Emotive pragmatics of popularisation discourse: the impact of contextualisation on reader's interest

Бесплатный доступ

The paper adheres to the pragmatic approach to emotion processes and focuses on emotion- evocative communication. Its goal is to investigate the impact of contextualisation techniques, which employed by popularisation discourse to induce readers’ interest. The research is carried out in two ways, discourse-pragmatic and experimental. First, by adopting the sociopragmatic view of emotions and using methods of discourse analysis, the paper fleshes out a model of emotion-evocative communication, outlines contextualisation techniques, and introduces text materials. Second, by representing the experimental study, the paper assesses the interest-evoking effect of contextualisation. The experimental study involved 400 undergraduate students. We employed the scaling method (7-point bipolar scales) to measure participants’ attitude to generalised and contextualised text passages. The data analysis applied the Wilcoxon test, the Kolmogorov - Smirnov test, Spearman’s correlation coefficient, the linear regression, and the explanatory factor analysis. The comparing tests reveal that contextualisation promotes reader’s interest in the popularisation text. The findings suggest that contextualisation techniques make the text content more relevant to the reader. Personal relevance - as a kind of mediator - causes interest responses . Beyond that, it was found that that reader’s expectations about text strategies to presents knowledge construct interest- evocative communication. The findings demonstrate how communicative variables combine into the model of emotion-evocative communication.

Еще

Emotive pragmatics, emotion-evocative communication, interest, popularisation, contextualisation

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149142307

IDR: 149142307   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.1.14

Список литературы Emotive pragmatics of popularisation discourse: the impact of contextualisation on reader's interest

  • Alba-Juez L., 2021. Affect and Emotion. Haugh M., Kádár D.Z., Terkourafi M., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 340-362. DOI: 10.1017/9781108954105.019
  • Auer P., 2009. Context and Contextualisation. Verschueren J., Ostman J.-O., eds. Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 86-101.
  • Bakhtawer N., Ghulam F., Dur e N., 2021. Strategies Used by Public Primary School Teachers for Enhancing Students' Curiosity in Science. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 93-101. DOI: 10.26710/jafee.v7i1.1568
  • Bayer M., Ruthmann K., Schacht A., 2017. The Impact of Personal Relevance on Emotion Processing: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Pupillary Responses. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 12, iss. 9, pp. 14701479. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx075
  • Bohn-Gettler C.M., Kaakinen J., 2022. Introduction to the Special Issue on Emotions in Reading, Learning, and Communication. Discourse Processes, vol. 59, iss. 1-2, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/ 0163853X.2021. 1899369
  • Bondi M., 2018. Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation Across Expert Action Games. Weigand E., Kecskes I., eds. From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 137-170. DOI: 10.1075/ds.31.08bon
  • Bowcher W., 2019. Context and Register. Thompson G., Bowcher W., Fontaine L., Schonthal D., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 142-170. DOI: 10.1017/9781316337936.008
  • Burdelski M., 2020. Emotion and Affect in Language Socialization. Pritzker S.E., Fenigsen J., Wilce J.M., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion. London, New York, Routledge, pp. 2848. DOI: 10.4324/9780367855093-3
  • Calsamiglia H., 2003. Popularization Discourse. Discourse Studies, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 139-146. DOI: 10.1177/146144560300500230.
  • Calsamiglia H., van Dijk T.A., 2004. Popularization Discourse and Knowledge About the Genome. Discourse and Society, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 369389. DOI: 10.1177/0957926504043705
  • Connelly D.A., 2011. Applying Silvia's Model of Interest to Academic Text: Is There a Third Appraisal? Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 21, iss. 5, pp. 624-628. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.007
  • Connolly J.H., 2014. The Contextual Component Within a Dynamic Implementation of the FDG Model: Structure and Interaction. Pragmatics, vol. 24, iss. 2, pp. 229-248. DOI: 10.1075/prag.24.2.03con
  • De Beaugrande R., 1982. The Story of Grammar and the Grammar of Stories. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 6, iss. 5-6, pp. 383-422. DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(82)90014-5
  • De Saussure L., Wharton T., 2020. Relevance, Effects and Affect. International Review of Pragmatics, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 183-205. DOI: 10.1163/ 18773109-01202001
  • Firth J.R., 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. London, New York, Toronto, Oxford University Press. 233 p.
  • Gotti M., 2014. Reformulation and Recontextualization in Popularization Discourse. Ibérica, iss. 27, pp. 15-34.
  • Greenaway K.H., Kalokerinos E.K., Williams L.A., 2018. Context is Everything (In Emotion Research). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 12, iss. 6, art. e12393. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12393
  • Griner L.A., Smith C.A., 2000. Contributions of Motivational Orientation to Appraisal and Emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 727-720. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200268007
  • Gumperz J.J., 1992. Contextualization Revisited. Auer A., Luzio A.D., eds. The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 39-53. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.22. 04gum
  • Hayakawa S.I., 1977. Language in Thought and Action. London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd. 307 p.
  • Hidi S., Baird W., 1988. Strategies for Increasing Text-Based Interest and Students' Recall of Expository Texts. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 465-483. DOI: 10.2307/747644
  • Hyland K., 2009. Academic Discourse. English in a Global Context. London, New York, Continuum. 256 p.
  • Hyland K., 2014. Dialogue, Community and Persuasion in Research Writing. Gil-Salom L., Soler-Monreal C., eds. Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1075/ ds.23.02hyl
  • Hyland K., 2019. Foreword: Bringing in the Reader. Sancho Guinda C., ed. Engagement in Professional Genres: Deference and Disclosure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. xi-xiv. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.301.00hyl
  • Lepper C., Stang J., McElvany N., 2021. Gender Differences in Text-Based Interest: Text Characteristics as Underlying Variables. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 57, iss. 2, pp. 537-554. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.420
  • Makkonen-Craig H., 2014. Aspects of Dialogicity: Exploring Dynamic Interrelations in Written Discourse. Karlsson A.-M., ed. Analysing Text and Talk. Uppsala, Uppsala universitet, pp. 99-120.
  • Markey A., Loewenstein G., 2014. Curiosity. Pekrun R., Linnenbrink-Garcia L., eds. International Handbook of Emotions in Education. London, New York, Routledge, pp. 228-245. DOI: 10.4324/ 9780203148211-18
  • Metcalfe J., Riedlinger M., 2019. Public Understanding of Science: Popularisation, Perceptions and Publics. Gruber D.R., Olman L.C., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Science. London, New York, Routledge, pp. 3246. DOI: 10.4324/9781351207836-4
  • Mikk J., 2000. Textbook: Research and Writing. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, Peter Lang. 426 p.
  • Moisander J.K., Hirsto H., Fahy K., 2016. Emotions in Institutional Work: A Discursive Perspective. Organization Studies, vol. 37, iss. 7, pp. 963-990. DOI: 10.1177/0170840615613377
  • Mur-Duenas P., 2021. Engagement Markers in Research Project Websites: Promoting Interactivity and Dialogicity. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 57, iss. 4, pp. 655-676. DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2021-0023
  • Pham L.N., Tin T.B., 2022. Exploring Learner Interest in Relation to Humanistic Language Teaching Materials: A Case from Vietnam. System, vol. 105, iss. 5, art. 102731. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2022. 102731
  • Pinoliad E., 2021. Contextualization in Teaching Short Stories: Students' Interest and Comprehension. Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31-55. DOI: 10.47631/mejress.v2i1.167
  • Piotrovskaya L.A., Trushchelev P.N., 2021. Linguistic Approach to Study of Strategies for Increasing Text-Based Interest. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 108, pp. 276-283. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.05. 02.33
  • Piotrovskaya L.A., Trushchelev P.N., 2022. Communicating Recipient's Emotions: Text-Triggered Interest. Training, Language and Culture, vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 60-74. DOI: 10.22363/ 2521-442X-2022-6-1-60-74
  • Qin W., Uccelli P., 2019. Metadiscourse: Variation Across Communicative Contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 139, pp. 22-39. DOI: 10.1016/ j.pragma.2018.10.004
  • Renninger K.A., Bachrach J.E., Hidi S.E., 2019. Triggering and Maintaining Interest in Early Phases of Interest Development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 23, art. 100260. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.007
  • Renninger K.A., Hidi S.E., 2016. The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement. New York, London, Routledge. 177 p.
  • Renninger K.A., Hidi S.E., 2022. Interest Development, Self-Related Information Processing, and Practice. Theory into Practice, vol. 61, iss. 1, pp. 23-34. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2021.1932159
  • Richards I.A., 2001. Principles of Literary Criticism. London, New York, Routledge. 290 p.
  • Sadoski M., Goetz E.T., Rodriguez M., 2000. Engaging Texts: Effects of Concreteness on Comprehensibility, Interest, and Recall in Four Text Types. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, iss. 1, pp. 85-95. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.85
  • Sadoski M., Paivio A., 2013. Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. London, New York, Routledge. 165 p.
  • Schank R.C., 1979. Interestingness: Controlling Inferences. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 273-297. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-2
  • Schiefele U., Schaffner E., Möller J., Wigfield A., 2012. Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 427-463. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.030
  • Silvia P. J., 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 263 p.
  • Silvia P.J., 2017. Curiosity. O'Keefe P.A., Harackiewicz J.M., eds. The Science of Interest. New York, Springer, pp. 97-106. DOI: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-55509-6_5
  • Scott C., 2021. You Won't Believe What's in This Paper! Clickbait, Relevance and the Curiosity Gap. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 175, pp. 53-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.023
  • Shakhovsky V.I., 2008. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya emotsiy [The Linguistic Theory of Emotions]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 416 p.
  • Shin J., Chang Yu., Kim Yo., 2016. Effects of Expository-Text Structures on Text-Based Interest, Comprehension, and Memory. The SNUJournal of Education Research, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 39-57.
  • Trushchelev P.N., 2022a. Funktsii voprosov v uchebnom tekste (na materiale shkolnykh uchebnikov) [Interrogative Mood in Expository Texts from School Textbooks]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Cherepovets State University Bulletin], iss. 4, pp. 114-130. DOI: 10.23859/19940637-2022-4-109-11
  • Trushchelev P., 2022b. Problemnoe izlozhenie v uchebnom tekste i chitatelskiy interes [Problem-Based Exposition in Textbook and Reader's Interest]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy forum [Siberian Philological Forum], iss. 3, pp. 152-166. DOI: 10.25146/2587-7844-2022-20-3-132
  • Van Dijk T.A., 2014. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 400 p.
  • Van Dijk T.A., 2015. Context. Tracy K., ed. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/9781118611463/ wbielsi056
  • Wade S.E., 2001. Research on Importance and Interest: Implications for Curriculum Development and Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 243-261. DOI: 10.1023/ A:1016623806093
  • Wetherell M., 2012. Affect and Emotion. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, SAGE. 182 p.
  • Wharton T., Bonard C., Dukes D., Sander D., Oswald S., 2021. Relevance and Emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 181, pp. 259-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001
  • Wharton T., De Saussure L., 2022. The Pragmatics of Emotion, Argument and Conflict. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, vol. 46, iss. 1, pp. 664-680. DOI: 10.1515/ 9783110347524-032
  • Wiltschko M., 2021. The Grammar of Interactional Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 265 p.
Еще
Статья научная