Social vulnerability of families with children in modern Russia

Автор: Kalachikova Olga N., Gruzdeva Mariya A.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social development

Статья в выпуске: 2 (62) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

When performing its reproductive function, the family - the main institution for population reproduction - continues to bear increased risks of poverty. The goal of our paper is to study manifestations of social vulnerability of modern Russian families with children. Despite the active demographic policy implemented with the help of national projects since 2006, the actual situation concerning families with children has not undergone any significant changes. The birth of a child continues to reduce the standard of living to the point of crossing the poverty line; the housing market remains inaccessible, and the tools for combining parenthood and professional activities do not work. The resources of an average family do not promote the formation of human potential of the child population that would meet the demands of the knowledge economy and are reduced to a set of primary needs. The existing mechanisms of social support do not guarantee that the life of families with children will actually improve; childcare allowances are not growing and are not focused on achieving any standard of living, even the minimum subsistence level. Having few children becomes a conscious choice against the background of the crisis of marriage, which ceased to serve as a kind of contract according to which the husband is a breadwinner, and the wife gives birth to children and runs the house. Women have become full-fledged actors in the labor market. However, they still face discrimination in this regard. The analysis of gender statistics shows that women who have the same level of education, sphere of activity and official status as men receive an average wage that is one third lower compared to that of men. However, the phenomenon of working wives is not only and not so much a reflection of their desire for professional self-realization. Two working adults in an average family will provide a per capita income at the subsistence level in case they have no more than two children. In addition, satisfaction with the availability and quality of education and health services - the institutions that support the reproduction of the population and human potential - remains far from the desired level. Under the circumstances, the family with children remains one of the most socially vulnerable population groups; this fact requires the revision of the mechanisms of social policy and the principles of the social state in general. Scientific novelty of our study consists in the fact that it analyzes and classifies the manifestations of social vulnerability of modern families with children and puts forward the proposals to improve the social and demographic policy of the state. The findings of our research can be used in the practice of public administration.

Еще

Family, children, state support measures, financial problems, housing problems, social services, reproductive potential, social policy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224160

IDR: 147224160   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.9

Список литературы Social vulnerability of families with children in modern Russia

  • Kalachikova O.N., Gordievskaya A.N. Reproductive behaviour of population: long-term monitoring experience. Voprosy territorial'nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 2014, no. 9 (19). Available at: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/1443. (In Russian)
  • Sinel'nikov A.B. Family and marriage: crisis or modernization? Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 2018, no. 1, pp. 95-113. (In Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A. Social development and modern demographic challenges. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory's Development, 2014, no. 2 (70), pp. 7-17. (In Russian).
  • Arkhangel'skii V.N. Transformation of the birth rate in the real generations of women. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2014, no. 3, pp. 26-41. (In Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N., Korolenko A.V., Barsukov V.N., Natsun L.N., Razvarina I.N., Gruzdeva M.A. Dinamika naseleniya Rossii v XXI veke. Sotsiodemograficheskii analiz: monografiya [Population Dynamics in Russia in the 21st Century. Socio-Demographic Analysis: Monograph]. Vologda: FGBUN VolNTs RAN, 2018. 275 p.
  • Ilyin V.A., Morev M.V., Povarova A.I. Sotsial'noe gosudarstvo v Rossii: problemy i perspektivy: monografiya [Social State in Russia: Problems and Prospects: Monograph]. Vologda: VolNTs RAN, 2018. 229 p.
  • Shabunova A.A., Gruzdeva M.A. Sociocultural factors of social atomization (case study of Vologda Region) Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal "Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem"=Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 2014, no. 7. Available at: http://journal-s.org/index.php/sisp/article/view/7201413
  • Sotsial'naya uyazvimost' v regional'nom soobshchestve: eksklyuziya i sovremennye mekhanizmy ee preodoleniya: monografiya [Social Vulnerability in Regional Communities: Exclusion and Modern Mechanisms for Its Overcoming: Monograph]. Team of authors supervised by V.I. Ilyin. Vologda: FGBUN VolNTs RAN, 2018. 340 p.
  • Gruzdeva M.A., Sotsial'no-kul'turnaya podsistema kak faktor povysheniya regional'noi ustoichivosti: monografiya [Social and Cultural Subsystem as a Factor in Increasing Regional Stability: Monograph]. Under the scientific supervision of A.A. Shabunova. Vologda: VolNTs RAN, 2018. 152 p.
  • Baranenkova T.A. Family in post-Soviet society: socio-economic aspect. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN= Bulletin of RAS Institute of Economics, 2018, no. 2, pp.101-111. (In Russian).
  • Grigor'ev I.A. Tax on bachelors in historical retrospect. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki=Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Theory and Practice, 2017, no. 2 (76), pp. 66-68. (In Russian).
  • Korolenko A.V. Some aspects of the state of a modern "institute of grandmothers": experience of sociological research. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 2018, no. 4 (16). 10.15838/sa. 2018.4.16.3
  • DOI: 10.15838/sa.2018.4.16.3
  • Belova V.A. Planirovanie sem'i: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Family Planning: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. Available at: http://www.manada.ru/med/a-14/180/index.shtml (accessed December 2018). (In Russian).
  • Arkhangel'skii V.N. Current trends the birth rate in Russia and the impact of government support measures. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2017, no. 3, pp. 43-50. (In Russian).
  • Reher D. Economic and social implications of the demographic transition. In: Lee R., Reher D. (Eds.). Demographic Transition and Its Consequences. A supplement to Vol. 37 (2011) of Population and Development Review, pp. 11-33.
  • Lee R. The demographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, no. 17 (4), pp. 167-190.
  • Ovcharova L.N. A new policy to support families with children: a radical breakthrough or the first step? Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya=World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, 2008, no. 2, pp. 41-68. (In Russian).
  • Shevyakov A.Yu. Income inequality as a factor in economic and demographic growth in the future. Innovatsii=Innovation, 2011, no. 1 (147), pp. 7-19. (In Russian).
  • Beglova E.I. Phenomenon of "post-reorganizational" poverty in Russia. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2011, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43-51. (In Russian).
  • Svetlichnaya T.G., Men'shikova L.I. Maternity capital as an economic factor in the formation of social expectations of women with two or more children. Voprosy regulirovaniya ekonomiki=Issues of Economic Regulation, 2017, no. 8, pp. 85-95. (In Russian).
  • Kalachikova O.N. Kalachikova O.N. Socio-hygienic literacy in the system of formation of population's reproductive behavior. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory's Development, 2011, no. 2 (54), pp. 64-71. (In Russian).
  • Lysov A.G., Zakharova I.V., Ivanchikova T.N. The status of men and women in the Vologda oblast. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 2018, no. 3 (15).
  • DOI: 10.15838/sa.2018.3.15.8
  • The power of parity: how advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth. McKinsey Global Institute. URL: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growth
  • Kalachikova O.N., Gruzdeva M.A. Gender stereotypes in the modern family: women and men (on the materials of sociological research). Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve=The Woman in Russian Society, 2019, no. 1, pp. 64-76. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2019.1.6
  • Shabunova A.A., Leonidova G.V. Preschool education as a stage of human capital formation. Sankt-Peterburgskii obrazovatel'nyi vestnik=Saint Petersburg Educational Bulletin, 2018, no. 11-12 (27-28), pp. 18-27. (In Russian).
  • Leonidova G.V., Golovchin M.A., Solov'eva T.S. Public preschool education as assessed by the parent community. Vestnik Moskovskoi mezhdunarodnoi vysshei shkoly biznesa (MIRBIS)=Bulletin of Moscow International Higher Business School MIRBIS, 2018, no. 2 (14), pp. 132-129. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.25634/MIRBIS.2018.2.19
  • Leonidova G.V., Golovchin M.A., Solov'eva T.S. Uchitel' i obrazovatel'naya reforma: vzglyad iz regiona: monografiya [Teacher and the Educational Reform: a View from the Region: Monograph]. Vologda: FGBUN VolNTs RAN, 2018. 178 p. P. 48. (In Russian).
  • Shabunova A.A., Kondakova N.A. Children's health and development: results of a 20-year monitoring. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2014, no. 5 (35), pp. 33-54. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.15838/esc.2014.5.35.3
  • Monakhov M.V. Kachestvo zhizni semei s det'mi i ego vliyanie na zabolevaemost' i invalidizatsiyu detei: avtoref. disser. na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata meditsinskikh nauk [Quality of life of families with children and its impact on morbidity and disability of children: Candidate of Sciences (Medicine) dissertation abstract]. Moscow, 2009. 25 p.
  • Pasovets Y.M. Risks of poverty in the modern Russian conditions. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2015, no. 2 (38), pp. 143-160. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.15838/esc.2015.2.38.9
  • Aleksandrova O.A., Yarasheva A.V. Strengthening selective social policy and the prospects of poverty reduction. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2018, no. 1, pp. 4-19. (In Russian).
  • Abrahamson P. Social Policy in Changing Europe. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press, 1993. 93 p.
  • Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Prinston: Prinston University Press, 1990. 127 p.
  • Rothstein B. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge, 1998. 38 p.
Еще
Статья научная