The rationale for comparative effectiveness of tourist potential realization (case study of the Volga region)

Автор: Polukhina Anna Nikolaevna, Sheresheva Marina Yurevna, Rukomoinikova Vera Pavlovna, Napolskikh Dmitrii Leonidovich

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Regional economy

Статья в выпуске: 5 (47) т.9, 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article presents the analysis of long-term tourism development programs of the Volga Region. Great attention is given to the sector's financing measures set out in development programs. Domestic and foreign tourist potential assessment methods are analyzed. Tourist potential dynamics of the Volga Region is studied based on expert opinion. Using econometric approach the authors study the correlation between tourism investments and incomes of the Volga Region for the past six years - from 2009 to 2014. The analysis was carried out using statistics provided by the Russian Tourism Association and the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation by category of profitability from paid tourist services and from hospitality and catering services. The conducted analysis helped construct the figures showing the differentiation of the Volga regions by tourism investment efficiency and tourist potential realization. It is shown that tourist potential of the territories and its realization are highly differentiated...

Еще

Tourist potential, long-term tourism development program, tourism infrastructure, efficiency of investments, efficiency indicators

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147223867

IDR: 147223867   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2016.5.47.7

Список литературы The rationale for comparative effectiveness of tourist potential realization (case study of the Volga region)

  • Aleksandrova A.Yu. Otsenochnye metody . Geografiya turizma , Moscow: Knorus, 2008, pp. 205-214..
  • Drozdov A.V. Vyyavlenie, otsenka i ispol'zovanie turistskikh resursov Rossii: sovremennaya situatsiya, problemy i puti ikh resheniya . Aktual'nye problemy turizma: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Rossiiskoi mezhdunarodnoi akademii turizma , no. 1, 2007, pp. 228-250..
  • Investitsionnye reitingi regionov Rossii . Available at: http://raexpert.ru/rankings/#r_1108..
  • Orlova V.S., Leonidova E.G. Kompleksnaya otsenka turistskogo potentsiala munitsipal'nykh obrazovanii Vologodskoi oblasti: inform.-analit. zapiska o pervom etape NIR . Vologda, 2011. 86 p..
  • Kuskov A.S. Turistskoe resursovedenie . Moscow: Akademiya, 2008. 208 p..
  • Marchenko G., Machul'skaya E. Klondaik dlya investora. Turizm po polnomu pravu pretenduet na rol' natsional'nogo proekta . Available at: http://www.raexpert.ru/ratings/regions/2005/part5/..
  • Orlova V.S., Leonidova E.G. Turistskii potentsial Vologodskoi oblasti . Problemy razvitiya territorii , issue 4 (56), 2011, pp. 51-57..
  • Robinson B.V. Osobennosti otsenki potentsiala resursov razvitiya turizma . Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy i puti ikh resheniya , 2013, issue 5, pp. 28-33..
  • Sarancha M.A. Metodologicheskie problemy integral'noi otsenki turistsko-rekreatsionnogo potentsiala territorii //Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta , no. 1, 2011, pp. 118-127..
  • Selivanov I.A. Razrabotka sistemnoi modeli kompleksnoi otsenki turistskikh resursov regiona . Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii internet-zhurnal , no. 1, 2006. Available at: http://www.e-rej.ru/publications/107..
  • Ushakova E.O. Voprosy kompleksnoi otsenki turistskikh resursov regiona . Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo , 2012, issue 8, pp. 132-137..
  • Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki. Oborot po dokhodam ot gostinits i restoranov Privolzhskogo okruga . Available at: http://maristat.mari.ru/scripts/dbdpfoInet/DBInet.cgi..
  • Federal'noe agentstvo po turizmu . Available at: http://www.russiatourism.ru/contents/statistika/statisticheskie-dannye-po-rf/..
  • Sheresheva M.Yu., Badzho R. Setevoi podkhod v izuchenii turistskikh destinatsii: novye tendentsii . Initsiativy 21 veka , 2014, no. 2, pp. 58-63..
  • Ashouri P., Fariyadi Sh. Potential Assessment of Nature-Based Tourism Destinations Using MCA Techniques (Case Study: Lavasan-e Koochak). Journal of Environmental Studies, 2010, no. 36, pp. 55-76.
  • Buhalis D. Marketing the Competitive Destination of the Future. Tourism Management, 2000, no. 21 (1), pp. 97-116.
  • Cocklin C., Harte M., Hay J. Resource Assessment for Recreation and Tourism: A New Zealand Example. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1990, no. 19, pp. 291-303.
  • Constantin M., Daniela-Luminia C. Tourism Potential and the Diminishing of Regional Disparities in Romania. Economy and Business Administration, 2009, no. 2, pp. 151-155.
  • D'angella F., Go F. M. Tale of two cities' collaborative tourism marketing: Towards a theory of destination stakeholder assessment. Tourism Management, 2009, no. 30(3), pp. 429-440.
  • Enright M. J., Newton J. Tourism Destination Competitiveness: a Quantitative Approach. Tourism Management, 2004, no. 25(6), pp. 777-788.
  • Polukhina A.N., Rukomoinikova V.P. Development of cluster approach in tourism (Russia case study). Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 2016, volume 14, no. 1, pp. 61-67.
  • Priskin J. Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism: the case of the Central Coast Region of Western Australia. Tourism Management, 2001, no. 22(6), pp. 637-648.
  • Romero R., Homar V. Projections of the climate potential for tourism in Platja de Palma, Spain. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2012, no. 11, pp. 64-82.
Еще
Статья научная