Методические проблемы развития интраоперационного нейромониторинга при оперативной коррекции деформаций позвоночника (обзор литературы)

Методические проблемы развития интраоперационного нейромониторинга при оперативной коррекции деформаций позвоночника (обзор литературы)

Автор: Сайфутдинов Марат Саматович, Скрипников Александр Анатольевич, Савин Дмитрий Михайлович, Очирова Полина Вячеславовна, Третьякова Анастасия Николаевна

Журнал: Гений ортопедии @geniy-ortopedii

Рубрика: Обзор литературы

Статья в выпуске: 1, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Анализ литературы, посвящённой использованию интраоперационного нейрофизиологического мониторинга в процессе коррекции деформаций позвоночника, показал, что основной тренд развития данного метода направлен на увеличение количества используемых модальностей тестирования. Это порождает усложнение процедуры контроля и в некоторых случаях приводит к неоднозначности интерпретации получаемых данных. Решению методических проблем способствует алгоритмизация процесса мониторинга и формализация получаемой информации.

Нейрофизиологический мониторинг, вызванные потенциалы, анестезия, деформация позвоночника

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142134621

IDR: 142134621   |   DOI: 10.18019/1028-4427-2017-23-1-102-110

Список литературы Методические проблемы развития интраоперационного нейромониторинга при оперативной коррекции деформаций позвоночника (обзор литературы)

  • Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons/L. Peeling, S. Hentschel, R. Fox, H. Hall, D.R. Fourney//Can. J. Surg. 2010. Vol. 53, No 5. P. 324-328.
  • Gibson P.R. Anaesthesia for correction of scoliosis in children//Anaesth. Intensive Care. 2004. Vol.32, No 4. P. 548-559.
  • Padberg A.M., Bridwell K.H. Spinal cord monitoring: current state of the art//Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 1999. Vol. 30, No 3. P. 407-433.
  • Профилактика неврологических осложнений при хирургической коррекции грубых деформаций позвоночника/В.В. Новиков, М.В. Новикова, С.Б. Цветовский, М.Н. Лебедева, М.В. Михайловский, А.С. Васюра, Д.Н. Долотин, И.Г. Удалова//Хирургия позвоночника. 2011. № 3. С. 66-76.
  • «Threshold-level» multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring/B. Calancie, W. Harris, J.G. Broton, N. Alexeeva, B.A. Green//J. Neurosurg. 1998. Vol. 88, No 3. P. 457-470.
  • Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (tcMMEP) for functional monitoring of motor pathways during scoliosis surgery/H.L. Edmonds Jr., M.P. Paloheimo, M.H. Backman, J.R. Johnson, R.T. Holt, C.B. Shields//Spine. 1989. Vol. 14, No 7. P. 683-686.
  • Spinal Cord Monitoring Data in Pediatric Spinal Deformity Patients With Spinal Cord Pathology/A.W. Aleem, E.D. Thuet, A.M. Padberg, M. Wallendorf, S.J. Luhmann//Spine Deformity. 2015. Vol. 3. P. 88-94.
  • Deletis V., Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts//Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008. Vol. 119, No 2. P. 248-264.
  • Neuromonitoring changes in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a single-institution experience/J. Ferguson, S.W. Hwang, Z. Tataryn, A.F. Samdani//J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 2014. Vol. 13, No 3. P. 247-254.
  • Transcranial motor-evoked potentials combined with response recording through compound muscle action potential as the sole modality of spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery/B. Hsu, A.K. Cree, J. Lagopoulos, J.L. Cummine//Spine. 2008. Vol. 33, No 10. P. 1100-1106.
  • Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine deformity surgery/S.W. Hwang, N.R. Malhotra, C.I. Shaffrey, A.F. Samdani//Spine Deformity. . 2012: 64-70.
  • Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities/D.B. MacDonald, Z. Al Zayed, I. Khoudeir, B. Stigsby//Spine. 2003. Vol. 28, No 2. P. 194-203.
  • Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials/R.E. Minahan, J.P. Sepkuty, R.P. Lesser, P.D. Sponseller, J.P. Kostuik//Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001. Vol. 112, No 8. P. 1442-1450.
  • Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery/L. Pelosi, J. Lamb, M. Grevitt, S.M. Mehdian, J.K. Webb, L.D. Blumhardt//Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002. Vol. 113, No 7. P. 1082-1091.
  • Stecker M.M. A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery//Surg. Neurol. Int. 2012. Vol. 3, Suppl. 3. P. S174-S87.
  • Белова А.Н., Балдова С.Н., Казьмин А.В. Использование интраоперационного нейрофизиологического мониторинга при операциях на позвоночнике и спинном мозге//Вопр. травматологии и ортопедии. 2014. № 2 (9). С. 21-25.
  • Опыт применения интраоперационного нейромониторинга при проведении хирургических вмешательств на позвоночнике/С.Д. Карибай, А.З. Нурпеисов, А.В. Ахметжанов, Р.Ш. Танкачеев, И.Ж. Галиев, Ю.А. Дихтярь, К.К. Ахметов, Б.С. Мустафаев, А.Е. Семенова//Нейрохирургия и неврология Казахстана. 2014. № 1. С. 25-28.
  • The value of somatosensory-and motor-evoked potentials in predicting and monitoring the effect of therapy in spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Prospective randomized study/J. Bednarik, Z. Kadanka, S. Vohánka, L. Stejskal, O. Vlach, R. Schröder//Spine. 1999. Vol. 24, No 15. P.1593-1598.
  • Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients/M.O. Kelleher, G. Tan, R. Sarjeant, M.G. Fehlings//J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2008. Vol. 8, No 3. P. 215-221.
  • Risk factors for false positive transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring alerts during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy/D.H. Kim, J. Zaremski, B. Kwon, L. Jenis, E. Woodard, R. Bode, R.J. Banco//Spine. 2007. Vol. 32, No 26. P. 3041-3046.
  • Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey/M.R. Nuwer, E.G. Dawson, L.G. Carlson, L.E. Kanim, J.E. Sherman//Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995. Vol. 96, No 1. P. 6-11.
  • Jameson L.C. Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials. In: Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals/Eds. A. Koht, T.B. Sloan, J.R. Toleikis. Chapter 2. 2012. XXXVI: 27-45.
  • Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review/A.A. Gonzalez, D. Jeyanandarajan, C. Hansen, G. Zada, P.C. Hsieh//Neurosurg. Focus. 2009. Vol. 27, No 4. P. E6.
  • Роль интраоперационного нейрофизиологического мониторинга в предотвращении развития послеоперационных неврологических осложнений в хирургии сколиотической деформации позвоночника/М.А. Хить, С.В. Колесов, Д.А. Колбовский, Н.С. Морозова//Нервно-мышечные болезни. 2014. № 2. С. 36-41.
  • Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients/D.D. Langeloo, A. Lelivelt, H. Louis Journée, R. Slappendel, M. de Kleuver//Spine. 2003. Vol. 28, No 10. P. 1043-1050.
  • Wassermann E.M. Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population//Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002. Vol. 113, No 7. P. 1165-1171.
  • Sloan T.B. Evoked potentials. Anesthesia and motor evoked potentials monitoring. In: Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery/Eds. V. Deletis, J. Shills J. Academic: San Diego, 2002. P. 451-464.
  • Use of sciatic neurogenic motor evoked potentials versus spinal potentials to predict early-onset neurologic deficits when intervention is still possible during overdistraction/Y. Kai, J.H. Owen, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, D.M. Oakley, Y. Sugioka//Spine. 1993. Vol. 18, No 9. P. 1134-1139.
  • Various mechanisms of spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery/J. Delecrin, J.M. Bernard, Y. Pereon et al. In: Neurological Complications of Spinal Surgery: Proc. of the 11th Intern. GICD Congress, Arcachon, France. 1994. P. 13-14.
  • Гнездицкий В.В. Обратная задача ЭЭГ и клиническая электроэнцефалография. Таганрог, 2000. 680 с.
  • Nuwer M.R. Spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory techniques//J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998. Vol. 15, No 3. P. 183-193.
  • Ben-David B., Haller G., Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential//Spine. 1987. Vol. 12, No 6. P. 536-539.
  • Spinal cord monitoring: Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey/E.G. Dawson, J.E. Sherman, L.E. Kanim, M.R. Nuwer//Spine. 1991. Vol. 16, No 8 Suppl. P. S361-S364.
  • Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery/A.M. Padberg, M.H. Russo, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell, R.M. Komanetsky//J. Spinal Disord. 1996. Vol. 9, No 2. P. 150-158.
  • Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery/D.M. Schwartz, J.D. Auerbach, J.P. Dormans, J. Flynn, D.S. Drummond, J.A. Bowe, S. Laufer, S.A. Shah, J.R. Bowen, P.D. Pizzutillo, K.J. Jones, D.S. Drummond//J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007. Vol. 89, No 11. P. 2440-2449.
  • Impact of anesthesia on transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: a review of the literature/A.C. Wang, K.D. Than, A.B. Etame, F. La Marca, P. Park//Neurosurg. Focus. 2009. Vol. 27, No 4. P. E7.
  • Effects of ketamine and propofol on motor evoked potentials elicited by intracranial microstimulation during deep brain stimulation/H. Furmaga, H.J. Park, J. Cooperrider, K.B. Baker, M. Johnson, J.T. Gale, A.G. Machado//Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014. Vol. 8. P. 89.
  • Assessment of corticospinal and somatosensory conduction simultaneously during scoliosis surgery/D. Burke, R. Hicks, J. Stephen, I. Woodforth, M. Crawford//Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992. Vol. 85, No 6. P. 388-396.
  • Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials/M.R. Nuwer, R.G. Emerson, G. Galloway, A.D. Legatt, J. Lopez, R. Minahan, T. Yamada, D.S. Goodin, C. Armon, V. Chaudhry, G.S. Gronseth, C.L. Harden; American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine//J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012. Vol. 29, No 1. P. 101-108.
  • Somatosensory-and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care/A.M. Padberg, T.J. Wilson-Holden, L.G. Lenke, K.H. Bridwell//Spine. 1998. Vol. 23, No 12. P. 1392-1400.
  • Legatt A.D. Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: results of a survey//J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002. Vol. 19, No 5. P. 454-460.
  • Macdonald D.B. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update//J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2006. Vol. 20, No 5. P. 347-377.
  • Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during 409 lumbosacral surgical procedures in 409 patients/M.A. Sutter, A. Eggspuehler, D. Grob, F. Porchet, D. Jeszenszky, J. Dvorak//Eur. Spine J. 2007. Vol. 16, Suppl. 2. P. S221-S228.
  • Bose B., Sestokas A.K., Schwartz D.M. Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during instrumented anterior cervical fusion//Spine J. 2004. Vol. 4, No 2. P. 202-207.
  • Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery/A.S. Hilibrand, D.M. Schwartz, V. Sethuraman, A.R. Vaccaro, T.J. Albert//J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004. Vol. 86-A, No 6. P. 1248-1253.
  • Effectiveness of EMG use in pedicle screw placement for thoracic spinal deformities/A. Oner, C.G. Ely, J.T. Hermsmeyer, D.C. Norvell//Evid. Based Spine Care J. 2012. Vol. 3, No 1. P. 35-43.
  • Jones S.J., Buonamassa S., Crockard H.A. Two cases of quadriparesis following anterior cervical discectomy, with normal perioperative somatosensory evoked potentials//J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2003. Vol. 74, No 2. P. 273-276.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©