Development of growth poles in the Russian Federation: direct and reverse effects

Development of growth poles in the Russian Federation: direct and reverse effects

Автор: Suvorova Arina V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Spatial aspects of territorial development

Статья в выпуске: 6 (66) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The understanding of economic polarization as one of the possible sources of economic development is rooted in a number of scientific papers and in strategic planning documents. This understanding requires the revision of the implications that emerge due to the formation and development of growth poles. The goal of our present research is to develop an approach that will help assess the impact of growth poles on the surrounding space. Scientific novelty of the work consists in the justification of an approach to the identification of direct and reverse effects of the development of growth poles, which allows us to measure the scale of the impact they have on the territories concentrated around. Theoretical and methodological basis of the study is formed by a set of scientific ideas in the field of regional economics, spatial analysis and modeling. Using the assessment of spatial autocorrelation (by determining the values of Moran's Global Index and Moran's Local Index) and the implementation of cartographic analysis, we assess the relationships between individual constituent entities of the Russian Federation according to the resulting parameters of territory development such as “permanent population” and “gross regional product”. According to the calculations we prove that the influence of growth poles on the surrounding space is ambiguous: the territories located near large-scale socio-economic systems do not receive a significant impetus to their own development; moreover, they lose the resources they already have. The revealed pronounced reverse effect of economic polarization determines the importance of applying a balanced approach to the use of growth poles as a tool of economic development. The results of our research can be used in the work of public authorities at different levels and can also form the basis for further studies related to the measurement of the effects of development of growth poles and the development of priorities and mechanisms of regional policy, taking into account the interests of the territories that surround them.

Еще

Growth pole, assessment of the effect, direct effect, opposite effect, spatial autocorrelation, moran's index

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224226

IDR: 147224226   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.6

Список литературы Development of growth poles in the Russian Federation: direct and reverse effects

  • Animitsa E.G., Surnina N.M. Economic space of Russia: problems and prospects. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2006, no. 3, pp. 34-46. (In Russian).
  • Bukhval'd E.M. Unified innovation space as a priority of spatial development of the Russian economy. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk=Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019, no. 4, pp. 9-25. 10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10042. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10042.(InRussian)
  • Tatarkin A.I. Development of economic space of regions of Russia on the basis of cluster principles. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2012, no. 3 (21), pp. 28-36. (In Russian).
  • Zubarevich N.V. Regional development and regional policy in Russia. EKO=ECO, 2014, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 7-27. (In Russian).
  • Myrdal G. Sovremennye problemy "tret'ego mira". Drama Azii [Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations]. Translated from English. Moscow: Progress, 1972. 767 p.
  • Perroux F. Economic space theory and application. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2007, no. 2, pp. 77-93. (In Russian).
  • Boudeville J. Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh, 1966. 192 p.
  • Pottier P. Axes de Communication et Développement Economique. Revue économique, 1963, vol. 14, pp. 58-132.
  • Hagerstrand T. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967. 334 p.
  • Giersch H. Aspects of growth, structural change, and employment a schumpeterian perspective. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 1979, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 629-652.
  • Friedmann J. Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press, 1966. 279 p.
  • Richardson H.W. City Size and National Spatial Strategies in Developing Countries. World Bank Staff Working Paper no. 252. Washington, D.C., 1977.
  • Romer P.M. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1002-1037.
  • Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A.J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999. 367 p.
  • Porter M. On Competition, Updated and Expanded Edition. Harvard Business Review Press, 2008. 576 p.
  • Amber Naz A., Niebuhr A., Peters J. What's behind the disparities in firm innovation rates across regions? Evidence on composition and context effects. The Annals of Regional Science, 2015, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 131-156.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00168-015-0694-9
  • Batabyal A., Nijkamp P. The magnification of a lagging region's initial economic disadvantages on the balanced growth path. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 2019, vol. 3, no 3, pp. 719-730.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s41685-019-00118-7
  • Otsuka A., Goto M. Total factor productivity and the convergence of disparities in Japanese regions. The Annals of Regional Science, 2016, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 419-432.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00168-016-0745-x
  • Shin E. Disparities in access to opportunities across neighborhoods types: a case study from the Los Angeles region. Transportation, 2018. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/#citeas.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11116-018-9862-y
  • Li Z., Ding Ch., Niu Y. Industrial structure and urban agglomeration: evidence from Chinese cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 2019, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 191-218.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00168-019-00932-z
  • Otsuka A. How do population agglomeration and interregional networks improve energy efficiency? Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 2019. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s41685-019-00126-7
  • Rossi F., Dej M. Where do firms relocate? Location optimisation within and between Polish metropolitan areas. The Annals of Regional Science, 2019. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00168-019-00948-5
  • Moroshkina M.V. Spatial development of Russia: regional disproportions. Regionologiya=Regional Studies, 2018, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 638-357. 10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.2.48-66. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.2.48-66.(InRussian)
  • Konyaeva T.V. Study of regional imbalances in the development of the digital economy of the Volga Federal District. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika= Economics and Business: Theory and Practice, 2019, no. 7, pp. 76-80. 10.24411/2411-0450-2019-11080. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.24411/2411-0450-2019-11080.(InRussian)
  • Bufetova A.N. Trends in the concentration of economic activity and disparities in Russia's spatial development. Regional Research of Russia, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120-126.
  • DOI: 10.1134/S2079970517020022
  • Rusanovskii V.A., Brovkova A.V., Markov V.A. Modeling the effect of spatial localization in urban agglomerations of Russia. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy, 2018, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 136-163. 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-136-163. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-136-163.(InRussian)
  • Kolosovskii N.N. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo raionirovaniya [Theory of Economic Zoning]. Moscow, 1969. 336 p.
  • Leonov S.N. Empirical analysis of polarized development of the subject of the Russian Federation. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economy: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 449-458. (In Russian).
  • Ivanov T.N. Modeling potential "growth poles" of the regional economy. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo=Russian entrepreneurship, 2014, no. 9 (255), pp. 82-88. (In Russian).
  • Dronov S.E. Problems of activation of growth points in the regions of Russia. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy=Socio-economic phenomena and processes, 2014, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 37-41. (In Russian).
  • Shaikhutdinova G.F. Formirovanie lichnostnykh, ekonomicheskikh i organizatsionnykh komponentov predprinimatel'stva v koordinatakh innovatsionnoi ekonomiki [Formation of personal, economic and organizational components of entrepreneurship in the coordinates of the innovative economy]. Ufa: Ufimskii gosudarstvennyi universitet ekonomiki i servisa, 2013. 80 p.
  • Mirgorodskaya E.O. Assessment of territorial and economic connectivity of cities in agglomeration (on the example of big Rostov). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya=Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 3: Economics. Ecology, 2017, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 6-20. 10.15688/jvolsu3.2017.4.1. (In Russian)
  • DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu3.2017.4.1.(InRussian)
  • Shmidt A.V., Antonyuk V.S., Franchini A. Urban agglomerations in regional development: theoretical, methodological and applied aspects. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2016, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 776-789. (In Russian).
  • Hubert L.J., Golledge R.G., Costanza C.M. Generalized procedures for evaluating spatial autocorrelation. Geographical Analysis, 1981, no. 13, pp. 224-233.
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1981.tb00731.x
  • Jackson M.C., Huang L., Xie Q. et al. A modified version of Moran's I. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2010, no. 9. Available at: https://ij-healthgeographics.biomedcentral.com/articles/.
  • DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-33
  • Luo Q., Griffith D., Wu H. Spatial autocorrelation for massive spatial data: verification of efficiency and statistical power asymptotics. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2019, no. 21, pp. 237-269.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10109-019-00293-3
  • Waldhor T. The spatial autocorrelation coefficient Moran's I under heteroscedasticity. Statistics in Medicine, 1996, vol. 15, no. 7-9, pp. 887-892. :7/93.0.CO;2-E
  • DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960415)15
  • Balash O.S. Statistical study of spatial clustering of Russian regions. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki=Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 2012, no. 2-1, pp. 56-65. (In Russian).
  • Rusanovskii V.A., Markov V.A. Influence of spatial factor on regional differentiation of unemployment in the Russian economy. Problemy prognozirovaniya=Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2016, no. 5, pp. 144-157. (In Russian).
  • Lv K., Lin Y., Kang J. Spatial econometric analysis on industrial structure and environmental pollution. International Conference on Frontiers of Energy, Environmental Materials and Civil Engineering. DEStech Publications, Inc, 2013. Pp. 76-89.
  • Gallyamova L.I. The Far East in the all-Russian space: historical experience of development and features of development of the region. Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk=Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013, no. 4, pp. 9-17. (In Russian).
  • Govorukhin G.E. Russian Far East: lost expectations of the developed space (sociological approach). Vlast' i upravlenie na vostoke Rossii=Power and Management in the East of Russia, 2008, no. 4 (45), pp. 115-120. (In Russian).
  • Zubarevich N.V. Development of the Russian space: barriers and opportunities of regional policy. Mir novoi ekonomiki=World of the New Economy, 2017, no. 2, pp. 46-57. (In Russian).
  • Zaionchkovskaya Zh.A., Ioffe G.V. Dynamics of settlement in the Moscow region as a reflection of post-Soviet transformations. In: Voprosy geografii. Sb. 135: Geografiya naseleniya i sotsial'naya geografiya [Questions of Geography. Collection. 135: Population Geography and Social Geography]. Moscow: Kodeks, 2013. Pp. 188- 223.
  • Zaionchkovskaya Zh.A., Mkrtchyan N.V. The role of migration in the dynamics of the number and composition of the population of Moscow. In: Immigranty v Moskve [Immigrants in Moscow]. Moscow: Tri kvadrata, 2009. Pp. 18-44. (In Russian).
  • Yakovleva N.V., Ishun'kina E.A. Interregional economic cooperation of the Chelyabinsk Oblast. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economy: Theory and Practice, 2018, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 831-843. 10.24891/re.16.5.831. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.24891/re.16.5.831.(InRussian)
  • Glumov A.A. Research on economic relations of the Sverdlovsk Oblast with the regions of the Urals. Upravlenets=Manager, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 8-13. 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-1-2. (In Russian).
  • DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-1-2.(InRussian)
  • Pozhidaev R.G. Evolution of the concept of proximity and actual cluster policy. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie=Vestnik VSU. Series: Economics and Management, 2019, no. 3, pp. 26-34. (In Russian).
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©