Network diplomacy: approaches to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The aim of the article is to to analyze the concept of modern network diplomacy as well as to illustrate possible solution approaches to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the abovementioned mechanism. Network diplomacy is defined as the multi-level communication, representation, and negotiation of an idea or a set thereof through a set of actors, which may extend beyond traditional, rigid state sponsored institutions and encompass other actors integrated with the idea or parties involved. Methods and materials. The research involved a combination of analytical empirical research containing justification for case selection and qualitative research. The author mostly approaches the topic through liberal paradigm of international relations, accentuating mutual benefits of international cooperation, arguing that flexible formats of diplomacy can be an effective way to help states to interact with each other in an honest manner and support nonviolent solutions to conflicts. Analysis. The analysis is based mainly on case study research, which helped to generate the results. The article will be structured in several parts. The introduction will render an overview of the network diplomacy concept followed by a historic background of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its ideological underpinnings, and so inform a set of theories as pertaining to the potency of network diplomacy in the solution process, which will be outlined in the parts following it. These theories will then be evaluated in the context of the overall environment and specific cases- NGOs as a reach out function in water management at the municipal level, academic institutions establishing communication channels independent of the larger political environment, and a short summary of European Union outreach to non-state actors as an illustrative case of state to non-state actor diplomacy. Moreover, the article includes the study of citizen diplomacy, civil society-based approaches, economically driven incentives and other cultural initiatives such as sports-based diplomacy as possible mechanisms. Results. Network diplomacy may feature a multi-pronged approach to diplomacyrepresented through a mixture of, for example, state actors and non- governmental organizations (NGOs). Network diplomacy is particularly potent in spreading ideas as it allows engagement of a multitude of actors directly, and is subject to comparatively low transaction costs. Network diplomacyappears to be a promising approach to the solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which is characterized by juxtaposing ideological underpinnings in addition to issues of realpolitik, and a multitude of actors including non-state actors.

Еще

Network diplomacy, israeli-palestinian conflict, ngos, citizen diplomacy, sports diplomacy, academic diplomacy, conflict resolution

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149131794

IDR: 149131794   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2021.1.13

Список литературы Network diplomacy: approaches to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

  • Brooks D.B., Trottier J. De-Nationalization and De-Securitization of Transboundary Water Resources: The Israeli-Palestinian Case. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2014, no. 30 (2), pp. 211-223.
  • Cleveland W.L., Bunton M. A History of the Modern Middle East. Westview Press, 2016. 602 p.
  • Cohen H. Joint Israeli-Palestinian Political Activity in Jerusalem: Characteristics and Challenges. Locating Urban Conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan UK, Basingstoke, Hampshire, 2013. 269 p.
  • Coskun B.B. Cooperation over Water Resources as a Tool for Desecuritisation: The Israeli-Palestinian Environmental NGOs as Desecuritising Actor. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 2016, no. 2 (2), pp. 97-115.
  • Golay F., Ziegler S., Harari N., Métaireau B., Carneiro C., Schuler M. Academic Cooperation to Foster Research and Advocacy Competences in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (West Bank). Technologies for Sustainable Development, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014. 303 p.
  • Ide T., Frölich C. Water Conflict or Water Cooperation? A Discursive Understanding of Water Conflict and Cooperation in Israel and Palestine. Norwich Conference on Earth System Governance, New Zealand, 2014, pp. 25-33.
  • Malul M., Bar-El R., Schwartz D. Patterns of Cooperation in High-Tech - Constraints, Feasibility, and Benefits: Results of a Study Among Palestinians and Israelis. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2010, no. 27 (1), pp. 75-92.
  • Martins B. O. The EU Against the New Normal: Avoiding the Banalization of the IsraeliPalestinian Dispute. Mediterranean Politics, 2016, no. 21 (3), pp. 1-5.
  • McConnell F., Megoran N., Williams Ph. Geographies of Peace. New Approaches to Boundaries, Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution. London, I.B. Tauris, 2014. 320 p.
  • Metzl J.F. Network Diplomacy. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 2001, no. 2, p. 77.
  • Miller B. 1: One State or Two: Why a Two-State Solution Is Desirable, Necessary, and Feasible. Ethnopolitics, 2016, no. 15 (4), pp. 438-452.
  • Seidel T., AbuNimer M. Peace and Reconciliation Processes. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. 2520 p.
  • Springer J.E. Assessing Donor-Driven Reforms in the Palestinian Authority: Building the State or Sustaining Status Quo? Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 2015, no. 10 (2), pp. 1-19.
  • Voltolini B. The Role of Non-State Actors in EU Policies Towards the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Paris, France, European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2012. 47 p.
Еще
Статья научная