“Intellectual feebleness” of the ruling elites and the “deep people” of the “long state”

Автор: Ilyin Vladimir A., Morev Mikhail V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Editorial

Статья в выпуске: 2 (62) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In 2018, Russian society faced a contradiction, caused by the discrepancy between the official political rhetoric and the real actions of the Government. Instead of the priorities stated in the President's Address to the Federal Assembly and in the “May decree” (reducing poverty twofold, Russia's joining the top five economies of the world, etc.), the society was faced with the need to take a “bitter medicine” in the form of raising the retirement age. Moreover, the news about the changes in pension legislation reached the general public just after the inauguration of the President (the inauguration took place on May 7, 2018, and the draft law on the pension reform was submitted to the State Duma on June 16). The initial reaction to the pension reform was adamantly negative: according to the surveys conducted by the Public Opinion Foundation, almost 80% of Russians were against the reform. Over the following months, a wave of protests swept across the country and stopped only after Vladimir Putin made an official appeal to the Russian people on August 29 and explained that the pension system has to be reformed; he proposed some adjustments that would soften some conditions of the reform for certain population groups. However, despite the fact that the visible signs of public discontent (protests, critical articles, etc.) are gradually fading, the level of people's support for the authorities, including the President of the Russian Federation, continued to decline; fundamental changes began to take place in the public consciousness, and such changes are of a long-term nature. This fact proves that the pension reform only triggered a more profound internal discontent that has been accumulating over the last years. Thus, at the beginning of 2019, the fundamental question concerning the legitimacy of power in Russia became one of the most pressing and urgent for society and authorities with regard to actual implementation of the tasks set out in the “May Decree”, qualitative growth of the standard of living and, by and large, preservation of the Russian statehood. A deep and ideologically saturated article of V. Putin's personal adviser V. Surkov, which was published in February 2019, addresses this very issue (as some experts think), and it has caused a wide resonance in the academic, political and social environment. The following materials present our views on Surkov's article and on a significant set of issues raised in it. The conclusions we come to are supported not only by the results of our own studies of the long-term dynamics of public opinion, but also by expert assessments, which largely reflect the real situation in the country.

Еще

"long state", "deep people", public opinion, public administration efficiency, president

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224172

IDR: 147224172   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.1

Список литературы “Intellectual feebleness” of the ruling elites and the “deep people” of the “long state”

  • Glaz'ev S.Yu., Lokosov V.V. Assessment of critical threshold values of indicators of the state of Russian society and their use in the management of socio-economic development. Vestnik RAN=Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 587-614..
  • Lokosov V.V. The method of critical threshold indicators and the evaluation of human potential. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo=Economics. Taxes. Law, 2012, no. 5, pp. 71-75..
  • Sulakshin S.S. Rossiyu zhdet revolyutsiya? Voprosy perekhoda k postliberal'noi modeli Rossii (algoritm i stsenarii) . Moscow: Nauka i politika, 2016. 712 p.
  • Osipov G.V. We should not miss the chance we have been given! In: Sotsiologiya i ekonomika sovremennoi sotsial'noi real'nosti. Sotsial'naya i sotsial'no-politicheskaya situatsiya v Rossii v 2013 godu . Moscow: ISPI RAN, 2013. Pp. 6-18..
  • Petukhov V.V. Dynamics of social sentiment of Russians and the formation of request for changes. Sotsis=Sociological Studies, 2018, no. 11, pp. 40-53..
  • Rossiiskoe obshchestvo posle prezidentskikh vyborov -2018: zapros na peremeny: informatsionno-analiticheskoe rezyume . FNISTs RAN. Moscow, 2018. 55 p.
  • Belanovskii S.A., Dmitriev M.E., Nikol'skaya A.V. Signs of fundamental shifts in the mass consciousness of Russians. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'=Social Sciences And Contemporary World, 2019, no. 1, pp. 5 -18..
  • Rossiiskoe obshchestvo v kontekste novykh realii: informatsionno-analiticheskoe rezyume . IS RAN, 2015. 58 p.
  • Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation (approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation from December 1, 2016 No. 642). Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71451998/.
  • Betelin V.V. Russia needs to abandon the "economy of services" and shift to the economy of industrial production. Ekonomist=Economist, 2019, no. 2, pp. 3-12..
  • Lokosov V.V. The method of critical threshold indicators and the evaluation of human potential. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo=Economics. Taxes. Law, 2012, no. 5, pp. 71-75..
  • Gubanov S.S. Pension aggravation: what it means and what it will lead to. Ekonomist=Economist, 2018, no. 9, pp. 10-24..
  • Toshchenko Zh.T. Fantomy rossiiskogo obshchestva . Moscow: Tsentr sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga, 2015. Part 1. 668 p.
  • Toshchenko Zh.T. New faces of activity: imitation. Sotsis=Sociological Studies, 2012, no. 12, pp. 23-36..
  • Dobren'kov V.I., Ispravnikova N.R. Rossiiskaya versiya «kapitalizma dlya svoikh»: est' li vykhod iz tupika? The Russian version of the "capitalism for the few": is there a way out of the impasse? Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya= Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18: Sociology and Political Science, 2013, no. 3, pp. 26-55..
  • Lapin N.I. The formation of the welfare state -a successful method of social evolution. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 2018, no. 8, pp. 3-11..
  • Bobkov V.N. Pension reform: simplicity of tactical decisions is fraught with strategic failure. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal=Russian Economic Journal, 2019, no. 1, pp. 31-40..
  • Korotaev S.A., Shkaratan O.I. Post-soviet statehood and society: the evolution of social contract and legitimizing of authority. Part 3. The strengthening of statehood and social contract between society and authorities. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'= Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2018, no. 1, pp. 59-74..
  • Polterovich V.M. Reformers of science lack the necessary qualifications to cope with the task. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2015, no. 3, pp. 28-31..
  • Abalkin L.I. The way toward success lies through consistency and cooperation. Natsional'nye proekty=National Projects, 2007, no. 8 (15), pp. 12-13..
  • Berdyaev N.A. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma . Paris, 1955. 160 p.
  • Sulakshin S.S. The quality and success of public policies and management. In: Seriya "Politicheskaya aksiologiya" . Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert, 2012. 496 p..
Еще
Статья научная