The effectiveness of the authorities' activities at the local level in the COVID-19 pandemic (the experience of Russia and China)

Автор: Yi Waigeng, Morev Mikhail V., Ukhanova Yuliya V., Kosygina Kseniya E.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Global experience

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.14, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The qualitative changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic at all levels of the organization of the world community (individual, group, national, global) have actually formed a new social reality. Moreover, this process was of a force majeure nature; it took place in the conditions of a sharp increase in the uncertainty feeling, changes in the lifestyle of almost every person and every particular family, the unpreparedness of world medicine for an adequate response to the global epidemiological challenge, as well as the inevitability of large-scale problems in the economy and politics. The current conditions have become a challenge for the existing systems of public administration. The governments of different countries had to act quickly and decisively in order, on the one hand, to keep the development of the epidemiological situation under control, and on the other hand, to prevent a sharp deterioration of social stability against the background of objectively emerging epidemiological, social and psychological challenges. While the world medicine was urgently accelerating the development of a vaccine against coronavirus infection, the scientific and political community discussed the general strategy for implementing quarantine restrictions. However, against this background, the local community level remained virtually behind the scenes, which, nevertheless, was and still remains the most practical in terms of interaction of population with the authorities. It is at the local level (meaning the regional level, as well as the level of local selfgovernment) that the authorities are more close to the society problems, have the opportunity to interact face-to-face with its representatives, and the population, in turn, can actually participate in activities to improve living conditions (including solving problems caused by the pandemic). The article presents the experience of Russia and China in organizing interaction and evaluating the activities of local authorities by the population. Both countries have shown high efficiency in overcoming the crisis in 2020-2021, so their experience is of considerable interest, primarily in practical terms. The authors of the study have concluded about the importance of public assessment regarding the effectiveness of the activities of local authorities, as well as the prospects for actively involving citizens in solving problems arising against the background of force majeure.


Covid-19 pandemic, local community, public assessment of the effectiveness of public administration, civic engagement, anti-epidemic measures

Короткий адрес:

IDR: 147235427   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.14

Список литературы The effectiveness of the authorities' activities at the local level in the COVID-19 pandemic (the experience of Russia and China)

  • Ilyin V.A., Morev M.V. Efficiency of the state’s “manual” management. Challenges of 2020. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 9–24. (In Russian).
  • Lysenko E.A., Mechikova M.N. Anti-crisis policy of states in the context of overcoming socio-economic consequences COVID-19. Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologii=Herald of Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies, 2020, no. 3 (35), pp. 83–89. DOI:10.24411/2225-8264-2020-10051. (In Russian).
  • Bobyleva A.Z., An'shin V.M., Ptitsyn A.V. New challenges: comparative analysis of international reactive anticrisis measures in response to COVID-19. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik=Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 2020, no. 81, pp. 24–48. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2019-10077. (In Russian).
  • Vasiev M., Bi Kexin, Denisov A., Bocharnikov V. How COVID-19 pandemics influences Chinese economic sustainability. Forsait=Foresight, 2020, no. 2 (Eng.). Available at: (In Russian).
  • Kraemer M. et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science, 2020, vol. 368, no. 6490, pp. 493–497. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb4218
  • Chen S., Yang J., Yang W., Wang C., Baerninghausen T., COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet, 2020, no. 395, pp. 764–766. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30421-9.
  • Yu Liu, Saltman R.B. Policy lessons from early reactions to the COVID-19 virus in China. American Journal of Public Health, 2020, vol. 110, no. 8. pp. 1145–1148. DOI:
  • Tkachev S.V. To the issue of futurology of public administration in the Russian Federation. Obrazovanie i pravo=Education and Law, 2020, no. 9, pp. 48–50. DOI: 10.24411/2076-1503-2020-00550. (In Russian).
  • Dolgov S.I., Savinov Yu.A., Taranovskaya E.V. The impact of the new coronavirus outbreak on international trade. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik=Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 2020, no. 2, pp. 7–18. (In Russian).
  • Chulanova O.L. Actualization of the economy of free employment (gigonomics) – the trend of digital globalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Zhurnal issledovanii po upravleniyu=Journal of Management Studies, 2020, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3–22. (In Russian).
  • Savushkina Yu.V. Railway industry in the conditions of COVID-19. Innovatsii i investitsii=Innovatioin and Investment, 2020, no. 6, pp. 291–293. (In Russian).
  • Leonidova E.G. Russian tourism during the COVID-19: assessing effect of stimulating domestic demand for the country and regions’ economy. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 59–74. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.4. (In Russian).
  • Andreeva O.V. Support for social entrepreneurs during the COVID-19 epidemic in Russia and abroad. Intellektual'nye resursy – regional'nomu razvitiyu=Intellectual Resources – to Regional Development, 2020, no. 2, pp. 297–301. (In Russian).
  • Genkin A.S. Economy during COVID-19: the new world after the pandemic. Informatsiya i innovatsii=Information and Innovation, 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 37–44. (In Russian).
  • Vladislavleva T.B., Kerov V.A. Public administration of regional development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik=Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 2020, no. 83, pp. 22–46. (In Russian).
  • Kul’kova V.Yu. Non-commercial sector and state support for non-profit organizations in the service sector in the Russian Federation in the conditions of the crisis of 2020. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik=Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 2020 no. 80, pp. 5–21. (In Russian).
  • Chubarova T.V., Sharova M.A. State policy as a factor influencing the development of the COVID-19 pandemic: conclusions for Russia. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik=Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 2020, no. 83, pp. 84–107. DOI:10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10110. (In Russian).
  • Osipov G.V. et al. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v usloviyakh pandemii: sotsial'no-politicheskoe polozhenie i demograficheskoe razvitie Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2020 godu: kollektivnaya monografiya [Russian society and the state in the context of the pandemic: the socio-political situation and demographic development of the Russian Federation in 2020: Collective monograph]. Moscow: ITD “PERSPEKTIVA”, 2020. 532 p.
  • Rossiiskoe obshchestvo v usloviyakh pandemii: informatsionno-analiticheskii doklad [Russian Society in the Context of the Pandemic: Information and Analytical Report]. FNISTs RAN. Moscow, 2020. 68 p.
  • Brauner J.M. et al. Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19. Science, 2021, vol. 371, no. 6531.
  • Kalinin A.M., Zasimova L.S., Kolosnitsyna M.G., Khorkina N.A. Social isolation policy during COVID-19 pandemic: what strategies are the most beneficial for the state? Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 2020, no. 4, pp. 7–30. (In Russian).
  • Zhang J. et al. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science, 2020, vol. 368, no. 6498, pp. 1481–1486. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb8001
  • Betsch C. et al. Social and behavioral consequences of mask policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, no. 117 (36), pp. 21851–21853. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011674117
  • Dregalo A.A., Ul'yanovskii V.I. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika sotsial'nogo prostranstva Severa: monografiya [Sociocultural dynamics of the social space of the North: monograph]. Arkhangelsk: SAFU, 2017. 252 p.
  • Markin V.V. Social space of Russia in the regional dimension: sociological analysis, modeling, monitoring In: Tikhonov A.V. (Ed.). Rossiya i mir: global'nye vyzovy i strategii sotsiokul'turnoi modernizatsii. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Moskva, 12-13 oktyabrya 2017 g. [Russia and the world: global challenges and strategies of socio-cultural modernization. Proceedings of an international research-to-practice conference (Moscow, October 12–13, 2017)]. Moscow: FNISTs RAN, 2017. 760 p. (In Russian).
  • Williams R. Keywords. London: Fontana, 1988. 270 p.
  • Zhestyannikov S.G. Public participation as tool for territory development (experience of the Vologda Municipal District of the Vologda Oblast). Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 52–67. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.1.111.3. (In Russian).
  • Gruzdeva M.A. Inclusion of population in digital space: global trends and inequality of Russian regions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 90–104. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.5. (In Russian).
  • Pevnaya M.V. (Ed.). Sotsial'noe uchastie molodezhi v razvitii gorodov: metodologicheskie idei, metodicheskie podkhody i opyt issledovaniya konstruktivnykh praktik: monografiya [Social participation of young people in the development of cities: methodological ideas, methodological approaches and experience in the study of constructive practices: monograph]. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2020. 244 p.
  • Ukhanova Yu.V., Kosygina K.E., Leonidova E.E. Trends and barriers of the development of volunteerism in Vologda. Sotsial’noye prostranstvo=Social Area, 2020, vol. 6, no. 1. Available at: DOI: 10.15838/sa.2020.1.23.2. (In Russian).
  • Ukhanova Yu.V., Leon D., Schelwald R. Charity work of local community: results of the sociological research in the Russian region. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 169–185. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.12. (In Russian).
Статья научная