Regulation of financial behavior of the population of modern Russia: regulatory context formation and personal development

Автор: Belekhova Galina V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.13, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Making premature financial decisions can negatively affect individual households and society as a whole, so public authorities, using various management mechanisms, regulate the population’s financial behavior. The article attempts to understand how the state regulation of the population’s financial behavior presents interventions in order to “change the context” (in particular, the regulatory and procedural foundations of the financial system) and to “change cognition” (in our case - “human change”, in particular personal knowledge and attitudes). Similar research topics cover the legal basis of financial organizations, behavioral tools for managing the population’s financial behavior, the ways to improve their financial literacy, and so on. In contrast, the present study first reflects the views of alternative economic theories (rational choice theory, behavioral economics) on the possibility of regulating economic behavior, the techniques of behavioral “nudging” widely spread in foreign countries are given; second, a scheme for regulating the financial behavior of the Russian population is proposed and the main regulatory documents regulating the activities of financial organizations in the country are analyzed; third, the relation between the regulation lines of “change the context” and “human change” is estimated. It is shown that the impact on the financial behavior of the Russians is mainly devoted to the “change the context”, i.e. at building a bona fide institutional financial system. The impacts in the line of “human change” are secondary; they are implemented through improving financial literacy and introducing mass financial products. This regulation allows a bias towards the person’s “passivity”. The elimination of the identified imbalance will improve the effectiveness of management decisions regarding the citizens’ financial behavior. It is proposed to redirect interventions from the construction of an “ideal” regulatory context of the financial system to the development of a literate and financially active population, able to form the necessary financial environment for the economy and society by their behavior.

Еще

Financial behavior, government regulation, nudging, change the context, change cognition, financial literacy

Короткий адрес: https://readera.org/147225457

IDR: 147225457   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.8

Список литературы Regulation of financial behavior of the population of modern Russia: regulatory context formation and personal development

  • Pozdyshev V.A. Bank regulation in 2016–2017: Main changes and development prospects. Den’gi i kredit=Russian Journal of Money and Finance, 2017, no. 1, pp. 9–17. (in Russian)
  • Golubtsov V.G. The mechanism of insolvency (bankruptcy) of a citizen under the laws of Russia and the USA: Comparative legal research. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Yurisprudentsiya=Legal Concept, 2016, no. 3 (32), pp. 117–125. (in Russian)
  • Kuzina O.E., Ibragimova D.Kh. Problems of measuring and ways to improve the financial literacy of Russian population. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2008, no. 4 (88), pp. 14–25. (in Russian)
  • Stakhnyuk A.V., Izmalkova E.A. Methods for improving financial literacy of the population (regional aspect). Den’gi i kredit=Russian Journal of Money and Finance, 2014, no. 8, pp. 52–56. (in Russian)
  • Tsvetova G.V., Erofeeva M.V. Increase in financial literacy of the population of Russia: Review of educational projects. Vlast’ i upravlenie na Vostoke Rossii=Power and Administration in the East of Russia, 2017, no. 3 (80), pp. 71–78. (in Russian)
  • Kolesnikova T.N. Impact of cognitive distortions on the behavior of economic agents. Vestnik SGSEU=Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2019, no. 1 (75), pp. 31–35. (in Russian)
  • Golodnikova A.E., Tsygankov D.B., Yunusova M.A. Potential of using «nudge» concept in state regulation. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 2018, no. 3, pp. 7–31. (in Russian)
  • Drogobytsky L.N. Behavioral economics: The essence and stages of formation. Strategicheskie resheniya i riskmenedzhment=Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 2018, no. 1, pp. 26–31. (in Russian)
  • Zlotnikov A. Irrational rationality of Richard Thaler’s new behavioral economy. Nauka i innovatsii=The Science and Innovations, 2018, no. 6 (184), pp. 40–45. (in Russian)
  • Shmakov A.V. The economic comprehensions of human behavior. How to influence the human choice? Shouldyou learn painting if you want to be a painter? can «buba» change economics for the better? Terra economicus=Terra Economicus, 2015, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 96–131. (in Russian)
  • Kapelyushnikov R.I. Behavioral economics and new paternalism (Part I). Voprosy ekonomiki=Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2013, no. 9, pp. 66–90. (in Russian)
  • Kapelyushnikov R.I. Behavioral economics and new paternalism (Part II). Voprosy ekonomiki=Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2013, no. 10, pp. 28–46. (in Russian)
  • Rubinshtein A.Ya., Gorodetsky A.E. State paternalism and paternalist failure in the theory of patronised goods. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii=Journal of Institutional Studies, 2018, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 38–57. (in Russian)
  • Ponomareva S.I. Normative frames of behavioural economics and forms of “behavioural” policy. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2018, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 14–19. (in Russian)
  • Simon H.A. A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99–118.
  • Golman R., Hagmann D., Loewenstein G. Information avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature, 2017, no. 55, pp. 96–135. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20151245
  • Barr M., Mullanaithan S., Shafir E. The case for behaviorally informed regulation. In: New Perspectives on Regulation. Ed. by D. Moss, J. Cistierno. Cambridge, MA: The Tobin Project. 2009. Pp. 25–61.
  • Woodward S.E., Hall R.E. Diagnosing consumer confusion and sub-optimal shopping effort: Theory and mortgage-market evidence. American Economic Review, 2012, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 3249–3276. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3249
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–292.
  • Shefrin H., Statman M. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 1985, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 777–790.
  • Hershfield H.E., Goldstein D.G., Sharpe W.F., Fox J., Yeykelis L., Carstensen L.L., Bailenson J.N. Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, vol. 48, Special issue, pp. S23–S37.
  • Weber E.U., Johnson E.J., Milch K.F., Chang H., Brodscholl J.C., Goldstein D.G. Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query–theory account. Psychological Science, 2007, 18, pp. 516–523. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x
  • Sussman A.B., O’Brien R.L. Knowing when to spend: Unintended financial consequences of earmarking to encourage savings. Journal of Marketing Research, 2016, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 790–803. DOI:10.1509/jmr.14.0455
  • Johnson E., Haubl G., Keinan A. Aspects of endowment: A query theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 461–474. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461
  • Sussman A.B., Olivola C.Y. Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, vol. 48, Special issue, pp. S91–S101.
  • Schwartz J., Luce M., Ariely D. Are consumers too trusting? The effects of relationships with expert advisers. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, vol. 48, Special issue, pp. S163–S174.
  • Beshears J., Choi J., Laibson D., Madrian B., Milkman K. The effect of providing peer information on retirement savings decisions. Journal of Finance, 2015, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1161–1201. DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12258
  • Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review, 2003, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 175–179.
  • Thaler R. Novaya povedencheskaya ekonomika. Pochemu lyudi narushayut pravila traditsionnoi ekonomiki i kak na etom zarabotat’ [Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics]. Translated from English by A.A. Prokhorova. Moscow: Eksmo, 2018. 384 p.
  • Rubinstein A.Ya. Why are some theories not recognized, while others are succesful? “Meritorious Paternalism” of R. Musgrave and “Libertarian Paternalism” of R. Thaler. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal VshE=Higher School of Economics Economic Journal, 2019, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 345–364. (in Russian)
  • Thaler R., Sunstein C. Nudge. Arkhitektura vybora. Kak uluchshit’ nashi resheniya o zdorov’e, blagosostoyanii i schast’e [Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness]. Translated from English by E. Petrova. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2017. 310 p.
  • Yunusova M.Yu., Tsygankov D.B. Institutional trade-offs for nudge unit’s formation in public administration system. In: XIX Aprel’skaya mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva, NIU VShE, 13 aprelya 2018 g. – Sessiya Dc-15. Povedencheskoe podtalkivanie i ekonomicheskaya politika [19th April international academic conference on the issues of economic and social development, Higher School of Economics, April 13, 2018 – Session Dc-15. Behavioural stimulation and economic policy]. Available at: https://events-files-bpm.hse.ru/files/_reports/7E1AC993-47C3-4327-B173-5B675C34D8AD/NudgeUnits_full.pdf (in Russian)
  • Dolan P., Elliott A., Metcalfe R., Vlaev I. Influencing financial behavior: From changing minds to changing contexts. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2012, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 126–142. DOI:10.1080/15427560.2012.680995
  • Madrian B.C., Hershfield H.E., Sussman A.B., Bhargava S., Burke J., Huettel S.A., Jamison J., Johnson E.J., Lynch J.G., Meier S., Rick S., Shu S.B. Behaviorally informed policies for household financial decision-making. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2017, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 27–40.
  • Belyanin A.V. Richard Thaler and behavioral economics: From the lab experiments to the practice of nudging (Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 2017). Voprosy ekonomiki=Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 1, pp. 5–25. (in Russian)
  • Sunstein C. Nudges.gov: Behavioral Economics and Regulation. In: Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law. Ed. by E. Zamir, D. Teichman. Oxford University Press, 2013. Available at: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2220022 (accessed: 13.12.2019).
  • Divnenko Z.A., Ryzhkova Yu.A., Shuvainikova E.M. Accumulation of the savings in Russia: Problems and Prospects. In: Ekonomika Rossii: perspektivy postkrizisnogo razvitiya: materialy vserossiiskogo nauchnoprakticheskogo simpoziuma molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov [Russia’s economy: Prospects of post-crisis development: Proceedings of the all-Russian research-to-practice symposium of young scientists and specialists]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo IMTs «NVSh – Spb», 2010. Pp. 113–115. (in Russian)
  • Danilova T.N. The institutional aspect of the saving decisions of the population. Finansy i kredit=Finance and Credit, 2006, no. 12, pp. 14–23. (in Russian)
Еще
Статья научная