Non-formal institutional environment of social entrepreneurship

Автор: Popov Evgenii V., Veretennikova Anna Yu., Naumov Ilya V., Kozinskaya Kseniya M.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social development

Статья в выпуске: 4 (58) т.11, 2018 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Social entrepreneurship as an alternative way to solve social problems is rapidly becoming popular. The efficiency of this type of activity largely depends on the formal institutions operating in the territory under consideration, as well as on the prevailing values, habits, customs peculiar to social groups which do not live on it and form an informal institutional environment. The purpose of the study is to simulate the impact of informal institutional environment on social entrepreneurship in the global space. The article analyzes the approaches to analysis of informal institutions; it is shown that this problem is raised in works of both foreign and domestic researchers. The Inglehart-Welzel concept of modernization, cultural change and democracy was used in analysis of informal institutional environment. The information framework of the research consists of international reports of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, the World Values Survey, the World Bank for 2015 in 30 countries...

Еще

Informal institutional environment, social entrepreneurship, factors, inglehart-welzel concept, values

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224075

IDR: 147224075   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.14

Список литературы Non-formal institutional environment of social entrepreneurship

  • Austin J., Stevenson H., WeiSkillern J. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different or both? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2006, no. 30 (1), pp. 1-22 DOI: 10.5700/rausp1055
  • Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Kozinskaya K.M. Social entrepreneurship as an object of institutional analysis. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. «Ekonomika»=Perm University Herald.Economy, 2017, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 360-374. DOI: 10.17072/1994996020173360374
  • Dacin M.T., Goodstein J., Scott W.R. Institutional theory and institutional changes. The academy of management journal, 2002, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 45-57 DOI: 10.2307/3069284
  • Stephan U., Uhlaner L., Stride C. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: the role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of international business studies, 2015, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 308-331 DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2014.38
  • Zahra S., Gedajlovic E., Neubaum D., Shulman J. A typology of social entrepreneurs: motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of business venturing, 2009, no. 24, pp. 519-532 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
  • Schwartz S.H. A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 2006, no. 5 (2-3), pp. 137-182.
  • Estrin S., Mickiewicz T., Stephan U. Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2013, no. 37 (3), pp. 479-504 DOI: 10.1111/etap.12019
  • Dees J., Emerson J., Economy P. Enterprising nonprofits: a toolkit for social entrepreneurs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 2006, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 36-44.
  • Dees J., Anderson B. Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought. Available at: https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp
  • Hoogendoorn Br. What do we know about social entrepreneurship: an analysis of empirical research? Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2009.
  • Kadol N.F. Cotsial’noe predprinimatel’stvo v rynochnoi ekonomike . Bryansk: Del’ta, 2009. 148 p.
  • Arai Yu.N., Burmistrova T.A. Specificity of business models in social entrepreneurship. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta=Russian management journal, 2014, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 55-78..
  • Moskovskaya A.A. (Ed.). Sotsial’noe predprinimatel’stvo v Rossii i v mire: praktika i issledovaniya . Moscow: VShE, 2011. Available at: http://parksgt.tsu.ru/upload/iblock/e78/e7831f3299fc0bdb41b45d08adc41e2b.pdf
  • Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Kozinskaya K.M. Evolution of social entrepreneurship in the world dimensions. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie=Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 2017, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 379-402. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2017.16.3.019
  • Gras D., Moss T., Lumpkin G. The use of secondary data in social entrepreneurship research: assessing the field and identifying future opportunities. In: Short J. (Ed.). Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods (Research Methodology in Strategy and Management). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014. Vol. 9, pp. 49-75.
  • Kerlin J.A. Pollak T. Nonprofit commercial revenue. A replacement for declining government grants and rivate contributions? The American review of public administration, 2011, no. 41 (6), pp. 686-704.
  • Carroll D.A, Stater K.J. Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: does it lead to financial stability? Journal of public administration research and theory, 2008, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 947-966.
  • Veblen T. Teoriya prazdnogo klassa . Moscow: Progress, 1984. P. 204.
  • North D.C. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki . Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi «Nachala», 1997. 180 p.
  • Scott W. R. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.
  • Williamson C.R. Contracting institutions. Mississippi State University. December 18, 2012, p. 4. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm">abstract_id=219129S
  • Pejovich S. The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of markets & morality, 1999, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 164-181.
  • Tambovtsev V.L. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya neformal’nykh institutov . Moscow: RGPress, 2014. 174 p.
  • Schwartz S.H. A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 2006, no. 5 (2-3), pp. 137-182.
  • Auzan A.A., Nikishina E.N. Economic dynamics in the long run: the role of informal institutions. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii=Russian journal of economic theory, 2013, no. 4, pp. 48-57..
  • Polishchuk L., Menyashev R. Economic significance of social capital. Voprosy ekonomiki=Economic issues, 2011, no. 12, pp. 46-65..
  • Hofstede G. Culture consequences. 2nd edition. Sage Publications, 2001.
  • Puumalainen K., Sjögrén H., Syrjä P., Barraket J. Comparing social entrepreneurship across nations: An exploratory study of institutional effects. Canadian journal of administrative science, 2015, no. 32, pp. 276-287 DOI: 10.1002/cjas.1356
  • Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology,1992, vol. 25, pp. 1-65.
  • Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Tsennosti kul’tury i razvitie obshchestva Moscow: GU VShE, 2007. P. 81.
  • Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernizatsiya, kul’turnye izmeneniya i demokratiya. Posledovatel’nost’ chelovecheskogo razvitiya . Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2011.
  • Dees J. G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Draft report for the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1998.
  • Alvord S., Brown L., Letts C. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. Journal of applied behavioral science, 2004, no. 40 (3), pp. 260-282.
  • Sara C., Minard L. Valuing entrepreneurship in the informal economy in Senegal. Social enterprise journal, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 186-209.
  • Peng M., Wang D., Jiang Y. An institutionbased view of international business stragedy: a focus one merging economies. Journal of international business studies, 2008, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 920-936.
  • Nicolas C., Rubio A. Social enterprise: gender gap and economic development. European journal of management and business economics, 2016, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 56-62 DOI: 10.1016/j.redeen.2015.11.001
  • Schwartz Sh. Cultural value orientations: nature & implications of national differences. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki=Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2008, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 39..
  • Zahra S., Rawhouser H., Bhawe N., Neubaum D., Hayton J. Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 2008, no. 2, pp. 117-131 DOI: 10.1002/sej.43
  • Lepoutre J., Justo R., Terjesen S., Bosma N. Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the global entrepreneurship monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small business economics, 2013, no. 40 (3), pp. 693-714 DOI: 10.1007/s1118701193984
Еще
Статья научная