Forming the strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of rural entrepreneurial organizations in Russia

Forming the strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of rural entrepreneurial organizations in Russia

Автор: Polbitsyn Sergei N.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Regional economy

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.14, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Political, economic and social events of recent years, taking place in all of the countries, when economic institutions and systems are destroyed in a short time under the influence of negative external factors, indicate the need to create resilient socio-economic territorial systems. This problem is essential to rural areas that are most vulnerable to negative external impacts, which confirms the relevance of finding ways and directions to ensure their sustainable development. Our previous research has shown that the formation of an entrepreneurial ecosystem of rural areas, substantiating the institutions of their development, can ensure sustainability of socio-economic development of rural areas and increase their resilience. The article proposes a model for building strategies for the development of entrepreneurial organizations within the entrepreneurial ecosystem, aimed at ensuring sustainable socio-economic development of rural areas and increasing the competitive environment of the ecosystem. The purpose of the article is to develop a factor model for building entrepreneurial strategies of entrepreneurial organizations that adequately meet the role of the rural entrepreneurial ecosystem in the current conditions of development of Russian rural areas. The strategic development concept is usually applied in the analysis of large corporate organizations. It is believed that small businesses, exposed to external factors, must use adaptive tactics and cannot formulate and implement a strategy for their development. Based on the analysis of scientific literature and the results of a survey of entrepreneurs on the example of the Sverdlovsk Oblast of the Russian Federation, we found that rural entrepreneurs seek to determine strategic directions of their development. The article presents approaches to the disclosure of relevant factors that determine the model for choosing a development strategy for rural entrepreneurial organizations. The information base of the study includes research works of Russian and foreign scientists on the topic under consideration, as well as the results of a thematic survey. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that for the first time an attempt has been made to build a factor model for strategic development of rural entrepreneurs within the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystem of rural areas.

Еще

Rural entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial ecosystem, entrepreneurial organizations, strategy, factor model, rural areas, ecosystem resilience

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147236294

IDR: 147236294   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.6.78.7

Список литературы Forming the strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of rural entrepreneurial organizations in Russia

  • Polbitsyn S.N. Russia’s rural entrepreneurial ecosystems. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2019, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 298–308. DOI: 10.17059/2019-1-23 (in Russian).
  • Malecki E.J. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 2018, no. 12, p. 21. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12359
  • Solodilova N.Z., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Regional entrepreneurship system: Development parameters and potential of reconfiguration. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2017, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 1107–1122. DOI: 10.17059/2017-4-11 (in Russian).
  • Toropov D.I., Kichigina I.S. Small business: Rural dimension. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie=AIC: Economics, Management, 2010, no. 2, pp. 39–42 (in Russian).
  • Anthopoulou T., Kaberis N., Petrou M. Aspects and experiences of crisis in rural Greece. Narratives of rural resilience. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, no. 52, рр. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.006
  • Acs Z. J., Estrin S., Mickiewicz T., Szerb L. Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 2018, no. 51, рр. 501–514. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9
  • Stam E., van de Ven A. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 2021, no. 56, рр. 809–832. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
  • Polbitsyn S.N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody k formirovaniyu agroinnovatsionnoi sistemy [Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Formation of the Agro-Innovation System]. Ur. gos. agrar. un-t, Yekaterinburg, 2015.
  • Stam E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 2015, 23, рр. 1759–1769. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
  • Acs Z. J., Stam E., Audretsch D.B., O’connor A. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 2017, 49, рр. 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
  • Porter M.E. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 1979, no. 57, pp. 137–145.
  • Polbitsyn S.N. Identifying hurdles for innovators: The case of Russian rural areas. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, Prague, May 31 – June 1, 2018. Pp. 924–932.
  • Anderson A.R., Jack S.L. The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or a lubricant? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2002, no. 14, рр. 193–210. DOI: 10.1080/08985620110112079
  • Klyuev A.K., Yashin A.A. Business education programs in a modern university. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii=Higher Education in Russia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 22–33 (in Russian).
  • Martin B.C., Mcnally J.J., Kay M.J. Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, no. 28, pp. 211–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002
  • Voroshilov N.V. Assessing the socio-economic potential of rural territories. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 91–109. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.7 (in Russian).
  • Chen C., Woods M., Chen J., Liu Y., Gao J. Globalization, state intervention, local action and rural locality reconstitution – a case study from rural China. Habitat International, 2019, no. 93, 102052. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102052
  • Attneave F.A. Method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychological Review, 1949, no. 56, pp. 334–340. DOI: 10.1037/h0063110
  • Il’inykh S.A. Entrepreneurship in Russia: Analysis of the factors of influence. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki=Problems of Modern Economics, 2015, no. 2(54), pp. 153–156 (in Russian).
  • Gineite M., Vilcina A. Interaction of local governments and entrepreneurship. In: Economic Science for Rural Development: Sustainability. 2011. Рр. 61–66.
  • Spigel B., Harrison R. Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, no. 12, pp. 151–168. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1268
  • Sovetova N.P. Rural territories’ digitalization: From theory to practice. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 105–124. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.2.74.7 (in Russian).
  • Davis A., Olson E.M. Critical competitive strategy issues every entrepreneur should consider before going into business. Business Horizons, 2008, no. 51, pp. 211–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.01.010
  • Borubaeva G.N. The system of factors determining the strategy of sustainable development of entrepreneurial activity in agriculture. Novaya nauka: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti razvitiya=The New Science: Current State and Ways of Development, 2016, no. 8, pp. 204–206 (in Russian).
  • Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 1989, no. 14, рр. 532–550. DOI: 10.2307/258557
  • Mokina L.S. Tendencies of development of the agrarian sector of Sverdlovsk region at the present stage. Ovoshchi Rossii=Ovoŝi Rossii, 2018, no. 4(42), pp. 55–61 (in Russian).
  • Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2010, no. 15, рр. 625–632. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  • Harpe S.E. How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2015, no. 7, pp. 836–850. DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
  • Murray J.A. A concept of entrepreneurial strategy. Strat. Mgmt. J., 1984, no. 5, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050102
  • Polbitsyn S.N. The role of entrepreneurship in the sustainable development of rural areas in Russia. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2021, vol. 17, issue 2, pp. 619–631. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-1 (in Russian).
  • Goschin Z. What makes new firms resilient? A spatial analysis for Romania. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 2020, no. 12, pp. 907–924. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12344
  • Shams R., Kaufmann H.R. Entrepreneurial co-creation: A research vision to be materialised. Management Decision, 2016, no. 54(6), pp. 1250–1268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2015-0487
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©