The Estimation of Remuneration Efficiency in Monopsony: Concerning the Arctic Fishing Industrial Cluster

The Estimation of Remuneration Efficiency in Monopsony: Concerning the Arctic Fishing Industrial Cluster

Автор: Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P.

Журнал: Arctic and North @arctic-and-north

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 47, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

At present, new financial mechanisms of interaction between employees and employers in the context of market relations are being formed and improved in Russia. The decisive factor in workers’ performance is their financial motivation and stimulation. The determinative of productivity of an enterprise activity is remuneration efficiency as a base of laborers’ financial motivation and stimulation. The remuneration is a flexible element of distributive relations and it is impossible to create an effective motivational mechanism without an establishment of its communication with final results. Such indices as salary distribution and salary intensity as basic indicators of wage efficiency assessment have been used in the paper. The object of the research is sixteen large and medium-sized fishing enterprises in the Arkhangelsk region as a part of the Arctic fishing cluster. These enterprises catch fish in the Barents and Norwegian seas, as well as in the North Atlantic. It has been shown that the financial results of fishing enterprises depend on external conditions — primarily on the quotas for fish catch and the price of fish products. In the research, the authors have proceeded from the following hypotheses: the Arctic fishing cluster’s enterprises operate in a monopsony on the labor market; there is a pattern between the size of wage fund and financial performance of the Arctic fishery cluster enterprises; the change in wage fund is an effective mechanism to improve the efficiency of the Arctic fishery cluster. In the course of the research, the following interrelated tasks have been solved: the identification of the features of the Arctic fishing cluster’s labor market; the assessment of the effectiveness of the wage fund use for the Arctic fishing cluster’s enterprises based on the author's methodology; the identification of the importance of the problem of insufficient efficiency of wage fund use in the Arctic fishing cluster.

Еще

Labor market, monopsony, Arctic fishing cluster

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148324396

IDR: 148324396   |   DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2022.47.43

Список литературы The Estimation of Remuneration Efficiency in Monopsony: Concerning the Arctic Fishing Industrial Cluster

  • Savina S.V. Oplata truda v sovremennykh usloviyakh: obshcherossiyskiy i regional'nyy konteksty [Labor Remuneration in Modern Conditions: All-Russian and Regional Contexts]. Normirovanie i oplata truda v promyshlennosti [Rationing and Wages in Industry], 2021, no. 6, pp. 22–31. DOI: 10.33920/pro-3-2106-02
  • Rosefield S. Comparative Economic Systems. In: Comparative Economic Systems: Culture, Wealth and Power in the 21st Century (Comparison of Economic Systems in 21st Century). Malden, John Wiley & Sons, 2015, 304 p. DOI:10.1002/9780470693667.ch1
  • Stebakova T.A. Ponyatie politiki zarabotnoy platy v innovatsionnom razvitii ekonomiki [Concept of the Policy of Wages in Innovative Economic Development]. Mirovaya nauka [World Science], 2018, No. 9 (18), pp. 54–57.
  • Marinescu I., Ouss I., Pape L.-D. Wages, Hires, and Labor Market Concentration. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2021, vol. 184, pp. 506–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.01.033
  • Meer J., West J. Effects of the Minimum Wage on Employment Dynamics. The Journal of Human Re-sources, 2016, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 500–522. DOI: 10.3368/jhr.51.2.0414-6298R1
  • Schlicht E. Efficiency Wages: Variants and Implications. IZA World of Labor, 2016, vol. 275. DOI: 10.15185/izawol.275
  • Goldin C., Katz L.F. Long-Run Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing. NBER Working Paper, 2007, no. w13568, 39 p. DOI: 10.3386/w13568
  • Millea M. Disentangling the Wage-Productivity Relationship: Evidence from Select OECD Member Countries. International Advances in Economic Research, 2002, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 314–323. DOI: 10.1007/BF02295506
  • García-Vega M., Kneller R., Stiebale J. Labor Market Reform and Innovation: Evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 2021, vol. 50, no. 5. 104213. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104213
  • Drago R. Incentives, Pay and Performance: a Study of Australian Employees. Applied Economics, 1991, vol. 23, pp. 1433–1446. DOI: 10.1080/00036849100000194
  • Dmitrieva S.O., Abubekerova D.P. Zarabotnaya plata kak osnovnoy motiviruyushchiy faktor [Salary as the Main Motivating Factor]. Sotsial'nye nauki [Social-Economic Sciences], 2020, no. 1 (28), pp. 3–7.
  • Derkach P.V., Shamrina I.V. Vysokaya zarabotnaya plata kak faktor povysheniya proizvoditel'nosti truda [High Wages as a Factor of Increase Labour Productivity]. Vestnik Tul'skogo filiala Finuniversi-teta [Bulletin of the Tula Branch of the Financial University], 2020, no. 1, pp. 477–479.
  • Borisova V.Yu., Piven I.G. Voprosy analiza fonda zarabotnoy platy: metodicheskie aspekty i naprav-leniya [Issues of Salary Fund Analysis: Methodological Aspects and Directions]. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika [Economy and Business: Theory and Practice], 2021, No. 3–1 (73), pp. 84–86. DOI: 10.24412/2411-0450-2021-3-1-84-86
  • Sandrini L. Incentives for Labour–Augmenting Innovations in Vertical Markets: The Role of Wage Rate. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2021, vol. 75. 102715. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2021.102715
  • Westerman J. Unequal Involvement, Unequal Attainment? A Theoretical Reassessment and Empiri-cal Analysis of the Value of Motivation in the Labor Market. Social Science Research, 2018, vol. 76, pp. 169–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.08.007
  • Wadhwani S.B., Wall M. A Direct Test of the Efficiency Wage Model Using UK Micro-Data. Economics, 1991. DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.OEP.A042015
  • Dube A. The Long-Run Impact of Minimum Wage Research: A Case Study of Myth and Measurement. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2017, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 818–823. DOI: 10.1177/0019793917696309b
  • Addison J., Blackburn M.L., Cotti Ch.D. On the Robustness of Minimum Wage Effects: Geographically-Disparate Trends and Job Growth Equations. Working Paper Series in Economics, 2014, no. 330.
  • Martin Ch., Wang B. Search, Shirking and Labor Market Volatility. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2020, vol. 66. 103243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2020.103243
  • Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P., Samarin A.V. Russia's North Regions as Frontier Territories: Demograph-ic Indicators and Management Features. European Research Studies Journal, 2018, no. 21(3), pp. 705–716. DOI: 10.35808/ersj/1094
  • Skufina T., Baranov S.V., Samarina V.P., Samarin A.V. Natural Resources as a Factor of Socio-Economic Development of the Arctic Territories: Theoretical Components of the Research Problem. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Science, 2019, vol. 302, no. 1. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012156
  • Jungsberg L., Copus A., Nilsson K., Weber R. Demographic Change and Labour Market Challenges in Regions with Large-scale Resource-based Industries in the Northern Periphery and Arctic. Stockholm, Nordregio, 2018, 42 p.
  • Kudryashova E.V., Lipina S.A., Zaikov K.S., Bocharova L.K., Lipina A.V., Kuprikov M.Yu., Kuprikov N.M. Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation: Development Problems and New Management Philosophy. The Polar Journal, 2019, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 445–458. DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2019.1685173
  • Samarina V.P., Samarin A.V., Skufina T.P., Baranov S.V. The Population Settlement in Russia’s Arctic Zone: Facts and Trends. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 302, no. 1, 012081. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012081
  • Skufina T., Bazhutova E., Samarina V., Serova N. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Reserve for the Growth of Entrepreneurial Activity in the Russian Arctic. Humanities & Social Scien. Reviews, 2019, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1024–1031. DOI: 10.18510/hssr.2019.76151
  • Larchenko L.V., Gladkiy Yu.N., Sukhorukov V.D. Resources for Sustainable Development of Russian Arctic Territories of Raw Orientation. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 302. 012121. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012121
  • Samarina V.P., Baranov S.V., Skufina T.P. Osobennosti territorial'noy organizatsii naseleniya re-gionov Severa [Features of the Territorial Organization of the Population of the Regions of the North]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekologiya i prirodopol'zovanie [Bulle-tin of the Tyumen State University. Ecology and Nature Management], 2007, no. 3, pp. 204–212.
  • Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P., Samarin A.V., Baranov S.V. Russia’s agro industrial complex: Economic and political influence factors and state support. In: Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production, 2020, pp. 579–593. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15577-3_55
  • Jennings S., Stentiford G., Leocadio A.M., Jeffery K.R. et al. Aquatic Food Security: Insights into Chal-lenges and Solutions from an Analysis of Interactions between Fisheries, Aquaculture, Food Safety, Human Health, Fish and Human Welfare, Economy and Environment. Fish and Fisheries, 2016, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 893–938. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12152
  • Toropushina E.E. Vliyanie povysheniya pensionnogo vozrasta na izmenenie mediko-demograficheskikh rezervov regionov Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Impact of Rais-ing the Retirement Age on Changes in the Medical and Demographic Reserves of the Regions of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation]. Ekonomika truda [Russian Journal of Labor Economics], 2020, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 617–630. DOI: 10.18334/et.7.7.110367
  • Korchak E.A., Serova N.A., Emelyanova E.E., Yakovchuk A.A. Human Capital of the Arctic: Problems and Development Prospects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, vol. 302. 012078. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012078
  • Zaikov K.S., Kondratov N.A., Kudryashova E.V., Lipina S.A., Chistobaev A.I. Scenarios for the Devel-opment of the Arctic Region (2020–2035). Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], 2019, no. 35, pp. 4–19. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2019.35.5
  • Kryukov V.A., Kryukov Ya.V. Ekonomika Arktiki v sovremennoy sisteme koordinat [The Economy of the Arctic in the Modern Coordinate System]. Kontury global'nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, parvo [Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law], 2019, no. 5, pp. 25–52. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-25-52.
  • Shokhin A.N., Akindinova N.V., Astrov V.Yu., Gurvich E.T., Zamulin O.A., Klepach A.N., Mau V.A., Or-lova N.V. Macroeconomic Effects of the Pandemic and Prospects for Economic Recovery (Proceed-ings of the Roundtable Discussion at the 22nd April International Academic Conference on Econom-ic and Social Development). Voprosy ekonomiki, 2021, no. 7, pp. 5–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-5-30
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©