Telemedicine in modern conditions: the attitude of society and the vector of development

Telemedicine in modern conditions: the attitude of society and the vector of development

Автор: Medvedeva Elena I., Aleksandrova Olga A., Kroshilin Sergei V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The intensive development of information technology and the external challenges, primarily the coronavirus pandemic, have caused a revision of attitudes toward telemedicine. The article is devoted to the study of problems concerning the development of Russian telemedicine, analysis of existing trends and the possibilities of its application, taking into account the development of communication technology and the legal field. Research on this issue is connected, on the one hand, with analyzing modern capabilities of telemedicine technologies and the need for their application in connection with the complex epidemiological situation in a number of Russia’s regions, on the other hand, with the assessment of the level of trust in telemedicine on the part of end users: who, how, when and where can use telemedicine services. The object of our research is telemedicine technology, the subject is the dynamics of perception of new forms of medical services by Russian society. We use a classical approach to studying the problems under consideration: at the first stage, we conduct a comprehensive desk study and analyze secondary information; at the second stage, we collect primary data: on the basis of the developed tools, we conduct an exploratory study of the attitude of Russian society toward telemedicine. The uniqueness and novelty of our findings are due to the comparison of the data concerning the attitude of Russians toward telemedicine, obtained before the outbreak of the pandemic, with the data obtained at the stage of a significant reduction in the incidence of COVID-19 in regions that have become “pilot” ones in the use of telemedicine technologies in primary care in the midst of the epidemic. During data collection and analysis, we applied statistical, mathematical and sociological methods, including content analysis to study legal issues of the possibility of using telemedicine technologies. The study has revealed the main reasons for Russians’ distrust of telemedicine, as well as possible ways and areas of its application in the future to provide medical care to the population. The results obtained can be used to study the application of telemedicine in Russia in the system of training and retraining of medical personnel, as well as by health care organizers, lawyers and other specialists who deal with the application of telemedicine technologies, including at the level of legislative and executive authorities.

Еще

Quality of life, healthcare organization, telemedicine, telemedicine technologies, attitude toward telemedicine, covid-19 pandemic, medical care, legal foundations of telemedicine

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238049

IDR: 147238049   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.11

Список литературы Telemedicine in modern conditions: the attitude of society and the vector of development

  • Aoki N., Dunn K., Johnson-Throop K.A., Turley J.P. (2003). Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health, 9(4), 393–401.
  • Bashshur R. (2007). Telemedicine, history, challenges and transformation. In: Presentation at the Second eHealth Congress, October. Turkey, Antalya, 18–20.
  • Bashshur R.L., Shannon G.W. (2009). History of Telemedicine: Evolution, Context, and Transformation. New York: New Rochelle.
  • Bergmo T.S. (2009). Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation, 7(18). DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-7-18
  • Bogdan I.V., Gurylina M.V., Chistyakova D.P. (2020). Prospects and risks of telemedicine: Survey results. In: Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsial’nom razvitii regionov: sb. dokladov VI Vserossiiskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa (Tyumen’, 14–16 oktyabrya 2020 g.) [Sociology and Society: Traditions and Innovations in Social Development of Regions: Proceedings of the VI All-Russian Sociological Congress (Tyumen, October 14–16, 2020)]. Moscow: ROS; FNISTs RAN. DOI: 10.19181/kongress.2020.307 (in Russian).
  • Charrier N., Zarca K., Durand-Zaleski I., Calinaud C. (2016). Efficacy and cost effectiveness of telemedicine for improving access to care in the Paris region: Study protocols for eight trials. BMC Health Service Research, 8, 16–45. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1281-1
  • Ekeland A.G., Grїttland A. (2015). Assessment of mast in European patient-centered telemedicine pilots. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 31(5), 304–311. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462315000574
  • Grigor’ev A.I., Orlov O.I., Loginov V.A. et al. (2001). Klinicheskaya telemeditsina: monografiya [Clinical Telemedicine: Monograph]. Moscow: Slovo.
  • Hailey D., Roine R., Ohinmaa A. (2002). Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8(1), 1–30.
  • Halpren-Ruder D., Chang A.M., Hollander J.E., Shah A. (2019). Quality assurance in telehealth: Adherence to evidence-based indicators. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 25(7), 599–603. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0149
  • Hersh W.R., Hickam D.H., Severance S.M. et al. (2006). Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(1), 3–31.
  • Kamaev I.A., Levanov V.M., Sergeev D.V. (2001). Telemeditsina: klinicheskie, organizatsionnye, pravovye, tekhnologicheskie, ekonomicheskie aspekty: monografiya [Telemedicine: Clinical, Organizational, Legal, Technological, and Economic Aspects: Monograph]. Nizhny Novgorod: NGMA.
  • Kidholm K., Clemensen J., Caffery L.J., Smith A.C. (2017). The Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST): A scoping review of empirical studies. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23(9), 803–813. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X17721815
  • Kim E.J. et al. (2019). Cardiology electronic consultation (e-consult) use by primary care providers at VA medical centres in New England. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 25(6), 370–377. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18774468
  • Kobrinskii B.A. (2016). Telemeditsina v sisteme prakticheskogo zdravookhraneniya [Telemedicine in the Practical Healthcare System]. Moscow: Berlin: Directmedia.
  • Kroshilin S.V., Medvedeva E.I., Aleksandrova O.A. et al. (2020). Analysis of professional training and demand for nursing staff in the context of modern health policy. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo=Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship, 8(121), 1148–1161. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2020.121.8.230 (in Russian).
  • Levanov V.M., Kirpicheva I.S., Yashin A.A. et al. (2014). Typical mistakes in teleconsultations. Meditsinskii al’manakh=Medical Almanac, 1(31), 15–18 (in Russian).
  • Levanov V.M., Perevedentsev O.V., Sergeev D.V. et al. (2017). Telemedicine legislation: 20 years of development. Zhurnal telemeditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya=Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health, 3 (in Russian).
  • Martin-Khan M. et al. (2011). A systematic review of studies concerning observer agreement during medical specialist diagnosis using videoconferencing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(7), 350–357.
  • Morozov S.P. et al. (2018). Telemedicine-based system for quality management and peer review in radiology. Insights into Imaging, 9(3), 337–341.
  • Morozov S.P., Vladzimirskii A.V., Simenyura S.S. (2020). The quality of primary direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations (by results of testing telemedicine services). Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii=Information technologies for the Physician, 1, 51–62 (in Russian).
  • Resneck J.S. Jr., Abrouk M., Steuer M. et al. (2016). Choice, transparency, coordination, and quality among direct-to-consumer telemedicine websites and apps treating skin disease. JAMA Dermatology, 152(7), 68–75. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1774
  • Shi Z., Mehrotra A., Gidengil C.A. et al. (2018). Quality of care for acute respiratory infections during direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits for adults. Health Affairs (Millwood), 37(12), 20–23. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05091
  • Stolbov A.P. (2015). About the definition and classification of telemedicine services. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii=Information technologies for the Physician, 2, 12–27 (in Russian).
  • Taylor P. (2005). Evaluating telemedicine systems and services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 1, 167–177.
  • Vladzimirskii A.V. (2015). The first 150 years of a telemedicine history. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo obshchestva telemeditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya – Rossiya=Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health, 1(1), 10–16 (in Russian).
  • Vladzimirskii A.V. (2017). Patient initiated direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations: First step for a methodology systematization. Zhurnal telemeditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya=Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health, 2, 109–120 (in Russian).
  • Vladzimirskii A.V. (2019). Istoriya telemeditsiny: stoya na plechakh gigantov (1850–1979) [History of Telemedicine: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (1850–1979)]. Moscow: De`Libri.
  • Vladzimirskii A.V. (2020). Matrix for direct-to-consumer telemedicine quality assessing. Zhurnal telemeditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya=Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health, 6(4), 34–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-4-34-44 (in Russian).
  • Vladzimirskii A.V., Lebedev G.S. (2018). Telemeditsina: monografiya [Telemedicine: Monograph]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media.
  • Vladzimirskii A.V., Morozov S.P., Urvantseva I.A. et al. (2019). Primenenie telemeditsinskikh tekhnologii v kardiologii [Telemedicine in Cardiology]. Surgut: SurGU.
  • Vladzimirskii A.V., Morozov  S. P.,  Simenyura  S. S. (2020). Telemedicine and COVID-19: Quality of patient-initiated teleconsultations in case of acute respiratory disease. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii=Information Technologies for the Physician, 2, 52–63. DOI: 10.37690/1811-0193-2020-2-52-63 (in Russian).
  • Volynskii Yu.D. (1999). Telemedicine is part of the information society. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo=Information Society, 5, 15–21 (in Russian).
  • Voskolovich N.A. (2021). Ekonomika platnykh uslug [Economics of Paid Services]. Moscow: Yurait.
  • Weinstein R.S. et al. (2018). Clinical examination component of telemedicine, telehealth, mhealth, and connected health medical practices. Medical Clinics of North America, 102(3), 533–544.
  • Wootton R., Vladzymyrskyy A., Zolfo M., Bonnardot L. (2011). Experience with low-cost telemedicine in three different settings. Recommendations based on a proposed framework for network performance evaluation. Global Health Action, 4. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.7214
  • Yarasheva A.V., Aleksandrova O.A., Medvedeva E.I. (2020). Problems and prospects of personnel support of the Moscow healthcare system. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(1), 174–190. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.1.67.10 (in Russian).
  • Zheleznyakova I.A., Khelisupali T.A., Omel’yanovskii V.V. et al. (2020). Application of foreign experience of telemedicine services in the Russian Federation. Meditsinskie tekhnologii. Otsenka i vybor=Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice, 2, 26–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20204002126 (in Russian).
  • Zingerman B.V., Shklovskii-Kordi N.E., Vorob’ev A.I. (2017). About telemedicine “Patient to Doctor”. Vrach i informatsionnye tekhnologii=Information Technologies for the Physician, 61–79 (in Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©