Developing territorial differentiation processes of agricultural production in the Non-Black Earth region and their current trends

Автор: Kostyaev Aleksandr I., Nikonova Galina N.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Environmental economics

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.14, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

In the Russian Non-Black Earth Region, an unacceptable contrast remains between the level of socio-economic development of cities and the presence of “desolation zones” in rural areas. In turn, rural areas of the regions are excessively differentiated and polarized. In some areas, innovative agricultural production is developing, and the number of rural residents is growing, in others, commodity production is declining, depopulation is increasing, and social desertification and space compression are taking place there. Socio-economic phenomena in rural areas depend on the directions and rates of dynamics of agricultural production. Hence, the main idea, presented in the article, is the consideration of differentiation process of agricultural production as the primary basis for the heterogeneity formation of rural areas. The purpose of the study is to identify the level and features of the formation of territorial differentiation of agricultural production in the Non-Black Earth Region during the planned (1974-1990) and market (1991-2019) economies, and to determine ways to reduce its excessive redundancy. At the same time, the authors analyze territorial differentiation from two sides: as a process and as a result of this process. Methodologically, the paper considers the development heterogeneity from the standpoint of the “center - periphery” concept and differential rent theory. The work uses the method of multicriteria stratification of the final rank scales. The ranking is carried out according to the Board rule, the countries are determined on ordinal scales using tertiles, quartiles, and quintiles. The article calculates the coefficients of Gini and funds. As a result, the authors have determined a sharp increase in interregional differentiation and polarization in the production of agricultural goods in 1991-2019. According to the dynamics of agricultural production in 1974-1990, there have been identified five types of regions, the rating positions of which have been transformed in six directions in the subsequent period. In conclusion, the authors have determined the aggregate level of interregional differentiation. The study identifies three groups and nine subgroups of regions, and defines the differences between them. The paper establishes current trends of the differentiation process in the production of agricultural goods, and proposes ways to reduce excessive differentiation and polarization of the regions.

Еще

Heterogeneity, rural areas, region, type, group, area, growth rates, program

Короткий адрес: https://readera.org/147235422

IDR: 147235422   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.4.76.9

Список литературы Developing territorial differentiation processes of agricultural production in the Non-Black Earth region and their current trends

  • Petrikov A.V. Economic growth in Russian agriculture: factors and problems. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii=Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 2018, vol. 214, no. 6, pp. 450–469. (In Russian).
  • Kostyaev A.I. et al. Rural Nechernozemye: From plan to market. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie=Agro-Industrial Complex: Economics, Management, 2021, no. 5, pp. 3–15. DOI: 10.33305/215-3 (In Russian).
  • Nefedova T.G. Development of the Post-Soviet agricultural sector and rural spatial polarization in European Russia. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 36–56. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.4.036-056 (In Russian).
  • Nefedova T.G., Medvedev A.A. Shrinkage of active space in Central Russia: Population dynamics and land use in countryside. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya=Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series Geography, 2020, no. 5, pp. 645–659. DOI: 10.31857/S258755662005012X (In Russian).
  • Averkieva K.V. Innovations in agriculture in the non-black-soil zone of Russia as a response to shrinkage of space. Regional Research of Russia, 2013, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–61. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970513010036
  • Romanova E., Vinogradova O., Frizina I. Social and economic space compression in border areas: The case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 2015, no. 3 (25), pp. 28–46. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3
  • Urasova A.A. , Balandin D.A., Pytkin F.N., Kovaleva E.B., Zagoruiko I.Y. Spatial development of rural territories in Russian regions: Growth areas or desolation zones? International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 4110–4122. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.B3083.078219. Available at: https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i2/B3083078219.pdf
  • Averkieva K.V. Labor markets and the role of otkhodnichestvo in the employment of rural inhabitants of Russians Non-Chernozem zone. Regional Research of Russia, 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21–31. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970516010020
  • Friedmann J. Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. Cambridge, Mass. M.I.T. Press, 1966. 279 р.
  • Gritsai O.V., Ioffe G.A., Treivish A.I. Tsentr i periferiya v regional'nom razvitii [Center and periphery in regional development]. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 161 p.
  • Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii [Priority directions in the development of the agro-industrial complex of Russia]. Moscow: Tekhnologiya TsD, 2018. 416 p.
  • Tretyakovа L.A., Vladyka M.V., Vlasova T.A., Glotov D.S. Differentiation of the regions of the Central Federal district of the Russian Federation according to the level of competitive advantages. Humanities & Social Sciences Review, 2019, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 835–839. DOI: 10.18510/hssr.2019.75108. Available at: https://giapjournals.com/index.php/hssr/article/view/hssr.2019.75108
  • Farinyuk Yu.T., Egorova E.V. Typology of the regions of the Non-Chernozem zone by the level of agricultural development. Ekonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel'skom khozyaistve=Economics, Labor, Management in Agriculture, 2015, no. 1 (22), pp. 35–38. (In Russian).
  • Kostyaev A.I. Territorial'naya differentsiatsiya sel'skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva: voprosy metodologii i teorii [Territorial differentiation of agricultural production: methodological and theoretical issues]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGUEF, 2006. 240 p.
  • Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. Inequality of socio-economic development of regions and cities of Russia in the 2000s: growth or decline? Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2013, no. 6, pp. 15–26. (In Russian).
  • Bufetova A.N. Interregional differences in the standard of living in Russia. Vestn. Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriya: Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki=Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economics Sciences, 2014, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 113–123. (In Russian).
  • Moroshkina M.V. Interregional differentiation of Russian regions: trends and prospects of convergence. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika=Theoretical and Applied Economics, 2018, no. 3, pp. 48–60. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8647.2018.3.18700. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18700 (In Russian).
  • Gubanova E.S., Kleshch V.S. Methods to evaluate uneven socio-economic development of a region. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory's Development, 2018, no. 6 (98), pp. 30–41. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2018.6.98.2 (In Russian).
  • Stec M.A., Filip P.B., Grzebyk M.J., Pierscieniak A. Socio-economic development in the EU member states – concept and classification. Economics of Engineering Decisions, 2014, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 504–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.5.6413
  • Mironenkov A.A. Hierarchical Pareto classification of the Russian regions by the population’s quality of life indicators. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 171–185. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.2.68.11 (In Russian).
  • Mirkin B.G., Orlov M.A. Metody mnogokriterial'noi stratifikatsii i ikh eksperimental'noe sravnenie [Methods of multi-criteria stratification and their experimental comparison]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013. 32 p.
  • Ward N., Atterton J., Kim T.Y., Lowe P., Phillipson J., Thompson N. Universities. The Knowledge Economy and ‘Neo-Endogenous Rural Development’. Centre for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series. 2005, no. 1, pp. 1–15. Available at: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/cre/publish/discussionpapers/pdfs/discussionpaper1.pdf
  • van der Ploeg J.D., Marsden T.K. Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development. Assen: The Netherlands: Van Gorcum. 2008. 262 p. Available at: http://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/11659
  • Guinjoan Е., Badia А., Tulla A.F. The new paradigm of rural development. Territorial considerations and reconceptualization using the “Rural Web”. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 2016, no. 71, pp. 495–500. DOI: 10.21138/bage.2279.
Еще
Статья научная