The experience of Russia and China in addressing the age aspect of the digital divide

The experience of Russia and China in addressing the age aspect of the digital divide

Автор: Fang F., Gruzdeva M.A., Tan R., Zhang X.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Scientific reviews

Статья в выпуске: 5 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The process of demographic aging is global and irreversible, and the share of the elderly in the population of most countries will steadily increase. This sets strategic tasks of taking these trends into account in management, creating conditions for quality life of people in older ages. In the conditions of rapid digitalization of the economy and branches of the social sphere, the issue of integration of elderly people into modern processes, monitoring the dynamics and factors of inclusion, and creating conditions for leveling various kinds of related exclusion is acute. The aim of the article is to comparatively analyze the practices of digital inclusion of the elderly in China and Russia in order to identify opportunities to improve their effectiveness. We used a complex of general scientific methods and relevant empirical base, consisting of data from population censuses and statistics on the development of information and communication infrastructure in the countries under consideration. We show the current state of research on the problem of age digital divide in China, Russia and other countries. We outline the scale and main trends in the use of digital technologies by elderly people, which unite China and Russia and are expressed in the growing number of Internet users in older ages, the desire for more active use of mobile Internet and mobile apps. The main constraints and challenges for the elderly with inadequate digital inclusion are formulated. In the conclusion, the main directions of development and increasing the effectiveness of inclusion practices of the older generation in digital interactions are formed. The results may be useful for formulating management decisions for successful digital development in the countries under consideration.

Еще

Digitalization, digital inequality, digital divide, digital divide age factor, elderly people, Russia, china

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147242455

IDR: 147242455   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.5.89.14

Список литературы The experience of Russia and China in addressing the age aspect of the digital divide

  • Anderson M., Perrin A. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults: Technology use among seniors. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/14/2017/05/16170850/PI_2017.05.17_OlderAmericans-Tech_FINAL.pdf.
  • Berner J., Rennemark M., Jogréus C., Berglund J. (2012). Distribution of personality, individual characteristics and internet usage in Swedish older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 16, 119–126. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2011.602958
  • Bikkulov A.S., Sergeeva O.V. (2016). Personal computer as everyday technology: Empirical research of computer usage among Russian elderly. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo un-ta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Ser: Sotsial’nye nauki=Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2(42), 95–103 (in Russian).
  • Bin W. (2020). A study on the influencing factors of internet use among Chinese senior citizens in a multidimensional explanatory perspective. Population and Development, 26(3), 98–106.
  • Chassiakos Y.J., Radesky D., Christakis M., Moreno C. (2016). Cross children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2593.
  • Chenxi H. (2020). The current situation, challenges and countermeasures of the digital divide of the elderly. People’s Forum, 29(10), 126–128.
  • Donelle L., Facca D., Burke Sh., Hiebert B., Bender E., Ling S. (2021). Exploring Canadian children’s social media use, digital literacy, and quality of life: Pilot cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Formative Research, 5. DOI: 10.2196/18771
  • Gladkova A.A., Garifullin V.Z., Ragnedda M. (2019). Model of three levels of the digital divide: Current advantages and limitations (exemplified by the Republic of Tatarstan). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10. Zhurnalistika, 4, 41–72. DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.4172 (in Russian).
  • Gorelova T.P., Serebrovskaya T.B. (2021). Generation N: Shaping new digital consumers. Ploblemy teorii i practiki uptavlenia=International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 6, 263–278 (in Russian).
  • Grinin L.E., Grinin A.L. (2020). Global ageing and the future of the global world. Vek globalizatsii=Age of Globalization, 1(33), 3–20 (in Russian).
  • Gruzdeva M.A. (2020). Inclusion of population in digital space: Global trends and inequality of Russian regions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(5), 90–104. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.5 (in Russian).
  • Gruzdeva M.A. (2021). Digitalization of state and municipal services: A portrait of a regional user. Zhurnal issledovanii po upravleniyu=Journal of Management Studies, 5, 3–13 (in Russian).
  • Gruzdeva M.A. (2022). The age factor in the digital divide: The edges of inequality. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(4), 228–241. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.14 (in Russian).
  • Hodong Y., Peng H., Sangui W. (2020). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: Realistic representation, influence mechanism and promotion strategy. Reform, 12, 48–56.
  • Hongyan Y., Xin Ch. et al. (2020). Potential categories and influencing factors of mental health of the elderly. Social Security Research, 2, 20–28.
  • Ilyin V.A. et al. (2019). Natsional’nye proekty 2019–2024 gg.: analiz i klyuchevye riski ikh realizatsii. Nauchno-tekhnologicheskaya sfera i predprinimatel’stvo: nauchno-analiticheskoe izdanie [National Projects 2019–2024: Analysis and Key Risks of their Implementation. Scientific and Technological Sphere and Entrepreneurship: Scientific and Analytical Edition.]. Vologda: FSBIS VolRC RAS.
  • Joan M.K. (2005) The digital divide: Internet and e-mail use by the elderly. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 30 (01), 19–23．
  • Kaijie D. (2009). Bridging the digital divide: A social integration perspective. Contemporary World and Socialism, 3, 159–162.
  • Karapetyan R.V., Lebedeva E.V., Titarenko L.G. (2021). Technoagism and technical behavior of the elderly citizens: Results of Russian and Belarusian researches. Uspekhi gerontologii=Advances in Gerontology, 34(2), 311–318 (in Russian).
  • Kuchmaeva O.V., Arkhipova Yu.M. (2021). Digital technologies in everyday life of the Russians. Voprosy statistiki=Bulletin of Statistics, 3, 45–55 (in Russian).
  • Kurantin N., Osei-Hwedie B.Z. (2019). Digital Financial Integration, Investment， Economic Growth, Development and Poverty Reduction. Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Lili Xie (2014). A study on the factors influencing the internet use of the elderly based on the theory of planned behavior. Scientific Research on Aging, 4, 50–59.
  • Mitzner T., Savla J., Boot W. et al. (2019). Technology adoption by older adults: Findings from the PRISM trial. Gerontologist, 59(1), 34–44. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny113
  • Niehaves B., Plattfaut R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 708–726.
  • Nieminen H. (2016). Digital divide and beyond: What do we know of information and communications technology’s long-term social effects? Some uncomfortable questions. European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115614198
  • Peng Du, Wenting Han (2021). Internet and the seniors’ life: Challenges and opportunities. Population Studies, 3, 3–16.
  • Prensky M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon. MCB University Press, 9(5).
  • Ragnedda M., Kreitem H. (2018). The three levels of digital divide in East EU countries. World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 4, 5–27. DOI: 10.30547/worldofmedia.4.2018.1
  • Ramon T.M.，Angel J. (2016). The capacity of elderly citizens to access digital media in Andalusia (Spain)． Information communication and society, 19 (10), 1427–1444．
  • Robinson L., Cotten S.R., Ono H., Quan-Haase A., Mesch G., Chen W. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.
  • Senokosova O.V. (2018). Problems of labor utilization and training of the population aged 60+. Professional’naya orientatsiya, 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-ispolzovaniya-truda-i-podgotovki-naseleniya-v-vozraste-60 (in Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Korolenko A.V. (2019). Children’s involvement in digital space: Gadgetization trends and threats to human development. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya=Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations, 3(4), 430–442 (in Russian).
  • Shakirova G.F. (2020). Psychological features of students’ gadget addiction. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal, 1(138), 217–223 (in Russian).
  • Shinyaeva O.V., Poletaeva O.V., Slepova O.M. (2019). Information and digital inequality: Searching for effective population adaptation practices. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 4, 68–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.04 (in Russian).
  • Shinyaeva O.V., Slepova O.M. (2019). Information digital inequality of population: Risk and anti-risk factors. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya=Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 19(1), 53–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2019-19-1-53-61 (in Russian).
  • Silver H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 531–578.
  • Skiter N.N., Ketko N.V., Rogachev A.F., Gushchina E.G., Vitalyeva E.M. (2020). Institutional poverty as one of the main threats to the digital economy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, ahead-of-print.
  • Smirnykh L.I. (2020). Digital literacy of the elderly population and digitalization of enterprises: Experience of European countries. Voprosy ekonomiki=Economic Issues, 12, 104–124 (in Russian).
  • Solomatina V.A. (2020). Digital literacy of young learners. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-gumanitarnogo universiteta=Bulletin of The State University of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(37), 71–74 (in Russian).
  • Tianqi M., Lu D., Peng H. (2021). Digital economy and urban and rural inclusive growth: A perspective based on digital skills. Financial Review, 13(04), 36–125.
  • Toffler A. (2003). Metamorfozy vlasti [Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AST.
  • Varlamova Yu.A. (2022). The intergenerational digital divide in Russia. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 31(2), 51–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-2-51-74 (in Russian).
  • Volchenko O.V. (2016). Dynamics of the digital inequality in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 5, 163–182. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.5.10 (in Russian).
  • Xiangming Zh., Xingdong F. (2022). Smart divide: Paradigm shift of digital divide. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 44(4), 133–142.
  • Xiaohong Zh. (2016). Intergenerational differences in reverse cultural nurturing and media influence. Journal of Jiangsu Administrative College, 2, 63–69.
  • Yates S., Kirby J., Lockley E. (2015). Digital media use: Differences and inequalities in relation to class and age. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 1–21. DOI: 10.5153/sro.3751.
  • Yifei G. (2019). Protection of the rights of the “digital disadvantaged” in the smart society. Jianghai Journal, 5, 163–169.
  • Yong‘ai Jin, Menghan Zhao (2019). Internet use and active aging of Chinese elders: An analysis based on data from the 2016 China Social Tracking Survey of the elderly. Journal of Population, 6, 44–55.
  • Zarubina Yu.N., Vlasova A.A. (2018). Gender inequality in digital society. Vestnik sotsial’no-politicheskikh nauk, 17, 16–20 (in Russian).
  • Zechi Q., Shuqin Zh., Shiding L. (2016). From digital divide to dividend difference-a perspective of internet capital. China Social Science, 10, 93–115.
  • Zeqi Qiu (2021). How to cross the intergenerational digital divide in the context of population aging. Popular Tribune, 6, 15–18.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©