Comparative analysis of domestic approaches to compensation for damage caused to water bioresources

Автор: Tortsev Aleksei Mikhailovich, Studenov Igor Ivanovich, Belousov Aleksandr Nikolaevich

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Environmental economics

Статья в выпуске: 5 (53) т.10, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Issues related to renewable natural resources and compensation for damage to resources as a result of economic activities are in the focus of Russian and foreign scientists. The article presents domestic approaches to compensation for harm caused to water bioresources and their habitats. The purpose for the research is to conduct comparative analysis of two existing Russian approaches to compensation for harm caused to water bioresources: as a result of economic activities (construction of facilities, pipeline stringing., etc.) and illegal fishery of water biological resources (poaching). The authors conduct analysis of open data on water biological resources linkage, fishery yield and value characteristics of compensation through artificial reproduction of water bioresources as the main direction of natural resource recovery. The authors use data on the Arkhangelsk and Murmansk oblasts, Republic of Karelia, Komi Republic. They cover the issues of damage compensation from illegal extraction of water bioresources with use of the fixed charge approach...

Еще

Water bioresources, compensation, value, fixed charges, state control

Короткий адрес: https://readera.org/147223978

IDR: 147223978   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.5.53.13

Список литературы Comparative analysis of domestic approaches to compensation for damage caused to water bioresources

  • Belous A.I. Bor'ba s nezakonnym vylovom vodnykh biologicheskikh resursov v usloviyakh Krainego Severa . Kriminologicheskie problemy regionov Krainego Severa , 2015. Pp. 108-112..
  • Velieva D.S. Sushchnost' ekologicheskogo vreda i spetsifika ego vozmeshcheniya: konstitutsionno-pravovoi aspect . Sovremennoe pravo , 2011, no. 5, pp. 43-47..
  • Vodop'yanova T.P., Varapaeva, O.A. O vozmeshchenii vreda, prichinennogo okruzhayushchei srede . Trudy BGTU. Ekonomika i upravlenie , 2012, no. 7, pp. 56-59..
  • Gosudarstvennyi doklad "O sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2015 godu" . Moscow: Minprirody Rossii; NIA-Priroda, 2016. 639 p..
  • Gulak N.V. Ponyatie i pravovye sposoby vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo ekologicheskim pravonarusheniem . Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta , 2015, no. 2 (52), pp. 249-250..
  • Efimov A.B. K probleme osushchestvleniya meropriyatii s tsel'yu kompensatsii ushcherba, nanosimogo planiruemoi khozyaistvennoi deyatel'nost'yu na vodnye bioresursy . Trudy VNIRO, 2015, vol. 153, pp. 175-178..
  • Zhavoronkova N.G., Agafonov, V.B. Pravovye problemy vozmeshcheniya proshlogo (nakoplennogo) ekologicheskogo vreda v sfere nedropol'zovaniya . Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava , 2016, no. 1 (62), pp. 85-92..
  • Kodolova A.V. Publichno-pravovye elementy grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti za vred okruzhayushchei srede . Pravovye problemy vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo okruzhayushchei srede: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (MIIGAiK, IZiSP, 23 marta 2017 g.) . Moscow: MIIGAiK, 2017. 240 p. Pp. 19-24..
  • Lokot' L.I., Nikolaeva A.G. Institut vozmeshcheniya vreda v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh . "Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstvenno-pravovogo stroitel'stva v Rossii", regional'naya nauchnaya konferentsiya, posvyashchennaya Dnyu yurista i Dnyu Konstitutsii Rossii: sbornik statei , 2014. Pp. 72-81..
  • Medvedev P.V., Medvedeva O.E. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' i sovremennye mirovye tendentsii v sfere otsenki i vozmeshcheniya ekologicheskogo ushcherba . Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie , 2015, vol. 7, no. 5 (30), p. 66..
  • Medvedeva O.E. Zadachi otsenki ekologicheskogo ushcherba v Arkticheskoi zone . Arktika i Sever , 2015, no. 18, pp. 131-147..
  • Mokhnachevskii I.I., Kardashevskaya, A.A. Poryadok privlecheniya k imushchestvennoi otvetstvennosti za vred, prichinennyi nezakonnym iz"yatiem ob"ektov zhivotnogo mira . Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie v XXI veke: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika , 2015, no. 16, pp. 19-22..
  • Nasibullin S.N., Khusainova, Z.R. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' za ekologicheskie pravonarusheniya v RF . Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya: problemy i rezul'taty , 2013, no. 4, pp. 298-301..
  • Nikishin V.V. Teoreticheskie problemy vozmeshcheniya ekologicheskogo vreda . Ekologicheskoe parvo , 2009, no. 2/3, pp. 28-32..
  • Belousov A.N. (Ed.). Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po razrabotke i primeneniyu mer po sokhraneniyu vodnykh biologicheskikh resursov v tselyakh vozmeshcheniya vreda pri vedenii khozyaistvennoi i inoi deyatel'nosti. Monografiya . Moscow: Editus, 2016. 272 p..
  • Studenov I.I., Tortsev A.M., Novoselov A.P., Pavlenko V.I. Kompensatsiya ushcherba, nanosimogo vodnym bioresursam evropeiskoi chasti Arktiki . Prirodnye resursy i kompleksnoe osvoenie pribrezhnykh raionov Arkticheskoi zony. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov . Arkhangel'sk, 2016. Pp. 429-433..
  • Tikhonova T.V. Ekosistemnye uslugi: rol' v regional'noi ekonomike i podkhody k otsenke . Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo tsentra UrO RAN , 2016, no. 3 (27), pp. 134-143..
  • Shubin Yu.P. Aktual'nye voprosy vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo okruzhayushchei srede . XX Yubileinye Tsarskosel'skie chteniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii , 2016. Pp. 127-130..
  • Tishkov A.A. (Ed.). Ekonomika sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya . Institut ekonomiki prirodopol'zovaniya . Moscow: GEF proekt "Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya", 2002. 604 p..
  • Yakovlev Yu.V., Zhovtyuk P.I., Sin'ko A.V. Opyt vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinyaemogo ob"ektam zhivotnogo mira i srede ikh obitaniya ot realizatsii proektov khozyaistvennoi deyatel'nosti na territorii Irkutskoi oblasti, a takzhe vsledstvie narusheniya prirodookhrannogo zakonodatel'stva . Baikal'skii zoologicheskii zhurnal , 2015, no. 2 (17), pp. 97-100..
  • Cunha D.R., Moneva J. M. Environmental Reporting of Global Oil Companies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016, issue 158, pp. 84-99.
  • Dickie I., McAleese L., Pearce B., Treweek J. Marine Biodiversity Offsetting -UK Scoping Study. Report to The Crown Estate, 2013.
  • Fernandez D.P., Andrews C.P., Conrecode J.R. Reporting Contingencies: Environmental Liabilities. Journal of Business Case Studies, 2012, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 123-133.
  • Levrel H., Jacob C., Bailly D., Charles M., Guyader O., Aoubid S., Bas A., Cujus A., Frésard M., Girard S., Hay J., Laurans Y., Paillet J., Pérez Agúndez J.A., Mongruel R. The maintenance costs of marine natural capital: A case study from the initial assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in France. Marine Policy, 2014, no. 49, pp. 37-47.
  • Levrel H., Pioch S., Spieler R. Compensatory mitigation in marine ecosystems: Which indicators for assessing the "no net loss" goal of ecosystem services and ecological functions? Marine Policy, 2012, no. 36, pp. 1202-1210.
  • Policy for the Assessment of Civil Administrative Penalties and Permit Sanctions NOAA Office of the General Counsel -Enforcement and Litigation. National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration USA.
  • Refocusing Economic and Other Monetary Instruments for Greater Environmental Impact: How to Unblock Reform in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. OECD Publishing, 2012. 33 p.
  • Tortsev A., Studenov I. The Russian system of public administration by compensation of the damage, caused to water bioresources Arctic zone. Modern European Researches, 2016, no. 3, pp. 118-125.
Еще
Статья научная