Philosophical background of the cosmological polemics in Contra Manichaeos by John of Damascus

Philosophical background of the cosmological polemics in Contra Manichaeos by John of Damascus

Автор: Vladimir Baranov

Журнал: Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция @classics-nsu-schole

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.15, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This article analyzes the philosophical arguments used by John of Damascus against the Manichaean dualist cosmological system in his Dialogue contra Manichaeos, showing some parallels with his Dialectica, and revealing a common Aristotelian background. The philosophical argument in the Dialogue seems to be a practical application of philosophical doctrines formulated in the Dialectica. From a wider perspective of anti- Manichean polemics used in part for instructional purposes for students of philosophy and theology in Late Antiquity, the conclusion is made that the purpose of the Dialogue was aimed not so much against the Manichaean cosmogony and cosmology, but against the Manichaean theodicy which might have been attractive to some Christians of John’s times.

Еще

John of Damascus, Manichaeism, Aristotle, syllogistic proof, substance, contraries, Neoplatonic education.

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147234438

IDR: 147234438   |   DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-2-573-594

Список литературы Philosophical background of the cosmological polemics in Contra Manichaeos by John of Damascus

  • Ables, S. (2019) “The Purpose of the Anti-Manichaean Polemic of John of Damascus,” Paper read at the August 2019 Oxford Patristics Conference in the “More than a Compiler: Workshop on John of Damascus.” https://www.academia.edu/1035013/The_Purpose_of_the_Anti_Manichaean_Polemic_of_John_of_Damascus. - Accessed January 12, 2021.
  • Awad, N. G. (2018) Umayyad Christianity. John of Damascus as a Contextual Example of Identity Formation in Early Islam, Islamic History and Thought 12, Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.
  • Baran Tekin, D. (2017) “Mani and His Teachings according to Islamic Sources: An Introductory Study,” in: Lieu, S. N. C., Pedersen, N. A., Morano, E., Hunter, E., eds. Manichaeism East and West, Corpus Fontium Manichaeorum. Analecta Manichaica 1, Turnhout: Brepols, 1-9.
  • Baranov, V. A. (2019) “Human Destiny and Divine Providence in Two Byzantine Authors of the Early Eighth Century,” Scrinium. Journal of Patrology and Critical Hagiography 15, 3-29.
  • Bechtle, G. (2013) “‘Harmonizing’ Aristotle’s Categories and Plato’a Parmenides before the Background of Natural Philosophy,” in: Corrigan, K., Rasimus, T., eds., Gnosticism, Platonism, and the Late Ancient World: Essays in Honour of John B. Turner, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 82, Leiden: Brill, 543-568.
  • Bennett, B. (1997) The Origin of Evil. Didymus the Blind’s Contra Manichaeos and Its Debt to Origen’s Theology and Exegesis, Ph.D. Dissertation, Toronto.
  • Bennett, B. (2001) “Iuxta unum latus erat terra tenebrarum: The Division of Primordial Space in Anti-Manichaean Writers’ Descriptions of the Manichaean Cosmogony,” in: Mirecki, P., BeDuhn, J., eds., The Light and the Darkness: Studies in Manichaeism and its World, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 50, Leiden: Brill, 68-78.
  • Bennett, B. (2009) “The Conversation of John the Orthodox with a Manichaean: An Analysis of its Sources and Its Significance for Manichaean Studies,” in: BeDuhn, J. D., ed., New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the Sixth International Congress on Manichaeism, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 64, Leiden: Brill, 29-44.
  • Bennett, B. (2015) “The Physics of Light, Darkness and Matter in John the Grammarian’s First Homily against the Manichaeans: Early Byzantine Anti-Manichaean Literature as a Window on Controversies in Later Neoplatonism,” in: Richter, S. G., Horton. C., Ohlhafer, K., eds. Mani in Dublin. Selected Papers from the Seventh International Conference of the International Association of Manichaean Studies in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, 8–12 September 2009, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 88, Leiden: Brill, 19-33.
  • Bennett, B. (2021) “The Afterlife of Manichaeism in Neoplatonic Education,” in: Manichaeism and Early Christianity. Selected Papers from the 2019 Pretoria Congress and Consultation. van Oort, J., ed., Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 99) Leiden: Brill, 401-431.
  • Bermejo, F. (2015) “Primal Man, Son of God: From Explicit to Implicit Christian Elements in Manichaeism,” in: Richter, S. G., Horton, C., Ohlhafer, K., eds. Mani in Dublin. Selected Papers from the Seventh International Conference of the International Association of Manichaean Studies in the Chester Beatty Library, Dublin, 8–12 September 2009, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 88, Leiden: Brill, 34-46.
  • Bertaina, D. (2011) Christian and Muslim Dialogues: The Religious Uses of a Literary Form in the Early Islamic Middle East, Gorgias Eastern Christian Studies 29, Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.
  • Betancourt, R. (2018) Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brière, M., ed. and transl. (1960) Les Homiliae cathedrales de Sévère d'Antioche: Homélies CXX à CXXV. Patrologia Orientalis 138 (29.1), Paris: Firmin-Didot.
  • Brinkmann, A., ed. (1895) Alexandri Lycopolitani Contra Manichaei opiniones disputatio. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • Chase, F. H., Jr., transl. (1958) Saint John of Damascus. Writings, Fathers of the Church Patristic Series 37, Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press.
  • Coyle, J. K. (2009a) “Good Tree, Bad Tree: The Matthean/Lukan Paradigm in Manichaeism and Its Opponents,” in: Idem., Manichaeism and Its Legacy, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 69, Leiden: Brill, 65–88.
  • Coyle, J. K. (2009b) “The Idea of the ‘Good’ in Manichaeism,” in: Idem., Manichaeism and Its Legacy (Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 69), Leiden: Brill, 51-64.
  • Dick, I., ed. (1982) Théodore Abuqurra: Traité de l’existence du Créateur et de la vraie religion, Patrimoine arabe chrétien 3, Rome: Pontificio Istituto Oriental.
  • Dillon, J. (2008) “Monist and Dualist Tendencies in Platonism before Plotinus,” ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole) 1, 37-50.
  • Erismann, C. (2010) “A World of Hypostases: John of Damascus's. Rethinking of Aristotle's Categorical Ontology,” Studia Patristica 50, 251-269.
  • Erismann, C. (2017) “Logic in Byzantium,” in: Kaldellis, A., Sinissoglou, N., eds., The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 362-380.
  • Esmailpour A. (2005) Manichaean Gnosis and Creation Myth, Sino-Platonic Papers 156, Philadelphia, PA: Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Fox, G., Sheldon, J., and Lieu, S. N. C. (2010) Greek and Latin Sources on Manichaean Cosmogony and Ethics, Corpus Fontium Manichaeorum, Series Subsidia 6, Turnhout: Brepols.
  • Gardner, I. and S. N. C. Lieu, eds. (2004) Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giet, S., ed. transl., and intro. (1950) Basile de Césarée, Homélies sur l’Hexaéméron, Sources chrétiennes 26, Paris: Editions du Cerf.
  • Griffith, S. (1987) “Free Will in Christian Kalām: The Doctrine of Theodore Abū Qurrah,” Parole de l’Orient 14, 79-107.
  • Griffith, S. (1992) “Disputes with Muslims in Syriac Christian Texts: From Patriarch John (d. 648) to Bar Hebraeus (d. 1286),” in: Lewis B., Niewöhner, F., eds, Religionsgespräche im Mittelalter, Wolfenbütteler Mittelalter-Studien 4, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 251-273.
  • Griffith, S. (2000) “Disputing with Islam in Syriac: the Case of the Monk of Bêt Halê and a Muslim Emir,” Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 3.1, 29-54.
  • Griffith, S. (2006) “The Church of Jerusalem and the ‘Melkites’: The Making of an ‘Arab Orthodox’ Christian Identity in the World of Islam (750–1050 ce),” in: Limor, O., Stroumsa, G. G., eds. Christians and Christianity in the Holy Land, Cultural Encounters in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages 5, Turnhout: Brepols, 175-204.
  • Griffith, S. (2011) “John of Damascus and the Church in Syria in the Umayyad Era: The Intellectual and Cultural Milieu of Orthodox Christians in the World of Islam,” Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 11.2, 207–238.
  • Griffith, S. (2016) “The Manṣūr Family and Saint John of Damascus: Christians and Muslims in Umayyad Times,” in: Borrut A., Donner F. M., eds. Christians and Others in the Umayyad State, Late Antique and Medieval Islamic Near East 1, Chicago, Il.: The University of Chicago, 29-51.
  • Ierodiakonou, K (2014) “Galen’s Theory of Vision,” in: Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. Wildberding, J., eds. Philosophical Themes in Galen, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 114, London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 235-247.
  • Ierodiakonou, K. (2020) “Byzantine Theories of Vision,” in: Lazaris S., ed. A Companion to Byzantine Science, Brill’s Companions to the Byzantine World 6, Leiden: Brill, 160-176. Ierodiakonou, K. and D. O’Meara (2008) “The Study of Byzantine Philosophy,” in: Jeffreys, E., Haldon, J., Cormack, R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 711-720.
  • Khosroev, А. L. (2007) Istoriya manikheistva (Prolegomena). Istochniki i issledovaniya [Тhe history of Manichaeism (Prolegomena). Sources and research], Saint Petersburg: Filologicheskij fakul’tet Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta.
  • Klein, W. W. (1991) Die Argumentation in den griechisech christlichen Antimanichaica, Studies in Oriental Religions 19, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. Kotter, B., ed. (1969) Johannes Damascenus. Institution elementaris. Capita philosophica (Dialectica), Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos I, Patristische Texte und Studien 7, Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Kotter, B. ed. (1981) Johannes von Damaskos. Liber de haeresibus. Opera polemica, Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos IV, Patristische Texte und Studien 22, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
  • Lieu, S. N. C. (1985-1986) “Some Themes in Later Roman Anti-Manichaean Polemics I,” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 68.2, 434-472.
  • Lieu, S. N. C. (1986-1987) “Some Themes in Later Roman Anti-Manichaean Polemics II,” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 69, 235-275.
  • Lieu, S. N. C. (1988) Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China: A Historical Survey. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Lieu, S. N. C. (1992) Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China, 2d ed., Wissenschaftliche
  • Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 63, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • Lieu, S. N. C., Sheldon, J. (2011) “Simplicius on Manichaean Cosmogony,” in: van den Berg, J. A. et al., eds. “In Search of Truth”: Augustine, Manichaeism and Other Gnosticism, Studies for Johannes van Oort at Sixty, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 74, Leiden: Brill, 217-228.
  • Lim, R. (1992) “Manichaeans and Public Disputation in Late Antiquity,” Recherches Augustiniennes et Patristiques 26, 233-272.
  • Lim, R. (1995) Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Oxford: University of California Press.
  • Lloyd, A. C. (1955) “Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic: I,” Phronesis 1.1, 58-72.
  • Lloyd, A. C. (1956) “Neo-Platonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic: II,” Phronesis 1.2, 146-160.
  • Lorenz, H. (2007) “The Assimilation of Sense to Sense-Object in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33, 179-220.
  • Louth, A. (2002) St. John Damascene: Tradition and Originality in Byzantine Theology, Oxford Early Christian Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Migne J.-P., ed. (1857-1866) Patrologia Graeca, Paris (PG).
  • Morrow, G. R. (1970) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • O’Brien, D. (1981) “Plotinus and the Gnostics on the Generation of Matter,” in: Blumenthal, H. J., Markus, R. A., eds., Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought, Essays in Honour of A. H. Armstrong, London: Variorum, 108-123.
  • O’Meara, D. (2009) “Transformatsiya metaphiziki v epokhu pozdnei antichnosti” [The Transformation of Metaphysics in Late Antiquity]. ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole) 3.2, 416-432.
  • Pedersen, A. (1989) “Between Essence and Existence, A Paradox of the Manichaean System in the Coptic Texts,” Rivista degli studi orientali 63, 1/3, 45-64.
  • Pedersen, N. A. (2004) Demonstrative Proof in Defence of God—A Study of Titus of Bostra’s Contra Manichaeos: The Work's Sources, Aims and Relation to its Contemporary Theology, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 56, Leiden: Brill.
  • Phillips, J. (2009) “Plotinus on the Generation of Matter,” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3, 103-137.
  • Puech, H.-C. (1979) “Le prince des tenebres et son royaume,” in Idem, Sur le manichéisme et autres essais, Paris: Flammarion, 103-151.
  • Reeves, J. C. Prolegomena to a History of Islamicate Manichaeism, Comparative Islamic Studies. Sheffield, Oakville, CT: Equinox Publishing.
  • Richter, G. (1964) Die Dialektik des Johannes von Damaskus: Eine Untersuch. Des Textes nach seinen Quellen und seiner Bedeutung, Studia Patristica et Byzantina 10, Ettal: Buch-Kunstverlag.
  • Rist, J. M. (1961) “Plotinus on Matter and Evil,” Phronesis 6.2, 154-166.
  • Roman, A., Schmidt, T. S., Pourier, P.-H., Crégheur, É., Declerck, J. H., eds. (2013) Titi Bostrensis Contra Manichaeos Libri IV: Graece et Syriace, Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 82, Turnhout: Brepols.
  • Ross, W. D. (1975) Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Roueché, M. (1974) “Byzantine Philosophical Texts of the Seventh Century,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 23, 61–76.
  • Roueché, M. (1980) “A Middle Byzantine Handbook of Logic Terminology,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 29, 71-98.
  • Schadler, P. John of Damascus and Islam. Christian Heresiology and the Intellectual Background to Earliest Christian-Muslim Relations, History of Christian-Muslim Relations 34, Leiden, Brill.
  • Schreiber, S. G. (2003). Aristotle on False Reasoning. Language and the World in the Sophistical Refutations, SUNY series in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Smagina, E. (2011) “The Manichaean Cosmogonical Myth as a ‘Re-written Bible’,” in: van den Berg J. A. et al., eds. “In Search of Truth”: Augustine, Manichaeism and Other Gnosticism, Studies for Johannes van Oort at Sixty, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 74, Leiden: Brill, 201-216.
  • Stroumsa, S., Stroumsa, G. (1988) “Aspects of Anti-Manichaean Polemics in Late Antiquity and Under Early Islam,” Harvard Theological Review 81.1, 37-58.
  • Szilágyi, K. (2009) “A Prophet Like Jesus? Christians and Muslims Debating Muhammad’s Death,” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 36, 131-171.
  • Szilágyi K. (2015) “Review of Bertaina, D. Christian and Muslim Dialogues: The Religious Uses of a Literary Form in the Early Islamic Middle East, Gorgias Eastern Christian Studies 29, Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2011,” Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 18.1, 287-306.
  • Tannous, J. B. V. (2010) Syria between Byzantium and Islam: Making Incommensurables Speak, vol. 1, Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.
  • Tardieu, M. (2008) Manichaeism, DeBevoise, M. B., transl., Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Troje, L. (1948) “Zum Begriff ΑΤΑΚΤΟΣ ΚΙΝΗΣΙΣ bei Platon und Mani,” Museum Helveticum 5, 96-115.
  • van der Horst, P. W., Mansfeld, J., transl. with intro. and notes (1974) An Alexandrian Platonist against Dualism: Alexander of Lycopolis’ Treatise “Critique of the Doctrines of Manichaeus.” Leiden: Brill. van Oort, J. (2013) “Alexander of Lycopolis, Manichaeism and Neoplatonism,” in: Corrigan, K., Rasimus, T., eds., Gnosticism, Platonism, and the Late Ancient World: Essays in Honour of John B. Turner, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 82, Leiden: Brill, 275-283.
  • Van Roey, A. (1944) “La Lettre apologétique d’Élie à Léon, syncelle de l'évêque chalcédonien de Harran,” Le Muséon 57, 1-52.
  • van Winden, J. C. M. (1963) “In the Beginning: Some Observations on the Patristic Interpretations of Genesis 1, 1,” Vigiliae Christianae 17, 105-121.
  • van Winden, J. C. M. (1997) “In the Beginning: Early Christian Exegesis of the Term Arche in Genesis 1:1, Inaugural Address, Leiden 1967 (translated from the Dutch),” in: den Boeft, J., Runia, D. T., eds., Arche: A Collection of Patristic Studies, Vigiliae Christianae, Supplements 41, Leiden: Brill, 78-93.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©