Russian scholarly publications in anglophone academic discourse: the clash of tyrannosaurs

Автор: Korotkina Irina B.

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Точка зрения

Статья в выпуске: 2 (91), 2018 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The predominance of English in scholarly publications, recently defined as linguistic imperialism, is no longer considered a threat for multilingual scholars, but a shared linguistic code essential in creating and communicating knowledge. A more significant threat for Russian scholars is the Russian tradition of scholarly writing, which originates from the Soviet period and affects the quality of their national and international publications, especially in humanities and social sciences. The solution is seen in developing writing for academic and research publication purposes in both English and Russian within the umbrella framework of academic literacy. The pioneering role in overcoming the resistance of the deeply rooted tradition and promoting academic writing as a discipline, Russian university writing centers, recently united into the National Consortium, play the central role. Explicit bilingual programmes are especially effective in countries with low level of English, and can be applied to various cultural contexts. They can be further developed into trilingual programmes in post-Soviet states, who experience similar difficulties and for whom Russian remains the lingua franca of academic communication.

Еще

Academic writing, academic discourse, scholarly publication, international scientific communication, english for academic purposes, methods of scientific communication

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147220670

IDR: 147220670   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.091.022.201802.311-323

Список литературы Russian scholarly publications in anglophone academic discourse: the clash of tyrannosaurs

  • Phillipson R. Linguistic imperialism and linguicism. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford, OUP; 1992. p. 50-57.
  • Swales J. English as Tyrannosaurus rex. World Englishes. 1997; 16(3):373-382. DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00071
  • Canagarajah S.A. A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2002. 344 p.
  • Li Y., Flowerdew J. Shaping chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2007; 28(3):100-117.
  • Tardy C. The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004; 3(3):247-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001
  • Cargill M., Burgess S. (eds.) Publishing research in English as an additional language: Practices, Pathways and Potentials. University of Adelaide Press; 2017. 277 p.
  • DOI: 10.20851/english-pathways
  • Popova N.G., Beavitt T.A. English as a means of scientific communication: Linguistic imperialism or interlingua? Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2017; 21(1):54-70.
  • DOI: 10.15507/19919468.086.021.201701.054-070
  • Flowerdew J. English for research publication purposes. Paltridge B. and Starfield S. (eds.). The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 301-322.
  • Bakin E.V. [Academic writing center: experience of establishing]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye vRossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2013; 8-9:112-116. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/articles/102183391 (accessed 18.04.2018). (In Russ.)
  • Squires L.A. The NES writing and communication center: The case for student-oriented writing centers in Russia. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 8-9:66-73. Available at: http://vovr.ru/upload/8-9-16.pdf (accessed 18.04.2018).
  • Bazanova E.M. Laboratory of scholarly communications: Russian perspective. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2015; 8-9:135-143. Available at: http://vovr.ru/upload/8-915.pdf (accessed 18.04.2018). (In Russ.)
  • Korotkina I. Writing centers in Russia: Limitations and challenges. EduRN Social Sciences Education eJournal. 2018; 1. Available at: (accessed 18.04.2018).
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2939495
  • Bastow S., Dunleavy P., Tinkler J. The impact of the social sciences. SAGE Publications; 2014. 344 p.
  • Hewings M. (ed.) Academic writing in context. University of Birmingham University Press; 2001. 250 p.
  • Lillis T., Curry M.J. Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon, Oxford, UK. Routledge; 2010. 224 p.
  • Kuteeva M., Mauranen A. Writing for publication in multilingual contexts: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2014; 13:1-4. Available at: https://www.ntnu.edu/ documents/1263498481/1263810724/Kuteeva & Mauranen - multilingual contexts.pdf/3423c918-4a3b-4914-9efd-9d2cb20dbbc9 (accessed 18.04.2018).
  • Bhabha H.K. The location of culture (Routledge Classics). 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2004. 440 p.
  • Bakhtin М.М. [Issues of literature and aesthetics]. Moscow; 1975. 504 p. (In Russ.)
  • Green B., Beavis C. (eds.) Literacy in 3D: An integrated perspective in theory and practice. ACER Press; 2012. 224 p.
  • Lea M., Jones S. Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education. 2011; 36(4):377-393.
  • DOI: 10.1080/03075071003664021
  • Graff G. Scholars and sound bites: The myth of academic difficulty. PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association of America). 2000; 115(5):1041-1052. Available at: http://courses.wcupa. edu/fletcher/special/graff.htm (accessed 18.04.2018).
  • Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London, Longman; 2000. 232 p.
  • Hyland K. Writing in the academy: Reputation, education and knowledge (Professional Lectures). London: Institute of Education Press; 2007. 28 p.
  • Young A. Teaching writing across the curriculum. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2006. 70 p.
  • Day R.A. How to write and Publish a scientific paper. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; 1994. 296 p.
  • Humanities paper: Epistemological and historical-cultural perspective. Round-table discussion. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 7:46-68. Available at: http://vovr.ru/ upload/7-17.pdf (accessed 18.04.2018). (In Russ.)
  • Humanities paper: Epistemological and historical-cultural perspective. Round-table discussion. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 8-9:74-99. Available at: http://vovr.ru/ upload/8-9-17.pdf (accessed 18.04.2018). (In Russ.)
  • Korotkina I.B. [Academic writing: Process, product and practice]. Moscow: Urait; 2015. 295 p. (In Russ.)
  • Sommers N., Hacker D. A Writer's Reference. 7th ed. Bedford/St.Martin's, 2011. 540 p.
  • Bean J. Engaging ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass; 2011. 384 p.
  • Lynn S. Rhetoric and composition: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 330 p.
  • Kwan B.S.C. An investigation of instruction in research publishing in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education. 2010; 59(1):55-68.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x
  • Korotkina I.B. [Academic writing teaching models: international experience and national practices]. Moscow: Urait; 2018. 219 p. Available at: http://urait.ru/uploads/pdf_review/ED5C8044-2A29-4CCC-8B63-D1194789CBC8.pdf (accessed 18.04.2018).
  • Smith E. Writing centers in multilingual settings. A workbook. Samara: Samara University; 2017. 114 p. point of view
  • Sukharev O.S. [The system of science: dysfunction of management and ways of overcoming it]. Investitsii v Rossii = Investments in Russia. 2015; 7(246):3-14. Available at: http://www.ivrv.ru (accessed 18.04.2018).
  • Frumina E., West R. Internationalization of Russian higher education: the English Language Dimension. Moscow: British Council; 2012. 83 p.
Еще
Статья научная