Figurative framing around pandemic discourse: from metaphorical wars on coronavirus to wars on antivaxxers

Бесплатный доступ

The current paper deals with metaphorical framing of the COVID-19 pandemic and public response to it in the public and media discourse. Being one of the most dramatic global challenges of the third Millennium, the COVID-19 pandemic spurred transformation in social order, economic/business relationships and dramatic growth in social anxiety and tensions, mistrust and discriminatory measures. It has inevitably found its reflection in language and related discursive practices, which rely heavily on discourse metaphors. When being systematically employed, they affect people's views of events, situations and decisions they subsequently make. The present paper focuses primarilyon the COVID-induced discourse changes that create new metaphorical framings and re-shape the familiar ones. The repertoire of elicited discourse metaphors framing the coronavirus discourse communicates the changing combating strategies referred to by the authors as globalist, nationalist and discriminatory. By drawing on specially compiled subcorpus of public and media texts, the paper reveals the conceptual and inferential structure of the concept of the COVID-19 pandemic and discusses the possible implications of activating various pandemic-related frames. The study stresses that the discursive construction of the coronavirus pandemic mirrors the dynamic nature of the pandemic itself as well as the measures to combat the insidious virus taken bynational governments, the spread of misinformation and fake news as well as the split in the society and discrimination of certain groups (vaccine deniers/anti-vaxxers). Acknowledging the prevalence of military metaphors in the pandemic-related discourse, the authors claim that metaphorical framing serves as a crucial conceptual tool to communicate the gradual transition from war on COVID-19 to war of vaccines and ultimately to war on out-groups (vaccine deniers, anti-vaxxers).


Metaphor, metaphorical framing, public discourse, media discourse, globalist strategy, nationalist strategy, discriminatory strategy

Короткий адрес:

IDR: 149140052

Список литературы Figurative framing around pandemic discourse: from metaphorical wars on coronavirus to wars on antivaxxers

  • Allport G.W., 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, Mass., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 537 p.
  • Blank J.M., Shaw D., 2015. Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes Toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 658, iss. 1. DOI: 10.1177/ 0002716214554756.
  • Bhutto F., 2021. The World's Richest Countries are Hoarding Vaccines. This is Morally Indefensible. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian. com/commentisfree/2021/mar/17/rich-countries-hoarding-vaccines-us-eu-africa (accessed 20 October 2021).
  • Calvillo D.P., Ross B.J., Garcia R.J., Smelter T.J., Rutchick A.M., 2020. Political Ideology Predicts Perceptions of the Threat of COVID-19 (And Susceptibility to Fake News About It). Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 11, iss. 8, pp. 1119-1128. DOI: 10.1177/1948550 620940539.
  • Caless B., Tong S., 2015. Leading Policing in Europe: An Empirical Study of Police Leadership. European Police Science and Research Bulletin, iss. 12, pp. 13-17.
  • Charteris-Black J., 2017. Fire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority. S. l., Bloomsbury. 238 p.
  • Dodge E., Hong J., Stickles E., 2015. MetaNet: Deep Semantic Automatic Metaphor Analysis. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, pp. 40-49. URL: https://
  • Finkel Y., Mizrahi O., Nachshon A. et al., 2021. The Coding Capacity of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 589, pp. 125-130. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2739-1.
  • Flusberg S.J, Matlock T., Thibodeau P.H. 2018. War Metaphors in Public Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 33, iss. 1, pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/ 10926488.2018.1407992.
  • Gibbs R., 2012. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 337 p.
  • Henderson K., 2020. Trump is Not a Wartime President -and COVID-19 is Not a War. Counterpunch. URL: trump-is-not-a-wartime-president-and-covid-19-is-not-a-war (accessed 20 November 2021).
  • Huang J., 2020. Chinese Diplomat Accuses US of Spreading Coronavirus. URL: https:// (accessed 22 October 2021).
  • Kalinin O.I., Romanov A.S., 2021. Comparative Analysis of the Coronavirus Metaphorical Projections in the Chinese and Russian Mass Media. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal 'nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences], vol. 14, iss. 10, pp. 1499-1508. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0834.
  • Kovecses Z., 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 224 p.
  • Kovecses Z., 2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 196 p.
  • Larson H.J., Broniatowski D.A., 2021. Volatility of Vaccine Confidence. Science, vol. 371, iss. 6536, p. 1289. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi6488.
  • Lakoff G., Johnson M., 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 256 p.
  • Myers S.L., 2020. China Spins Tale that the U.S. Army Started the Coronavirus Epidemic. URL: https:// coronavirus-china-conspiracy-theory.html (accessed 15 November 2021).
  • Nerlich B., 2020. Metaphors in the Time of Coronavirus. URL: https://blogs.nottingham. metaphor s-in-the-time-of-coronavirus (accessed 15 November 2021).
  • Semino E., 2017. Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor. Dancygier B., ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 463-476.
  • Semino E., 2021. "Not Soldiers but Fire-Fighters" -Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, vol. 36, iss. 1, pp. 50-58. DOI: 10.1080/10410236. 2020.1844989.
  • Shmeleva E., 2021. Russkiy kovidnyy: novye yazykovye yavleniya global'noy pandemii [COVID-Russian: New Linguistic Features from a Global Pandemic]. Russian Language Journal, vol. 71, iss. 2, pp. 319331. URL: vol71/iss2/17.
  • Skrynnikova I.V., 2020. Analogical Reasoning in Uncovering the Meaning of Digital-Technology Terms: The Case of Backdoor. Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research, vol. 4, pp. 23-46. DOI: 2020.12921.
  • Sontag S., 1979. Illness As Metaphor. London, Allen Lane. 100 p.
  • Sweetser E., David O., Stickles E., 2019. MetaNet: Automated Metaphor Identification Across Languages and Domains. Bolognesi M., Brdar M., Despot K., eds. Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age: Theory and Methods for Building Repositories of Figurative Language. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 23-47. DOI: 10.1075/milcc.8.02swe.
  • Tamkin E., 2020. Using Military Language to Discuss Coronavirus is Dangerous and Irresponsible -The US Must Stop. New Statesman. URL: https:// using-military-language-discuss-coronavirus-dangerous-and-irresponsible (accessed 15 October 2021).
  • Wicke P., Bolognesi M., 2020. Framing COVID-19: How We Conceptualize and Discuss the Pandemic on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 15 (9). DOI: https:// (accessed 10 October 2021).
  • Woolhandler S. et al., 2021. Public Policy and Health in the Trump Era. The Lancet Commissions, vol. 397, iss. 10275, pp. 705-753. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)32545-9.
  • Zaitseva I.P., 2020. "Koronapsikhoz", "koronaskeptiki", "covidism", "covidophobia" i drugie sotsiolingvisticheskie markery 2020 g. ["Corona Psychosis", "Corona Skeptics", "Covidism", "Covidophobia" and Other Sociolinguistic Markers of 2020]. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya [Communication Studies], vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 801-813. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2020.7(4).801-813.
  • Zhou Y.R., 2021. Vaccine Nationalism: Contested Relationships Between COVID-19 and Globalization. Globalizations. DOI: https:// (accessed 20 October 2021).
Статья научная