Evaluation of different routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks in scenarios with high-speed mobility

Автор: Antonio Russoniello, Eric Gamess

Журнал: International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security @ijcnis

Статья в выпуске: 10 vol.10, 2018 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The current communication requirements are moving quickly to mobile ad-hoc networks, mainly because of the decreasing cost of wireless networking technology and the increasing capacity to integrate into embedded devices technologies such as WiFi, ZigBee, Bluetooth, and WAVE. It is important to understand the limitation or the strength of each protocol and standard in order to make a better selection decision at the moment of implementing a specific scenario. This paper evaluates how routing protocols perform in mobile scenarios when the speed of nodes is relatively high. Our research shows that reactive routing protocols have a better packet delivery ratio (PDR) than proactive routing protocols. However, proactive routing protocols have a smaller end-to-end delay and hops count.

Еще

Network, Ad-hoc Routing Protocols, Mobile Ad-hoc Networks, 802.11, Simulation, OMNeT++

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15015640

IDR: 15015640   |   DOI: 10.5815/ijcnis.2018.10.06

Список литературы Evaluation of different routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks in scenarios with high-speed mobility

  • M. Bheemalingaiah, M. Naidu, D. Rao, and G. Varaprasad, Energy Aware Node Disjoint Multipath Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Network, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 416-431, 2009.
  • A. Penttinen, Research on Ad Hoc Networking: Current Activity and Future Directions. Networking Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, pp. 1-10, 2015.
  • K. Rakesh and D. Mayank, A Comparative Study of Various Routing Protocols in VANET. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 643-648, July 2011.
  • R. Gupta and H. Aggarwal, Network Density based Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 77, No. 10, pp. 33-39, September 2013.
  • T. Chamberlain, Learning OMNeT++, Packt Publishing, September 2013.
  • Y. Saadi, S. Kafhali, A. Haqiq, and B. Nassereddine, Simulation Analysis of Routing Protocols using Manhattan Grid Mobility Model in MANET, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 15, No. 23, pp. 24-30, May 2012.
  • G. Shankara, E. Jagadeeswararao, U. Jyothsna Priyanka, and T. Indira Proya Darsini, Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols – DSDV, DSR, AODV, AOMDV using ns-2, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 9-18, 2015.
  • P. Gite and S. Thakur, Comparative Study and Simulation Based Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols Using ns-2, International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 29-33, January 2013.
  • W. Mumtaz and B. Niaz, Performance Evaluation of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols through NCTUns 6.0, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 1-4, April 2011.
  • S. Goel and N. Goyal, MANET: Simulation Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol Using ns-3, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 4, April 2017.
  • D. Geetike and S. Tyagi, Performance Analysis of various Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 7378-7382, 2018.
  • M. Shaffatul, A. Riaz, and M. Tarique, Performance Analysis of the Routing Protocols for Video Streaming over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, International Journal of Computer Networks & Communication, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 133-150, May 2012.
  • N. Vetrivelan and A. Reddy, Performance Analysis of Three Routing Protocols for Varying MANET Size, In Proceeding of the 2008 International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vol. II, Hong Kong March 2008.
  • T. Issariyakul and E. Hossain, Introduction to Network Simulator ns-2, Second Edition, Springer, December 2012.
  • J. Burbank, An Introduction to Network Simulator 3, First Edition, Wiley-IEEE Press, March 2018.
  • S. Agrawal, S. Jain, and S. Sharma, A Survey of Routing Attacks and Security Measures in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks, Journal of Computing, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 41-48, January 2011.
  • A. Sharma and N. Rajagopalan, A Comparative Study of BATMAN and OLSR Routing Protocols for MANETs, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 13-17, India, 2013.
  • V. Bhat and P. Shah, Performance Comparison of Ad-Hoc VANET Routing Algorithms, International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 13-19, March 2012.
  • J. Train and S. Savita, Analysis of OLSR, DSR, DYMO Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks using OMNeT++ Simulation, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: Network, Web & Security, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 7-10, 2014.
  • E. Gamess and C. Veracoechea, A Comparative Analysis of Network Simulation Tools, In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Methods (MSV’10), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, July 2010.
  • T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies, A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research, Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing. Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 483-502, 2002.
  • E. Gamess, L. Acosta, and D. Hernández. Analyzing Routing Protocol Performance versus Bitrate in Vehicular Networks. In proceedings of the IEEE Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium 2012 (GIIS 2012), Choroni, Venezuela, December 2012.
  • E. Gamess and M. Chachati. Analyzing Routing Protocol Performance with NCTUns for Vehicular Networks. Indian Journal of Science & Technology, Vol. 7, No. 9, pp. 1391-1402, September 2014.
Еще
Статья научная