Теоретические подходы к исследованию проблем инкорпорации иммигрантов в принимающее общество

Бесплатный доступ

Статья посвящена анализу основных теоретических подходов, существующих в современной гуманитарной науке, к рассмотрению процесса инкорпорации иммигрантов в принимающее общество. Основное внимание уделяется анализу трех основных теорий: ассимиляции, мультикультурализма и транснационализма. Автором делается вывод о том, что теория иммиграции тяготеет к междисциплинарности и рассмотрению проблематики коммуникации иммигрантов и представителей принимающего общества с индивидуально-групповых, социетальных и политических ракурсов внимания.

Ассимиляция, иммиграция, инкорпорация, мультикультурализм, транснационализм

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170175631

IDR: 170175631

Список литературы Теоретические подходы к исследованию проблем инкорпорации иммигрантов в принимающее общество

  • Alba R., Nee, V., 2003. Remaking the American mainstream. Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Harvard: Harvard University Press
  • Baglay S., Nakache, D., 2014. Immigration federalism in Canada: provincial and territorial nominee programs (PTNPs). In: Baglay, S., Nakache, D., eds. 2014. Immigration regulation in federal states. New York: Springer.
  • Chernilo D., 2006. Social theory’s methodological nationalism: myth and reality, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5-22.
  • Crepaz M.L., 2008. Trust beyond borders: immigration, the welfare state, and identity in modern societies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Faist T., Kivisto T., 2010. Beyond a border: the causes and consequences of contemporary immigration. Thousand Oaks: SAGE/Pine Forge Press.
  • Favell A., 2003. Integration nations: the nationstate and research on immigrants in Western Europe, Comparative Social Research, Vol. 22, pp. 13-42.
  • Jacobson D., Deckard N.D., 2014. Surveying the landscape of integration: Muslim immigrants in the United Kingdom and France, Democracy and Security, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 113-131.
  • Kymlicka, W., 2010. The rise and fall of multiculturalism? New debates on inclusion and accommodation in diverse societies. In: Vertovec S., Wessendorf S., eds., 2010. The multiculturalism backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 32-50.
  • Loch D., 2014. Integration as a sociological concept and national model for immigrants: scope and limits, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 623-632.
  • Meer N., Modood, T. 2012. How does interculturalism contrast with multiculturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 175-196.
  • Modood T., 2013. Multiculturalism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Morawska E., 2009. A sociology of immigration. (Re)Making multifaceted America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nagle J., 2009. Multiculturalism’s double bind: creating inclusivity, cosmopolitanism and difference. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  • Portes A., 2001. Introduction: the debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism, Global Networks, Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181-193.
  • Portes F., Fernández-Kelly P., Haller, W., 2009. The adaptation of the immigrant second generation in America: A theoretical overview and recent evidence, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1077-1104.
  • Portes A., Guarnizo L.E., Landolt P., 1999. The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 217-237.
  • Portes A., Rumbaut R.G. 2006. Immigrant America: a portrait. 3d ed. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Portes A., Zhou M., 1993. The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 530, Interminority Affairs in the U.S.: Pluralism at the Crossroads, pp. 74-96.
  • Quayson A., Daswani G. eds., 2013. A companion to diaspora and transnationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Sager S., 2016. Methodological nationalism, migration and political theory, Political studies, Vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 42-59.
  • Stepick A., Dutton C., 2012. The complexities and confusions of segmented assimilation. In: Schneider J., Crul M. eds., 2012. Theorizing integration and assimilation. New York: Routledge, pp. 7-25.
  • Schiller N.G., 2010. A global perspective on transnational migration: Theorizing migration without methodological nationalism. In: Bauböck, R., Faist, T., 2010. Diaspora and transnationalism: concepts, theories and methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
  • Schiller N.G., Basch L., Blanc C.S., 1995. From immigrant to transmigrant: theorizing transnational migration, Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 48-63.
  • Schiller N.G., Salazar N.B., 2013. Regimes of mobility across the globe, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 183-200.
  • Vermeulen H., 2012. Segmented assimilation and cross-national comparative research on the integration of immigrants and their children. In: Schneider, J., Crul, M. eds., 2012. Theorizing integration and assimilation. New York: Routledge, pp. 71-88.
  • Vertovec S., Wessendorf S. eds., 2009. The multiculturalism backlash. European discourses, policies and practices. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Vertovec S., 2009. Transnationalism. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Walters D., Phytian K., Anisef P., 2007. The acculturation of Canadian immigrants: determinants of ethnic identification with the host society, Canadian Review of Sociology, Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 37-64.
  • Wimmer A., Schiller N.G., 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences, Global Networks, Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 301-334.
  • Бурдье П. Поле науки//Социологическое пространство Пьера Бурдьё . -Режим доступа: http://bourdieu.name/content/burde-pole-nauki
  • Иглтон Т. Идея культуры. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2012.
Еще
Статья научная