Reliability of veterinarians routine cattle meat inspection tool on specific identification of cysticerci in bovine muscle tissue

Reliability of veterinarians routine cattle meat inspection tool on specific identification of cysticerci in bovine muscle tissue

Автор: Rutaganira J., Glamazdin I.

Журнал: Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий @vestnik-vsuet

Рубрика: Пищевая биотехнология

Статья в выпуске: 3 (97) т.85, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Cysticercus bovis and macroscopic Sarocysts detected from bovine meat look similar and specific identification of each of these cysts is important for addressing proper preventive, and control measures of tCysticercosis and Sarcocystosis diseases.Therefore, it is sometimes a challenge for Vets to distinguish these two species of parasites during their daily routine meat inspection using traditional methods. Cysticerci and Sarcocysts are responsible of Bovine Cysticercosis and Cattle Sarcocystosis respectively. These Veterinarians can sometimes make errors in identification of these two parasitic species from Cattle meat muscle tissues. The study was conducted from Abattoir in Russian Federation with intention of the problem addressed confirmation. During laboratory experimental examination, it was confirmed that out of 20 cattle muscles tissues sampled from 20 infected bovines reported to contain cysticerci parasites, 5 out of them were Sarcocysts. Therefore, it is obvious for veterinarians to make errors during their routine cattle meat inspection due to the morphological behaviour of these organisms.

Еще

Cestode parasites, cysticercus bovis, foodborne parasites, protozoa, sarcocystis spp, taenia saginata

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/140303243

IDR: 140303243   |   DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2023-3-48-51

Список литературы Reliability of veterinarians routine cattle meat inspection tool on specific identification of cysticerci in bovine muscle tissue

  • Ahmed A.M., Elshraway N.T., Youssef A.I. Survey on Sarcocystis in bovine carcasses slaughtered at the municipal abattoir of El-Kharga, Egypt. Veterinary World. 2016. vol. 9. no. 12. pp. 1461. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.1461-1465
  • Assefa A., Bihon A. Bovine cysticercosis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence from abattoir-based surveys. Preventive veterinary medicine. 2019. vol. 169. pp. 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104707
  • Dubey J.P. Foodborne and waterborne zoonotic sarcocystosis. Food and Waterborne Parasitology. 2015. vol. 1. no.1. pp. 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2015.09.001
  • El-Sayad M.H., Farag H., El-Taweel H., Fadly R. et al. Cysticercus bovis in cattle slaughtered in North Egypt: Overestimation by the visual inspection method. Veterinary World. 2021. vol. 14. no. 1. pp. 155. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.155-160
  • Fayer R., Esposito D.H., Dubey J.P. Human Infections with Sarcocystis Species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015. vol. 28. pp. 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00113-14
  • Leal Filho W., Ternova L., Parasnis S.A., Kovaleva M. et al. Climate Change and Zoonoses: A Review of Concepts, Definitions, and Bibliometrics. IJERPH. 2022. vol. 19. pp. 893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020893
  • Lopes W.D.Z., Santos T.R., Soares V.E., Nunes J.L.N. et al. Preferential infection sites of Cysticercus bovis in cattle experimentally infected with Taenia saginata eggs. Research in Veterinary Science. 2011. vol. 90. pp. 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.04.014
  • Macrelli M., Brena C., Reichel R., Boufana B. et al. Bovine cysticercosis outbreak in an indoor beef finisher farm in the North of England. Veterinary Record Case Reports. 2020. vol. 8. no. 3. pp. e001178. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreccr-2020-001178
  • Novak A., Novak M. Determining the quality of bovine meat in sarcocystosis. theory and practice of parasitic disease control. 2020. pp. 295-300. https://doi.org/10.31016/978-5-9902341-5-4.2020.21.295-300
  • Rosenthal B.M. Zoonotic Sarcocystis. Research in Veterinary Science. 2021. vol. 136. pp. 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.008
  • Uchendu G.O., Aganga A.O., Ama N.O., Madibela O.R. Investigation of Cysticercosis bovis prevalence using passive abattoir post-mortem inspection and active administration of structured non-participatory questionnaire to farmers in Botswana. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021. vol. 53. pp. 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02447-8
  • Picard B., Gagaoua M. Muscle fiber properties in cattle and their relationships with meat qualities: An overview. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2020. vol. 68. no. 22. pp. 6021-6039. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02086
  • Joo S.T., Kim G.D., Hwang Y.H., Ryu Y.C. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat science. 2013. vol. 95. no. 4. pp. 828-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.044
  • Weber R., Herold C., Hollert H., Kamphues J. et al. Reviewing the relevance of dioxin and PCB sources for food from animal origin and the need for their inventory, control and management. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2018. vol. 30. pp. 1-42.
  • Mughini-Gras L., Enserink R., Friesema I., Heck M. et al. Risk factors for human salmonellosis originating from pigs, cattle, broiler chickens and egg laying hens: a combined case-control and source attribution analysis. PloS one. 2014. vol. 9. no. 2. pp. e87933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087933
  • Blagojevic B., Antic D. Assessment of potential contribution of official meat inspection and abattoir process hygiene to biological safety assurance of final beef and pork carcasses. Food Control. 2014. vol. 36. no. 1. pp. 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.08.018
  • Tizioto P.C., Decker J.E., Taylor J.F., Schnabel R.D. et al. Genome scan for meat quality traits in Nelore beef cattle. Physiological genomics. 2013. vol. 45. no. 21. pp. 1012-1020.
  • Autio T., Tuunainen E., Nauholz H., Pirkkalainen H. et al. Overview of control programs for non-EU-regulated cattle diseases in Finland. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021. vol. 8. pp. 688936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.688936
  • Agus A., Widi T.S.M. Current situation and future prospects for beef cattle production in Indonesia-A review. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences. 2018. vol. 31. no. 7. pp. 976.
  • Loiko M.R., de Paula C.M., Langone A.C., Rodrigues R.Q. et al. Genotypic and antimicrobial characterization of pathogenic bacteria at different stages of cattle slaughtering in southern Brazil. Meat Science. 2016. vol. 116. pp. 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.01.010
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©