Dichotomization as a basis of positive communication analysis in an intercultural context

Бесплатный доступ

The aim of the paper is to investigate the constituent features and mechanisms of positive communication and reveal their correlation with politeness. The study is based on a mixed-method research design including Positive Discourse Analysis, dichotomic division and conversational analysis, and is carried out on the material of the book The Family by Nina Fedorova (1940). The results indicate that the dichotomy positive vs negative attitude is basic for the study and implements the contrast between good and evil, ethical and unethical behaviour. The juxtaposition of attraction vs disattraction refers to the perception of an interlocutor as likable or unlikable. The dichotomy activism vs passivism reflects the willingness or unwillingness to interact, while communication involvement vs alienation is associated with the communicator's engagement in the interlocutor's affairs. The juxtaposition of alterocentrism vs egocentrism indicates whether a communicator is focused on one's own or other people's interests. The dichotomy social support vs social indifference is a reflection of empathy or its absence. In the dichotomy constructive vs destructive communication creative behaviour aimed at resolving a difficult situation is opposed to destructive actions leading to the deterioration or break-up of a relationship. Оne of the most important constituents of positive communication is congruency which denotes authenticityand correspondence of the person's genuine inner selfwith the image addressed to the outer world. Positive communication is intrinsically linked with, though not identical to, politeness. The latter does not act as an aim per se, but is rather a tool employed to make an interaction conflict-free, smooth and harmonious.

Еще

Positive communication, politeness, dichotomies, attraction, communication involvement, alterocentrism, social support, constructive communication

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149143750

IDR: 149143750   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.4.6

Список литературы Dichotomization as a basis of positive communication analysis in an intercultural context

  • Alpatov V. M., 2018. Vezhlivost i etiket (na russkom i yaponskom materiale) [Politeness and Etiquette (On the Material of Russian and Japanese)]. Sharonov I.A., ed. Vezhlivost i antivezhlivost v yazyke i kommunikatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Politeness and Antipoliteness in Language and Communication. Proceedings of an International Conference]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ., pp. 7-12.
  • Bieri J., 1955. Cognitive Complexity-Simplicity and Predictive Behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, no. 51, pp. 263-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043308
  • Bragina N.G., 2018. Vezhlivost kak nevezhlivost: na styke raznykh kulturnykh norm i pravil [Politeness as Impoliteness: On the Junction of the Different Cultural Norms and Rules]. Sharonov I.A., ed. Vezhlivost i antivezhlivostv yazyke i kommunikatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Politeness and Antipoliteness in Language and Communication. Proceedings of an International Conference]. Moscow, Polit. entsikl. Publ., pp. 38-44.
  • Brown P., Levinson S.,1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 345 p.
  • Culpeper J., 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 349-367. DOI: http://doi.org/ 10.1016/ 0378-2166(95)00014-3
  • Culpeper J., 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-72. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
  • Ilyinova E.Yu., 2013. Pragmatika tolerantnosti i takta v sovremennoy publichnoy kommunikatsii [Pragmatics of Tolerance and Tact in Modern Public Communication]. Panchenko N.N., ed. Chelovek v kommunikatsii: ot kategorizatsii emotsiy k emotivnoy lingvistike [Personality in Communication: From Categorisation of Emotions to Emotive Linguistics]. Volgograd, Volgograd. nauch. izd-vo, pp. 206-215.
  • Larina T.V., 2009. Kategoriya vezhlivosti i stil kommunikatsii: Sopostavlenie angliyskikh i russkikh lingvokulturnykh traditsiy [Politeness and Communicative Styles: Comparative Analysis of English and Russian Language and Culture Traditions]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur. 512 p.
  • Leech G., Larina T., 2014. Politeness: West and East. Russian Journal of Linguistics, no 4, pp. 9-34.
  • Leontovich O.A., ed., 2020. Pozitivnaya kommunikatsiya [Positive Communication]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 296 p.
  • Martin J.R., 1999. Grace: The Logogenesis of Freedom. Discourse Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001003
  • Martin J., 2004. Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, no. 49, pp. 179-200.
  • Mirivel J.C., 2014. The Art of Positive Communication: Theory and Practice. New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, Wien. 190 p.
  • Novosyolov M.M., 2010. Dikhotomiya [Dichotomy]. Stepin V.S., Gusejnov A.A., Semigin G.Yu., eds. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. V41. T. 1. A-D [New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In 4 Vols. Vol. 1. A-D ]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., pp. 674-675.
  • Panchenko N.N., 2010. Dostovernost kak kommunikativnaya kategoriya [Veracity as a Communicative Category]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ. 322 p.
  • Ponton D.M., 2023. The meaning of Welcome. Positive Migration Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 134-151. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-33319
  • Rhee S., 2023. Politeness and Impoliteness in Social Network Service Communication in Korea. Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 39-66. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-32031
  • Shakhovsky V.I., 2016. Dissonans ekologichnosti v kommunikativnom kruge: chelovek, yazyk, emotsii [Dissonance of Ecology in a Communicative Circle: People, Language, Emotions]. Volgograd, Polikarpov I. L. Publ. 504 p.
  • Sharonov I.A., ed., 2018. Vezhlivost i antivezhlivost v yazyke i kommunikatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Politeness and Antipoliteness in Language and Communication. Proceedings of an International Conference]. Moscow, Polit. entsikl. Publ. 318 p.
  • Socha T.J., Pitts M.J., eds., 2012. The Positive Side of Interpersonal Communication. New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, Peter Lang Publishing Inc. 355 p.
  • Stibbe, A., 2017. Positive Discourse Analysis: Rethinking Human Ecological Relationships. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Routledge, London. URL: https://core.ac.uk/ download/pdf/81669939.pdf
  • Takhtarova S.S., 2009. Mitigatsiya kak kommunikativnaya kategoriya: kognitivno-diskursivnyy i etnokulturnyy aspekty [Mitigation as a Communicative Category: Cognitive, Discursive and Ethnocultural Aspects]. Volgograd, Volgograd. nauch. izd-vo. 408 p.
  • Velazquez J.A.M., Pulido C.M., eds., 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Positive Communication. Contributions of an Emerging Community of Research on Communication for Happiness and Social Change. New York, London, Routledge. 434 p.
  • Vorkachev S.G., 2004. Schastye kak lingvokulturnyy contsept [Happiness as a Linguacultural Concept]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 192 p.
  • Vorkachev S.G., 2007. Lyubov kak lingvokulturnyj contsept [Love as a Linguacultural Concept]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 288 p.
  • Yan Kai, Zhang Bin, 2023. Predstavlenie o schastye v yazykovom soznanii nositeley russkoy kultury: psikholingvisticheskiy aspekt [The Concept of Happiness in the Linguistic Consciousness of Native Russian Speakers: Psycholinguistic Aspect]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznaniye [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 108-122. DOI: https:IIdoi.orgZ 10.15688jvolsu2.2023.1.9
Еще
Статья научная