Development of social innovations in Russia in terms of activities and interaction of government bodies, business structures, and civil society

Автор: Mierau Julia N., Soloveva Tatiana S., Popov Andrei V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Innovation development

Статья в выпуске: 5 т.13, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Due to the growing global socio-economic and environmental challenges (population ageing, climate change, society polarization, etc.), there is a revaluation of a position and role of innovations in overcoming threats to social development in the modern world. Researchers note a shift in the innovation paradigm toward social innovation, since it is assumed that it is not possible to achieve a drastic improvement of the situation solely through technological innovations. At the same time, many existing problems cannot be solved with efforts of a single actor - intersectoral cooperation becomes a necessity. This aspect is of key importance for development of social innovation. The purpose of the study was to analyze development of social innovations in the Russian Federation based on an actor approach, which involves an overview of this phenomenon through the prism of activities of various entities and their interaction. General scientific methods were used in the study: discourse analysis, generalization, comparison, etc. Essential foundations and the role of social innovations in solving current society’s problems are presented. Using the example of government structures, big business, and civil society, the authors explore the features of social innovation development in Russia. It is shown that development of social innovations depends on their interpretation in public discourse, involvement in strategies of various actors, and intersectoral cooperation in the innovation process. In conclusion, the prospects for development of studied phenomenon are determined within identified trends and the specifics of interconnections between designated actors. The results obtained may be used not only as an empirical basis for further research, but they may also represent practical significance in development of specific management decisions in this area.

Еще

Social innovations, intersectoral interaction, civil society, social entrepreneurship, social policy

Короткий адрес: https://readera.org/147225486

IDR: 147225486   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.9

Список литературы Development of social innovations in Russia in terms of activities and interaction of government bodies, business structures, and civil society

  • Moulaert F., Mehmood A., MacCallum D., Leubolt B. (eds.) Social Innovation as a Trigger for Transformations – The Role of Research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. 108 p.
  • Domanski D., Howaldt J., Kaletka C. A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies, 2020, vol. 28 (3), pp. 454–474. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397
  • Baglioni S., Sinclair S. Social Innovation and Social Policy: Theory, Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press, 2018. 136 p.
  • Pel B., Bauler T. The Institutionalization of social innovation between transformation and capture. TRANSIT Working Paper, 2014, no. 2. Available at: http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/content/original/Book%20covers/Local%20PDFs/179%20TRANSIT_WorkingPaper2_Governance_Pel141015.pdf
  • Fougère M., Meriläinen E. Exposing three dark sides of social innovation through critical perspectives on resilience. Industry and Innovation, 2019. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13662716.2019.1709420. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1709420
  • Ilyin V.A., Morev M.V. “Russian Federation – a welfare state?”: Assessing the results of 25 years of implementation of Article 7 of the Russian Constitution. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 9–25. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.6.60.1 (in Russian).
  • Tarasenko A.V. Diversifikatsiya sfery sotsial’nykh uslug v Rossii: faktory regional’nykh razlichii [Diversification of the Social Services Sector in Russia: Factors of Regional Differences]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2017. 28 p.
  • Soboleva I.V., Chubarova T.V. Sotsial’naya politika v Rossii – kontury novoi modeli [Social Policy in Modern Russia – Contours of a New Model]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2017. 45 p.
  • Okhotskii E.V., Bogucharskaya V.A. The social state and social policy of modern Russia: Orientation to the result. Trud i sotsial’nye otnosheniya=Labour and Social Relations, 2012, no. 5 (95), pp. 30–44 (in Russian).
  • Ogburn W.F., Nimkoff M.F. Sociology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co, 1940. 953 р.
  • Millard J. How social innovation underpins sustainable development. In: J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schröder (eds.). Atlas of Social Innovation. Dortmund: Sozialforschungsstelle, 2018. Pр. 40–43.
  • Bogdan N.I. Socialization of innovation policy: World trends and challenges for Belarus. Belorusskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal=Belarusian Economic Journal, 2015, no. 3, pp. 4–22 (in Russian).
  • Howaldt J., Schwarz M. Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends. Dortmund: TU-Dortmund, 2010. 83 р.
  • Heiskala R. Social innovations: Structural and power perspectives. In: T.J. Hämäläinen, R. Heiskala (eds.). Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Making Sense of Structural Adjustment Processes in Industrial Sectors, Regions and Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007. Pp. 52–79.
  • Rüede D., Lurtz K. Mapping the Various Meanings of Social Innovation: Towards a Differentiated Understanding of an Emerging Concept. Oestrich-Winkel: EBS Business School, 2012. 51 p.
  • Jenson J. Social innovation: Redesigning the welfare diamond. In: A. Nicholls, J. Simon, M. Gabriel, C. Whelan (eds.). New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, 2015. Pp. 89–106.
  • Mulgan G. Social innovation theories: Can theory catch up with practice? In: H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, J. Howaldt (eds.). Challenge Social Innovation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012. Pp. 19–42.
  • Lapin N.I., Prigozhin A.I., Sazonov B.V., Tolstoi V.S. Innovations in organizations (the general part of the research program). In: Struktura innovatsionnogo protsessa [The Structure of the Innovation Process]. Moscow, 1981. Pp. 5–21.
  • Popov A.V., Soloveva T.S. Social innovation in Russian scientific discourse. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2018, vol. 3 (2), pp. 14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.18-2.2
  • Austin J., Stevenson H., Wei-Skillern J. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006, vol. 30(1), pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
  • Popov A.V., Solov’eva T.S. The development potential of social innovations in Russia and the EU. Sovremennaya Evropa=Contemporary Europe, 2020, no. 1, pp. 170–181. DOI 10.15211/soveurope12020170181 (in Russian).
  • Soloveva T.S., Popov A.V. Assessment of intersectoral coordination in the development of social innovation at the regional level. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo=Social Area, 2019, no. 4 (21). Available at: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/28314. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.4.21.2
  • Krasnopolskaya I.I., Mersiyanova I.V. Civil society as an environment for production and diffusion of social innovation. Forsait=Foresight and STI Governance, 2014, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 40–53 (in Russian).
  • Cook L. Postcommunist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. London: Cornell UniversityPress, 2007. 288 p.
  • Danilova E.N. Transformations in the welfare regime and discourse on social justice in Russia. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 36–61. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-2-36-61 (in Russian).
  • Neshachadin A.A., Kashin V.K., Tulchinskij G.L. About forms of social entrepreneurship. Obshchestvo i ekonomika=Society and Economy, 2014, no. 9, pp. 143–161 (in Russian).
  • Sotsial’nyi predprinimatel’-2018. Avtoportret: kratkii analiticheskii otchet po rezul’tatam issledovaniya [Social Entrepreneur–2018. Self-portrait: A short analytical report on the research results]. Moscow: TsIRKON, 2018. 37 p.
  • Nefedova A.I. Social entrepreneurship in Russia: Key players and development potentiality. WP BRP, 2015, vol. 51/STI/2015. 27 р. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32653.44009
  • Evans A.B., Henry L.A., Sundstrom L.M. (eds.) Russian Civil Society: A Critical Assessment. New York: Routledge. 2005. 348 p.
  • Yakobson L.I., Mersiyanova I.V., Kononykhina O.N. et al. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v moderniziruyushcheisya Rossii: analiticheskii doklad Tsentra issledovanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva i nekommercheskogo sektora Natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo universiteta «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» po itogam realizatsii proekta «Indeks grazhdanskogo obshchestva – CIVICUS» [Civil society in modernizing Russia: Analytical report of the Centre for Studies of Civil Society and the Nonprofit Sector National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) following the results of the project “Civil Society Index - CIVICUS”]. Moscow: NIU VShE, 2011. 60 p.
  • Chebankova E. The Evolution of Russia’s civil society under Vladimir Putin: A cause for concern or ground for optimism? Perspectives of European Politics and Society, 2009, vol. 10 (3), pp. 394–415. DOI: 10.1080/15705850903105819
  • Rozhdestvenskaya N.V., Boguslavskaya S.B., Bobrova O.S. Otsenka effektivnosti proektov nekommercheskikh organizatsii, sotsial’nogo predprinimatel’stva i grazhdanskikh initsiativ [Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Projects of Non-Profit Organizations, Social Entrepreneurship and Civil Initiatives]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2016. 168 p.
  • Aasland A., Mikkel B.-N., Bogdanova E. Encouraged but controlled: Governance networks in Russian regions. East European Politics, 2016, vol. 32 (2), рр. 148–169. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2016.1167042
  • Kropp S. Preface. In: S. Kropp, A. Aasland, B.-N. Mikkel, H.-H. Jørn, J. Schuhmann (eds.). Governance in Russian Regions. A Policy Comparison. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Pр. 73–104. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61702-2
  • Tarasenko A. Russian welfare reform and social NGOs: Strategies for claim-making and service provision in the case of Saint Petersburg. East European Politics, 2015, vol. 31 (3), рр. 294–313. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1023895
  • Tullock G. Rent Seeking. Cambridge: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cambridge University Press, 1993. 98 p.
  • Sobolev A., Zakharov A. Civic and Political Activism in Russia. In: D. Treisman (ed.). The New Autocracy: Information, Politics, and Policy in Putin’s Russia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2018. Pp. 249–276.
Еще
Статья научная