Unnamed contract: when to conclude it is dangerous for the company

Бесплатный доступ

The article discusses the issue of using unnamed contracts in economic circulation and gives examples of the qualification of such agreements by arbitration courts. Criteria are given by which one should distinguish between unnamed and mixed contracts as agreements of different legal nature. Based on the analysis carried out, the author comes to the conclusion that the main risk of using unnamed contracts in commercial activities is the risk of re- qualification of an unnamed contract by the court, which can lead to unpredictable negative consequences for each party to the contract.

Unnamed contract, mixed contract, contract between subjects of investment activity, qualification of an unnamed contract, re-qualification of the contract, agreement on the provision of a trading place, risk of using an unnamed contract

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170172447

IDR: 170172447

Статья научная