The employment quality potential of generation groups of workers and the economic sustainability of their households

The employment quality potential of generation groups of workers and the economic sustainability of their households

Автор: Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.16, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The exacerbation of external sanctions pressure on Russia in 2022, which continues to increase at present, has brought to the fore the national agenda of improving the quality of life and standard of living of Russians, achieving national benchmarks in this area and solving problems on the “inner circuit” in the face of new (including existential) challenges. There is a growing need for the development of a scientific and informational basis for the in-depth elaboration of effective responses to the challenges posed. The article presents the results of the research, which continues our developments in the field of studying the relationship between the quality of employment and living standards, focusing on the identification of features in generation groups: young people (up to 35 years), middle generation (36 years - retirement age), the older generation (retirement age). In this study, based on original developments, we have set out with the aim of identifying the unused potential of employment quality in generation groups of workers and its connection with the economic (un)sustainability of households, which determines their standard of living. The empirical basis was the data from the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the HSE and the Comprehensive Monitoring of Living Conditions of the Population by Rosstat. The potential quality of employment of generation groups of workers is revealed, which is determined by the mismatch between education and employment (mismatch between the level of education and specialty, required in the workplace), the presence of precarious employment revealed on the basis of the indicators we have proposed. We consider the dynamics of economic sustainability of workers' households, determined on the basis of our developments and formed by the income from employment in generation groups of workers, as a whole and depending on the characteristics of the quality of employment. The results of this study allow us to update public policy decisions in the areas of employment and vocational education to improve the performance of the chain “education - employment - economic sustainability - standard of living”.

Еще

Generation groups, education, quality of employment, precarious employment, standard of living, economic sustainability of households, social standards, income from employment

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241603

IDR: 147241603   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.3.87.10

Список литературы The employment quality potential of generation groups of workers and the economic sustainability of their households

  • Arvan M.L., Pindek S., Andel S.A. et al. (2019). Too good for your job? Disentangling the relationships between objective overqualification, perceived overqualification, and job dissatisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103323
  • Baskakova M.E., Soboleva I.V. (2017). Employment quality and observance of labour rights in the sphere of small business. Rossiya i sovremennyi mir=Russia and the Contemporary World, 2(95), 57–74 (in Russian).
  • Berten J. (2022). Producing decent work indicators: Contested numbers at the ILO. Policy and Society, 41(4), 458–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac017
  • Bobkov V.N. (Ed.). (2019). Neustoichivaya zanyatost’ v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: teoriya i metodologiya vyyavleniya, otsenivanie i vektor sokrashcheniya [Precarious Employment in the Russian Federation: Theory and Methods of Identification, Evaluation and the Vector of Decreasing]. Moscow: KNORUS.
  • Bobkov V.N., Loktyukhina N.V., Shamaeva E.F. (Eds.). (2022). Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: ot real’nosti k proektirovaniyu budushchego [Standard of Living and Quality of Life in Russia: From Reality to Projecting the Future]. Moscow: FCTAS RAS.
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Bobkov N.V. (2021). The impact of the level and quality of employment in generational groups on the distribution of the working-age population by per capita income. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya=Social and Labor Research, 44(3), 8–20. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2021-44-3-8-20 (in Russian).
  • Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Ivanova T.V., Chashchina T.V. (2022). Significant indicators of precarious employment and their priority. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 18(4), 502–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.7 (in Russian).
  • Burchell B., Sehnbruch K., Piasna A. et al. (2014). The quality of employment and decent work: Definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(2), 459–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet067
  • Campbell I., Price R. (2016). Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualization. The Economic and Labor Relations Review, 27(3), 314–332. DOI:10.1177/1035304616652074
  • Chen S., Ravallion M. (2013). More relatively-poor people in a less absolutely-poor world. Review of Income and Wealth, 59(1), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00520.x
  • Chernykh E.A. (2021). Socio-demographic characteristics and quality of employment of platform workers in Russia and the world. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 14(2), 172–187. DOI: 10.15838/ esc.2021.2.74.11
  • Cutillo A., Raitano M., Siciliani I. (2022). Income-based and consumption-based measurement of absolute poverty: Insights from Italy. Social Indicators Research, 161, 689–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02386-9
  • Decerf B. (2021). Combining absolute and relative poverty: Income poverty measurement with two poverty lines. Social Choice and Welfare, 56, 325–362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01279-7
  • Deeming C. (2011). Determining minimum standards of living and household budgets: Methodological issues. Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783310386825
  • Erdogan B., Bauer T.N. (2020). Overqualification at work: A review and synthesis of the literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 259–283. DOI: 10.1146/ annurev-orgpsych-012420-055831
  • Fokin V.Y. (2013). Impact of the geographical differentiation of the quality and security of population employment on the territorial shrinkage in Perm Krai rural areas. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 6(30), 136–147.
  • García-Pérez C., Prieto-Alaiz M., Simón H. (2017). A new multidimensional approach to measuring precarious employment. Social Indicators Research, 134, 437–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1447-6
  • González P., Sehnbruch K., Apablaza M. et al. (2021). A multidimensional approach to measuring quality of employment (QoE) deprivation in six Central American countries. Social Indicators Research, 158, 107–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02648-0
  • Kolosova A.I., Rudakov V.N., Roshchin S.Yu. (2020). The impact of job-education match on graduate salaries and job satisfaction. Voprosy ekonomiki=Economic Issues, 11, 113–132. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-11-113-132 (in Russian).
  • Korshunova T.Yu. (2020). Remote work agreement as a way to formalize atypical labour relations. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, 2, 112–125. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.021 (in Russian).
  • Kuchenkova A.V., Kolosova E.A. (2018). Differentiation of workers by features of precarious employment. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 288–305. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.15 (in Russian).
  • Leonidova G.V. (2021). The quality of labor potential and employment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 7(5). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2021.5.32.2 (in Russian).
  • Lewchuk W., Laflèche M., Procyk S. et al. (2016). The precarity penalty: How insecure employment disadvantages workers and their families. Alternate Routes, 27, 87–108.
  • Lyutov N.L., Chernykh N.V. (Eds.). (2022). Trudovye otnosheniya v usloviyakh razvitiya nestandartnykh form zanyatosti [Labor Relations in the Development of Non-standard Forms of Employment]. Moscow: Prospekt.
  • Mäkinen L. (2021). Different methods, different standards? A comparison of two Finnish reference budgets. European Journal of Social Security, 23(4), 360–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627211048514
  • Mareeva S., Lezhnina Y. (2019). Income stratification in Russia: What do different approaches demonstrate? Studies of Transition States and Societies, 11(2), 23–46.
  • Mozhina M.A. (1993). Methodological issues of determining the subsistence minimum. Ekonomist=Economist, 2, 44–52 (in Russian).
  • Muñoz de Bustillo R., Fernández-Macías E., Esteve F. et al. (2011). E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators. Socio-Economic Review, 9(3), 447–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr005
  • Ovcharova L.N. (2009). Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie podkhody k otsenke urovnya, profilya i faktorov bednosti: rossiiskii i mezhdunarodnyi opyt [Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Assessing the Level, Profile and Factors of Poverty: Russian and International Experience]. Moscow: M-Studio.
  • Padrosa E., Bolíbar M., Julià M. et al. (2021). Comparing precarious employment across countries: Measurement invariance of the employment precariousness scale for Europe (EPRES-E). Social Indicators Research, 154, 893–915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02539-w
  • Peckham T., Flaherty B., Hajat A. et al. (2022). What does non-standard employment look like in the United States? An empirical typology of employment quality. Social Indicators Research, 163, 555–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02907-8
  • Penne T., Cornelis I., Storms B. (2020). All we need is… reference budgets as an EU policy indicator to assess the adequacy of minimum income protection. Social Indicators Research, 147, 991–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02181-1
  • Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. (2019). Analyzing and classifying the implications of employment precarization: Individual, organizational and social levels. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(6), 182–196. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.10
  • Pun N., Chen P., Jin S. (2022). Reconceptualizing youth poverty through the lens of precarious employment during the pandemic: The case of creative industry. Social Policy and Society, 1–16. DOI:10.1017/S1474746421000932
  • Ravallion M., Chen S. (2019). Global poverty measurement when relative income matters. Journal of Public Economics, 117, 104046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.07.005
  • Rimashevskaya N.M. et al. (1979). Potrebnosti, dokhody, potreblenie. Metodologiya analiza i prognozirovaniya narodnogo blagosostoyaniya [Needs, Income, Consumption. Methodology of Analysis and Forecasting of National Welfare]. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Rzhanitsyna L.S. (2019). Standard of economic sustainability of family a new orientation of income policy. Narodonaselenie=Population, 22(1), 122–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/1561-7785-2019-00009 (in Russian).
  • Sarkisyan G.S., Kuznetsova N.P. (1967). Potrebnosti i dokhod sem’i [Needs and Income of the Family]. Moscow: Ekonomika.
  • Soboleva I.V. (2022). Professional and qualification imbalance as a challenge to economic and social security. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’=Economic Security, 5(3), 989–1008. DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.5.3.114898 (in Russian).
  • Standing G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Tikhonova N.E., Lezhnina Yu.P., Mareeva S.V. et al. (2018). Model’ dokhodnoi stratifikatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva: dinamika, faktory, mezhstranovye sravneniya [The Model of Income Stratification of Russian Society: Dynamics, Factors, Intercountry Comparisons]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.
  • Toshchenko Zh.T. (Ed.). (2021). Prekarnaya zanyatost’: istoki, kriterii, osobennosti [Precarious Employment: Origins, Criteria, Features]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir.
  • Toshchenko Zh.T. (Ed.). (2022). Ot prekarnoi zanyatosti k prekarizatsii zhizni [From precarious employment to precarization of life]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir.
  • Varshavskaya E.Ya. (2021). Overqualification of Russian employees: Scale, determinants, consequences. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 11, 37–48. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016075-5 (in Russian).
  • Veredyuk O.V. (2018). Quality of youth employment in Russia: Analysis of job satisfaction assessments. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 306–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.16 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©