Social impact assessment as a tool for sustainable development of the Russian Arctic

Автор: Nenasheva Marina V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social development

Статья в выпуске: 2 (62) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In the context of dynamic economic development of the Arctic, one of the strategic tasks is to ensure environmental safety and preserve the conditions and quality of life of the local population. It is possible to solve this problem by conducting environmental impact assessment (EIA) at the stage of economic activity planning, which is mandatory in all Arctic countries. During the EIA process, companies assess possible environmental and related social and economic impact of the planned investment project. For this purpose, appropriate techniques are used, and their number is sufficient to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the impact on the natural environment. At the same time, assessing social impact of economic initiatives is quite a challenge for companies due to the fact that Russia lacks the documents and methodological recommendations that regulate the implementation of such an assessment. This fact is confirmed by the practice of EIA and by scientific research, according to which the assessment of social impact of economic activity is one of the most difficult and least studied issues in modern science. It becomes particularly important to find a solution to this problem for the Russian Arctic, where the indigenous population lives, whose conditions and quality of life largely depend on the state of the environment and preservation of traditional economic activities. In this regard, we set a goal to find an approach to the development of a methodology for forecasting social changes for the Arctic region of Russia. To achieve the goal, we do the following 1) we analyze the existing methodological approaches to assessing the social impact of the planned economic activity in the context of Russian and foreign research, as well as the practice of EIA; 2) we describe a system of indicators of the social environment of the Russian Arctic; 3) we build a matrix of social impact of the planned economic activity. The findings of our study can become the basis for the development of specific techniques, including sectoral methods, to assess social impact of the planned economic activity; these techniques can be used for a comprehensive environmental assessment of the planned economic activity by public and private companies.

Еще

Economic activity, impact, social environment, assessment, social impact, indicator, methodology, russian arctic

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224163

IDR: 147224163   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.12

Список литературы Social impact assessment as a tool for sustainable development of the Russian Arctic

  • Prioritety Rossii v Arktike. Spetsial'nyi doklad k mezhdunarodnomu forumu tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya "Tekhnoprom-2016" [Russia's Priorities in the Arctic. Special Report at the International Forum for Technological Development "Technoprom-2016"]. Novosibirsk, 2016. 64 p.
  • Arctic Business Forum Yearbook 2016. Compiled and edited by Timo Rautajoki. Lapland Chamber of Commerce. Rovaniemi, 2016. 198 p.
  • Rudenko D.Yu. Analysis of demographic processes in the Russian Arctic. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie)=MID (Modernization. Innovation. Development), 2015, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 51-57. - 4665.2015.6.4.51.57. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18184/2079
  • Polovinkin V.N. Human resources - the main problem of development of the North. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika=Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2013, no. 4 (12), pp. 26-31. (In Russian).
  • Vinogradova S.N., Masloboev V.A. Mining in the traditional territories of the indigenous peoples of the North: features, problems, mechanisms of regulation. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika=Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2015, no. 2 (18), pp. 96-103. (In Russian).
  • Laverov N.P., Bogoyavlenskii V.I., Bogoyavlenskii I.V. Fundamental aspects of rational development of oil and gas resources in the Arctic and in the Russian shelf: strategy, prospects and problems. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika=Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2016, no. 2 (22), pp. 4-13. (In Russian).
  • Barrow C.J. Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction. London: Arnold, 2000. 244 p.
  • Vanclay F. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2002, no. 22(3), pp. 183-211.
  • Becker H.A., Vanclay F. The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003. 352 p.
  • Social Impact Assessment. International Association for Impact Assessment. Available at: http://www.iaia.org.
  • Environmental and social framework document. World Bank. Available at: https://consultations.worldbank.org (accessed: 22.03.2018).
  • Koivurova T., Lesser P., Bickford S., Kankaanpää P., Nenasheva M. Environmental Impact Assessment in the Arctic. A Guide to the Best Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2016. 311 p.
  • Gulakov I., Vanclay F. Social impact assessment in the Russian Federation: does it meet the key values of democracy and civil society? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2018, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 494-505.
  • DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1507111
  • Ryabukhina E.V. Otsenka vozdeistviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu [Environmental Impact Assessment]. Yaroslavl: YarGU, 2010. 175 p.
  • Lokosov V.V., Ryumina E.V., Ul'yanov V.V. Population quality and regional economy: direct and indirect correlation. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 32-42. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.1.55.2
  • Anikevich A.G., Elizarov S.A., Yuris S.A. Methodology for assessing the socio-economic consequences of the implementation of strategic management decisions at the regional level Vestnik GGTU im. P.O. Sukhogo=Bulletin of Sukhoi State Technical University of Gomel, 2001, no. 3-4, pp. 100-107. (In Russian).
  • Novikova N.I., Stepanov V.V. Indicators of the quality of life of indigenous peoples of the North of the Sakhalin Oblast. In: Issledovaniya po prikladnoi i neotlozhnoi etnologii [Researches on Applied and Urgent Etnology]. Moscow: IEA RAN, 2010. Vol. 217. Pp.1-43. (In Russian).
  • Shmal' A.G. Faktory ekologicheskoi opasnosti i ekologicheskie riski [Triggers of Environmental Hazards and Environmental risks]. Bronnitsy: IKTs BNTV, 2010. 191 p.
  • Dregalo A.A., Ul'yanovskii V.I. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika sotsial'nogo prostranstva Severa [Sosio-Cultural Dynamics of the Socila Space of the North]. Arkhangel'sk: SAFU, 2017. 252 p.
  • Matveev A.N., Samusenok V.P., Yur'ev A.L. Otsenka vozdeistviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu [Environmental Impact Assessment]. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkut. gos. un-ta, 2007. 179 p.
  • Pitul'ko V.M. (Ed.). Ekologicheskaya ekspertiza [Environmental Assessment]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2010. 528 p.
  • Vizgalov D.V. Metody otsenki munitsipal'nykh programm [Methods for Assessing Municipal Programs]. Moscow: Fond "Institut ekonomiki goroda", 2004. 108 p.
  • Minakir P.A., Leonov S.N. Problems of forecasting the development of the Arctic regions of the Far East. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika=Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2015, no. 1 (17), pp. 10-17. (In Russian).
  • Neveikina N.V. Indicators of socio-economic development of the region. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economy: Theory and Practice, 2013, no. 23 (302), pp. 16-27. (In Russian).
  • Tishkov V.A. (Ed.). Rossiiskaya Arktika: korennye narody i promyshlennoe osvoenie [Russian Arctic: Indigenous Peoples and Industrial Development]. Moscow: Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2016. 272 p.
Еще
Статья научная