ord M. An Analysis of the Interaction Design of the Best Educational Apps for Children Aged Zero to Eight // Comunicar. 2016. Vol. 24, No. 46. Pp. 77-85.
  • DOI: 10.3916/C46-2016-08
  • Bouck E. C., Satsangi R., Flanagan S. Focus on Inclusive Education: Evaluating Apps for Students with Disabilities: Supporting Academic Access and Success // Childhood Education. 2016. Vol. 92, Issue 4. Pp. 324-328.
  • DOI: 10.1080/00094056.2016.1208014
  • Merc A. Using Technology in the Classroom: A Study with Turkish Pre-Service EFL Teachers // TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2015. Vol. 14, Issue 2. Pp. 229-240. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283231199_Using_technology_in_the_classroom_A_study_ with_turkish_pre-service_EFL_teachers (дата обращения: 08.11.2018).
  • Artino A. R., Jr. Online or Face-to-Face Learning? Exploring the Personal Factors that Predict Students' Choice of Instructional Format // Internet and Higher Education. 2010. Vol. 13, No. 4. Pp. 272-276.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.005
  • Интегративные механизмы повышения эффективности учебно-методического взаимодействия преподавателя и студента / В. Ф. Габдулхаков [и др.] // Интеграция образования. 2018. Т. 22, № 2. С. 248-261.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.00510.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.248-261
  • Стриелковски В., Киселева Л. С., Попова Е. Н. Детерминанты качества университетского образования: мнение студентов // Интеграция образования. 2018. Т. 22, № 2. С. 220-236.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.00510.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.220-236
  • Melnichuk M. V., Osipova V. M. Cooperative Learning as a Valuable Approach to Teaching Translation // XLinguae. 2017. Vol. 10, Issue 1. Pp. 25-33.
  • DOI: 10.18355/XL.2017.10.01.03
  • McLoughlin C., Lee M. Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software // Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2010. Vol. 26, Issue 1. Pp. 28-43.
  • DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1100
  • Transforming Teaching and Learning: Embedding ICT Into Everyday Classroom Practices / R. Sutherland [et al.] // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2004. Vol. 20, No. 6. Pp. 399-409. x
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00104
  • Wang Q. A Generic Model for Guiding the Integration of ICT into Teaching and Learning // Innovation in Education and Teaching International. 2008. Vol. 45, Issue 4. Pp. 411-119.
  • DOI: 10.1080/14703290802377307
Еще
Статья научная