The nature of Chinese and Russian subcultures in urban discourse

Бесплатный доступ

The paper seeks to examine the communicative aspect of modern Chinese and Russian urban subcultures. The nominations of urban social groups representing young people in Russia and China and their connection to modern communication practices are viewed from the perspective of urban communication studies, which provides an opportunity for a new comprehension of issues connected with verbal and nonverbal constituents of urban discourse. The indicates that the subcultures in the Russian urban landscape are reflected in such nominations as фрики (freaki), мажоры (majory), хипстеры (hipstery), брейк-дансеры (break-dancery), байкеры (bikery), etc. The Chinese subcultures are known under such names as shamate, xiaoqingxin, tuyayawenhua, erciyuanyawenhua, egaoyawenhua and many others. We argue that in both countries the unity of social subgroups is based not so much on ideological preferences, but rather on lifestyles, hobbies and interests, many of them formed under the Western influence. The subcultures discussed in the research represent a broad panorama of Chinese and Russian social life. They reflect the sociocultural dynamics of attitudes, values and lifestyles influenced by globalization but acquiring nationally specific features, which transform them into unique sociocultural phenomena.

Еще

Subcultures, nominations, china, Russia, urban communication studies

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149139438

IDR: 149139438   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2021.5.7

Список литературы The nature of Chinese and Russian subcultures in urban discourse

  • Aiello G., Tosoni S., 2016. Going About the City: Methods and Methodologies for Urban Communication Research - Introduction. International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, pp. 1252-1262. Aurigi A., 2005. Making the Digital City. Aldershot,
  • Ashgate Publ. 236 p. Aurigi A., 2012. Reflections Towards an Agenda for Urban-Designing the Digital City. Urban Design International, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 131-144.
  • Bakumova E., Kotelnikova N., 2019. Linguistic Expression of the Social Stratification of Chinese Urban Society. SHS Web of Conferences (The International Scientific and Practical Conference "Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences" (Volgograd, April 23-28, 2019)).
  • Volgograd, s. n. Vol. 69. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20196900011. Bennett A., Kahn-Harris K., 2004. After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture. Basingstoke, Hants., New York, Palgrave Macmillan. 195 p.
  • Chen Fachun, Leontovich O., 2020. A Tale of Two Cities: Historical Narratives in the Russian and Chinese Urban Landscapes. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 78-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.2.7.
  • Encyclopedia of Urban Studies, 2010. Green Bay, University of Wisconsin. 1080 p.
  • Fine G.A., Kleinman S., 1979. Rethinking Subculture: An Interactionist Analysis. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 1-20.
  • Galushina N.S., 2016. Subkultury: yazyki opisaniya v menyayushchihsya sociokulturnyh kontekstah [Subcultures: Description Languages in the Changing Sociocultural Contexts]. RSUH/ RGGU Bulletin: Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 120-135. DOI: 10.28995/2686-7249-2016-2-120-135.
  • Gurevich P.S., 1998. Subkultura [Subculture]. Kul'turologiya. XXvek. V21. T. 2 : enciklopediya [Cultural Studies. 20th Century. In 2 Vols. Vol. 2. Encyclopedia]. Saint Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., pp. 450-453.
  • Hall S., Jefferson T., eds., 2006. Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain. London, Routledge. 292 p.
  • Kotelnikova N.N., 2019. Molodezhnye subkul'tury v mediaurbanisticheskom prostranstve sovremennogo kitayskogo goroda [Youth Subcultures of a Modern Chinese City in the Context of Urban Communication Studies]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoy Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke [Humanities Research in the Russian Far East], vol. 1, pp. 25-32. DOI: 10.24866/1997-2857/2019-1/25-32.
  • Kvyat A.G., 2013. Novye kommunikativnye praktiki v rossiyskih gorodakh [New Communication Practices in Russian Cities]. Dzyaloshinskiy I.M., Pil'gun M.A., eds. Razvitiye russkoyazychnogo mediaprostranstva: kommunikatsionnye i eticheskieproblemy: materialy nauch.-prakt. konf. [Development of the Russian-Language Media Space: Communication and Ethical Problems. Conference Materials]. Moscow, Izd-vo APK i PPRO, pp. 351-360.
  • Kvyat A.G., 2014. Istoriya zarubezhnykh gorodskikh kommunikativnykh issledovaniy [The History of Foreign Urban Communication Studies]. Mediaskop [Mediascope], vol. 4. URL: http:// www.mediascope.ru/1598.
  • Lefebvre H., 1991. The Production of Space. Malden, Blackwell. 464 p. (Original work published in 1974).
  • Leontovich O.A., 2018. The All-Seeing Eye of the City from the Perspective of Urban Communication Studies. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 206-213. DOI: https://doi. org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2018.4.20.
  • Leontovich O.A., 2019. New Forms ofUrban Discourse As a Reflection of Social Change. Communication Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 645-654. DOI: 10.25513/2413-6182.2019.6(3).645-654.
  • Leontovich O.A., 2020. Yazykbolshogo goroda: klyuchevye problemy mediaurbanistiki [Language of a Big City: Key Issues of Urban Communication Studies]. Etnopsikholingvistika [Ethnopsycholinguistics], vol. 3, pp. 19-34. DOI: 10.31249/epl/2020.03.02.
  • Levikova S.I., 2007. Molodezhnaya kul'tura [Youth Culture]. Moscow, Vuzovskaya kniga. 360 p.
  • Mellor J.R., 1977. Urban Sociology in an Urbanized Society. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. 328 p.
  • Omelchenko E.L., 2000. Molodezhnye kul'tury i subkul'tury [Youth Cultures and Subcultures]. Moscow, Institut sotsiologii RAN Publ. 262 p.
  • Parker S., 2015. Urban Theory and the Urban Experience. Encountering the City. London, New York, Routledge. 290 p.
  • Pratt A.C., 2011. The Cultural Contradictions of the Creative City. City, Culture and Society, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 123-130.
  • Sikevich Z.V., 1990. Molodezhnaya kul'tura: «za» i «protiv»: Zametki sotsiologa [Youth Culture: "For" and "Against": Notes of a Sociologist]. Leningrad, Lenizdat Publ. 206 p.
  • Simmel G., 1950. Metropolis and Mental Life. Sociology of Georg Simmel. Chicago, Free Press. 523 p. (Original work published in 1903).
  • Tarantino M., Tosoni S., 2013. Media and the Social Production of Urban Space: Towards an Integrated Approach Towards the Controversial Nature of Urban Space. Media & The City: Urbanism, Technology, Communication. S. l., Cambridge Scholar Publishing, Newcastle Upon Tyne, pp. 2-31. URL: http://hdl.handle. net/10807/46851.
  • The Charter of the New Urbanism. URL: https.www. cnu.org/who-we-are/charter-new-urbanism.
  • Weber M., 1966. General Economic History. New York, Collier Books. 288 p. (Original work published in 1923).
  • Weber M., 1978. The City (Non-Legitimate Domination). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, University of California Press, vol. 2, part 16, pp. 1212-1372 (Original work published in 1922).
  • Wu Yao, 2017. Sravnitelnyi analiz sotsialnykh struktur Rossii i Kitaya [Comparative Analysis of Russian and Chinese Social Structures]. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Ppedagogics], vol. 5, pp. 57-60.
  • Yunakovskaya A.A., 2011. "Jazyk goroda" kak lingvisticheskaja problema ["City Language" As Linguistic Problem]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Herald of Omsk University], vol. 3, pp. 193-197.
  • MW (Cai Qi), WS (Xie Ying), 2008. [Rethinking the Internet Spoof "egao" from the Phenomenon of "Pranking Fuwa"]. [Information Network Security], vol. 6, pp. 50-52.
Еще
Статья научная