On stoic self-contradictions: vs. in Chrysippus (SVF III, 289)

Бесплатный доступ

In this article, I offer an analysis of Chrysippus’ treatment of “injustice” (ἀδικία) in SVF III, 289. First, I show that he espouses two theses: I) Every injustice is an act of harming those who suffer it; II) One who does injustice to others thereby does it to oneself. Then I discuss the two most plausible interpretations of II): a) One who does “conventional” injustice to others, i.e. causes them non-moral harm, thereby does “moralistic” injustice to oneself, i.e. makes oneself morally worse; b) One who does “moralistic” injustice to others thereby does it to oneself. I show that a) is untenable because the Stoics reject the very notion of non-moral harm, and b) fails because they believe that moral harm is basically self-regarding.

Еще

Ancient ethics, chrysippus, harm, injustice, stoicism

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147215850

IDR: 147215850

Список литературы On stoic self-contradictions: vs. in Chrysippus (SVF III, 289)

  • Babut, D., Casevitz, M., ed. (2004) Plutarque. Oeuvres morales. T. XV. 1 partie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
  • Cherniss, H., ed. (1976) Plutarch's Moralia. Vol. XIII. Part I. 1033A-1086B. Cambridge, London: Harvard UP, William Heinemann LTD.
  • Forschner, M. (1981) Die stoische Ethik: über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprach- und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
  • Lόpez, A.D., Sánchez R.C., tr. (2004) Plutarco. Obras morales y de costumbres. XI. Tratados platόnicos. Tratados antiestoicos. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
  • Opsomer, J. (2017) "Is Plutarch Really Hostile to the Stoics?" in T. Engberg-Pedersen (ed.) From Stoicism to Platonism. The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE-100 CE. New York: Cambridge UP, 296-321.
  • Pohlenz, M. (1939) "Plutarchs Schriften Gegen die Stoiker", Hermes 74. 1, 1-33.
  • Tzekourakis, D. (1974) Studies in the Terminology of Early Stoic Ethics. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Статья научная