Bench mark prebaked anode production with Russian raw materials

Бесплатный доступ

Expansion of the Russian aluminium smelting is foreseen by using high amperage Rusal prebaked pot technology. For a high productivity of such modern smelters - thanks high amperage but also high current efficiency, but also for low energy consumption - the performance of the prebaked anodes is decisive. Bench mark anode quality is therefore critical for low metal production cost. The intrinsic quality of anodes depends on the raw materials, mainly on the coke properties, and on the production equipment and their operating parameter conditions. Based on a review of the domestic available green cokes, a prediction of the corresponding calcined coke blend and of the prebaked anode properties has been performed. Provided that a state of the art carbon plant installation is available, including the rodding shop for the butts quality, the bench mark quality of the prebaked anodes made with a representative coke blend has been defined. This forecast of the best achievable anode quality will be the basis for technical assessments of the performance of existing and future Russian carbon plants.

Еще

Green coke, calcined coke, butts, carbon plant, prebaked anode quality

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/146115107

IDR: 146115107   |   DOI: 10.17516/1999-494X-2016-9-5-731-743

Список литературы Bench mark prebaked anode production with Russian raw materials

  • Infomine, “Petroleum Coke, Production, Market and forecast in The CIS”, 18th Edition, Moscow May, 2014
  • Buzonov V.Yu. et al. Quality of Russian Petroleum cokes for Aluminium Production//Light Metals 2009. pp. 927 -931
  • Brown Y.R. The Changing Face of Green Petroleum Coke Supply//14th Annual Petcoke Conference. March 2015
  • Fu X. China’s Market and Utilization of Petroleum Coke//13th Annual Petcoke Conference. February 2014
  • Edwards L. et al. Evolution of Anode Grade Coke Quality//Light Metals 2012. pp. 1207 -1212
  • Gagnon A. et al. Impurity Removal from Petroleum Coke//Light Metals 2013. pp. 1057 -1062
  • Stewart M. Petcoke Production: Going Forward, not Falling Back//13th Annual Petcoke Conference. February 2014
  • Hume S. et al. A Model for Petroleum Coke Reactivity//Light Metals 1993. pp. 525 -534
  • Jingli Z. et al. Influence of GPC Properties on the CPC Quality//Light Metals 2013. pp. 1079 -1083
  • Perruchoud R. C. et al. Coke Characteristics from the Refiners to the Smelters//Light Metals 2000. pp. 459 -465
  • Khutoryanskii F.M. et al. Reduction of Coke Ash Content//Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils. 1988. Vol. 24. Issue 10. pp. 417 -420
  • Hume S. M. Anode Reactivity: Influence of Raw Material Properties. R&D Carbon book. 2nd edition 1999
  • Hulse K.L. Anode manufacture: Raw Materials Formulation and Processing Parameters. R&D Carbon Book. 2000
  • Belitskus D., Danka D.J. A Comprehensive determination of effects of Calcined Petroleum Coke Properties on Aluminium Reduction Cell Anode Properties//Light Metals 1989. pp. 429 -442
  • Perruchoud R. et al. Survey on Worldwide Prebaked Anode Quality//Light Metals 2004. pp. 573 -578
  • Meier M. Cracking Behavior of Anodes. R&D Carbon Book. 1996.
  • Jones S.S. et al. Influence of High Sulfur Cokes on Anode Performance. Light Metals. 1979. pp. 553 -574
  • Mannweiler U. et al. High Vanadium Venezuelan Petroleum Coke, a raw material for the Aluminum Industry?//Light Metals 1989. pp. 449 -454
  • Hume S.H. Influence of Petroleum Coke Sulfur Content on the Sodium Sensitivity of Carbon Anodes//Light Metals 1993. pp. 535 -541
  • Edwards L. et al. Use of Shot Coke as an Anode Raw Material//Light Metals 2009. pp. 985 -990
  • Hardin E.E. et al. A Comprehensive Review of the Effects of Calcination at Various Temperatures on Coke Structure and Properties-Part 2//Light Metals 1994. pp. 571 -581
  • Dreyer C., Samanos B. Coke Calcination Levels and Aluminium Quality//Light Metals 1996. pp. 535 -542
  • Garbarino R.M., Tonti R.T. Desulfurization and its Effect on Coke Properties//Light Metals 1993. pp. 517 -520
  • Edwards L.C. et al. A Review of Coke and Anode Desulfurization//Light Metals 2007. pp. 895 -900
  • Neyrey K. et al. Observations on the Coke Air Reactivity Test//Light Metals 2013. pp. 1051 -1056
  • Perruchoud R. et al. Effects of Anode Butts Quality and of Butts Preparation on the Anode Performance//1st International Conference and Workshop on Anode Rodding Plants for Primary Aluminium Smelters, Rekyavik Iceland, 15 -28 September 2001.
  • Fischer W.K. et al. Baking Parameters and the Resulting Anode Quality//Light Metals 1993. pp. 683 -694
  • Abbas H. et al. Desulphurization Control During Baking: Its Impact on Anode Performance and Operational Costs -ALBA’S Experience//Light Metals 2010. pp. 1011 -1014
  • Tordai T. Anode Dusting during the Electrolytic Production of Aluminium. PhD Thesis submitted to the EPFL of Lausanne, Switzerland. 2007. pp. 223 -233
  • Fitchett A.M. et al. The Reduction in Anode Airburn with Protective Covers//Light Metals 1988. pp. 291 -294
  • Taylor M. P. et al. The Impact of Anode Cover Control and Anode Assembly Design on Reduction Cell Performance//Light Metals 2004. pp.199 -206
  • Gudmusson H. Improving Anode Cover Material Quality at Nordural -Quality Tools and Measures//Light Metals 2009. pp. 467 -472
  • Mann V. et al. Increase of Amperage at Sayanogorsk Aluminium Smelter//Light Metals 2008. pp. 281 -285
  • Richards N. Anode Covering Practices//Proceedings Australasian Al Smelting Workshop. 1998. pp. 143 -152
  • Keller F., Sulger P.O. Anode Baking -Baking of Anodes for the Aluminium Industry. R&D Carbon Book, 2nd Edition. 2008. pp. 351 -372
  • “Rosneft and Rusal Intend to Develop Cooperation in Petroleum Coke Supplies”, Rosneft news, April 3, 2013
  • Zavadyak A. et al. Ra-400 Technology development: a New Balance between Productivity and Energy Efficiency//ICSOBA -2014. pp. 340 -350
Еще
Статья научная