Biological fixation of customized implants for post-traumatic acetabular deformities and defects

Автор: Bazlov V. A., Pronskikh A. A., Korytkin A. A., Mamuladze T. Z., Efimenko M. V., Pavlov V. V.

Журнал: Гений ортопедии @geniy-ortopedii

Рубрика: Оригинальные статьи

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.29, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction The number of surgical interventions using additive technologies in medicine has been growing both in Russia and with every year. Due to the development of printing customized implants, the use of standard (imported) designs has decreased by an average of 7 % in the provision of high-tech medical care. However, the issue of the pore size of customized implants for management of post-traumatic defects in the acetabulum remains open.Objective To evaluate the results of the treatment of patients with post-traumatic acetabulum defects and deformities with the implementation in clinical practice of customized implants with structure and size porous surface that are optimal from the point of view of biological fixation.Material and methods Porous implants with different types of porous structure were produced by direct laser sintering using Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy powders. Experimental work was carried out in vitro to determine the ability of living fibroblasts to penetrate the pores of different sizes. Next, the clinical part of this study was conducted in order to determine the signs of biological fixation of customized acetabular implants in a group of patients (n = 30).Results The results of this experiment performed to analyze the penetration of living fibroblasts into the porous structure of implants with different pore size demonstrated that metal structures with a pore size of 400-499 μm can be singled out from all others. Discussion Analysis of the literature data shows that there is no consensus on the structure and size of the pores of a customized implant. In our work, we investigated the ability of human living fibroblasts to penetrate into the surface structure of a customized implant, as a result of which we determined their optimal pore size of 400-499 microns. It should be noted that this study was conducted for a definite anatomical location: the acetabulum. However, it cannot be excluded that the data obtained are relevant for other anatomical locations.Conclusion Management of bone defects in the acetabulum area with customized implants featuring the surface pore size of 400-499 microns is a justified and relevant method. A prerequisite for the use of such implants is strict compliance with the indications for their use, careful preoperative planning and correct positioning.

Еще

Individual implant, porous surface, pore structure, 3D printing technology

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/142240031

IDR: 142240031   |   DOI: 10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-6-609-614

Список литературы Biological fixation of customized implants for post-traumatic acetabular deformities and defects

  • Laird A, Keating JF. Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(7):969-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7
  • Madhu R, Kotnis R, Al-Mousawi A, et al. Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum. The time dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1197-203. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17588
  • Stibolt RD Jr, Patel HA, Huntley SR, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis following acetabular fracture: A systematic review of characteristics, outcomes, and complications. Chin J Traumatol. 2018;21(3):176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.02.004
  • Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP. Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(407):173-186. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00026
  • Grubor P, Krupic F, Biscevic M, Grubor M. Controversies in treatment of acetabular fracture. Med Arch. 2015;69(1):16-20. doi: 10.5455/ medarh.2015.69.16-20
  • Beletskiy AV, Voronovich AI, Murzich AE, et al. Determination of Indications to Surgical Treatment and Choice of Surgical Approaches in Complicated Complex Acetabular Fractures. N.N. Priorov journal of traumatology and orthopedics. 2010;17(4):30-37. (In Russ.)
  • Lai O, Yang J, Shen B, Zhou Z, Kang P, Pei F. Midterm results of uncemented acetabular reconstruction for posttraumatic arthritis secondary to acetabular fracture. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(7):1008-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.026
  • Salama W, Ditto P, Mousa S, et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in the treatment after acetabular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2021-x
  • Solod EJ, Lazarev AF, Sakharnykh IN, Stoyukhin SS. New technologies of Acetabular Osteosynthesis. Medical alphabet. 2014; 11(2): 6-10. (In Russ.)
  • Romanova SV, Pronskikh AA, Mamuladze TZ, et al. Classification of posttraumatic defects and deformations of the acetabulum. Literature review. Modern problems of science and education. 2022;(6-2). doi: 10.17513/spno.32116
  • Toropov SS, Artyukh VA, Bozhkova SA. Possibilities of X-ray diagnostics in preoperative planning in chronic periprosthetic infection of the hip joint. Modern achievements of traumatology and orthopedics: collection of scientific articles. SPb.: RNIITO im. R.R. Vredena Publ.; 2018:244-247.
  • Nikolaev N.S., Malyuchenko L.I., Preobrazhenskaia E.V., et al. Use of customized acetabular components for hip joint arthroplasty in posttraumatic coxarthrosis. Genij Ortopedii. 2019;25(2):207-213. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-2-207-213
  • Kryukov EV, Brizhan LK, Buryachenko BP, Varfolomeev DI. The use of digital planning for hip replacementin the orthopedic department of the "Main military clinical hospital named of N.N. Burdenko" Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Department of traumatology and orthopedics. 2017;3(29):95-99. (In Russ.)
  • Zhang Y, Sun N, Zhu M, et al. The contribution of pore size and porosity of 3D printed porous titanium scaffolds to osteogenesis. Biomater Adv. 2022;133:112651. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2022.112651
  • Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, et al. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;59:690-701. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069
  • Korytkin AA, Orlinskaya NY, Novikova YS, et al. Biocompatibility and Osseointegration of Calcium Phosphate-Coated and Non-Coated Titanium Implants with Various Porosities. Modern technologies in medicine. 2021;13(2):52-57. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17691/stm2021.13.2.06
  • Pronskikh AA, Romanova SV, Lukinov VL, et al. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Post-Traumatic Bone Defects and Acetabular Deformities. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2022;28(4):66-78. doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-2001
  • Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Chiladze IT, et al. Choice of surgical approach for acetabular component's implantation using current classification for arthritis following acetabular fracture. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia. 2011;17(2):37-43. (In Russ.)
  • Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:176-183. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201149.14078.50
  • Wang H, Su K, Su L, et al. The effect of 3D-printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds with various macropore structures on osteointegration and osteogenesis: A biomechanical evaluation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;88:488-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.049
  • Wang X, Xu H, Zhang J. Using personalized 3D printed Titanium sleeve-prosthetic composite for reconstruction of severe segmental bone loss of proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(3):e18784. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018784
  • Zanasi S, Zmerly H. Customised three-dimensional printed revision acetabular implant for large defect after failed triflange revision cup. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(5):e233965. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-233965
  • Wyatt MC. Custom 3D-printed acetabular implants in hip surgery--innovative breakthrough or expensive bespoke upgrade? Hip Int. 2015;25(4):375-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000294
  • Ran Q, Yang W, Hu Y, et al. Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;84:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.010
  • Wang H, Su K, Su L, et al. Comparison of 3D-printed porous tantalum and titanium scaffolds on osteointegration and osteogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104:109908. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109908
  • Li K, Guo A, Ran Q, et al. A novel biocomposite scaffold with antibacterial potential and the ability to promote bone repair. J Biomater Appl. 2021;36(3):474-480?doi: 10.1177/0885328221994448
  • Zheng Y, Han Q, Wang J, et al. Promotion of Osseointegration between Implant and Bone Interface by Titanium Alloy Porous Scaffolds Prepared by 3D Printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(9):5181-5190. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00662
  • Jing Z, Zhang T, Xiu P, et al. Functionalization of 3D-printed titanium alloy orthopedic implants: a literature review. Biomed Mater. 2020;15(5):052003. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab9078
  • Yang S, Jiang W, Ma X, et al. Nanoscale Morphologies on the Surface of 3D-Printed Titanium Implants for Improved Osseointegration: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Nanomedicine. 2023;18:4171-4191. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S409033
  • Wixted CM, Peterson JR, Kadakia RJ, Adams SB. Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021;5(4):e20.00230-11. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00230
Еще
Статья научная