Conflicts in protected natural areas of the arctic region: identifying, analyzing and finding the solutions

Автор: Smirennikova Elena V., Ukhanova Anna V., Voronina Lyudmila V.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Environmental economics

Статья в выпуске: 3 (63) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The increased attention paid by the state and the public to the Russian Arctic in recent years has led to a new round of its economic development. Nevertheless, major features of the Arctic nature are its vulnerability and the difficulty of recovery after anthropogenic impacts. This fact, as well as the exceptional climatic, ecological and cultural significance of the nature of the Russian Arctic, predetermines the need for its careful protection and for preservation of its fragile ecological balance. The defining role in these processes belongs to protected natural areas (PNS). Our paper emphasizes that one of the main barriers to the development of the network of protected natural areas both in Russia as a whole and in its Arctic territories consists in numerous conflict situations and disputes related to the organization and existence of protected areas. In the framework of the study, we develop a universal algorithm for analyzing the conflicts related to the establishment and functioning of protected areas. The proposed algorithm was tested on the example of the Arkhangelsk Oblast - the largest region in the European part of the Russian Arctic. Using content analysis, systematization, expert survey and general scientific research methods, we identify 58 conflict situations in 35 currently functioning protected areas and in two protected areas that are planned to be created in the region; we classify the situations according to the parties, subject and phase of the conflict. On the basis of this work, we formulate a set of specific recommendations to address, prevent and reduce the number of conflicts in the protected areas of the Arkhangelsk Oblast.


Protected natural areas, conflict, arkhangelsk oblast, russian arctic

Короткий адрес:

IDR: 147224174   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.3.62.7

Список литературы Conflicts in protected natural areas of the arctic region: identifying, analyzing and finding the solutions

  • Khanzerova I. The Arctic - the promised land. Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet=Saint Petersburg University, 2016, no. 4, pp. 20-23. (In Russian).
  • Budyko M.I. Polar ice as a factor in climate formation. In: Klimat i zhizn' [Climate and Life]. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1971. Pp. 249-274. (In Russian).
  • Tishkov A.A. Development of geographical network of protected areas. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy=Geography and Natural Resources, 2017, no. 3, pp. 13-21. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21782/GIPR0206-1619-2017-3(13-21)
  • Tishkov A.A., Belonovskaya E.A., Titova S.V. Natural reserves of the South of European Russia as objects of tourism. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya turizma v Yuzhnom federal'nom okruge: sb. nauch. trudov [Problems and Prospects of Tourism Development in the Southern Federal District: Collection of Scientific Works]. Simferopol: Arial, 2017. Pp. 243-246. (In Russian).
  • Sobolev N.A. A Red List of natural ecological systems. In: Problemy izucheniya i sokhraneniya rastitel'nogo mira Vostochnoi Fenoskandii: sb. tez. [Problems of Study and Preservation of the Flora of Eastern Fennoscandia: Collection of Abstracts]. Apatity, 2015. Pp. 84-85. (In Russian).
  • Lapteva E.M., Deneva S.V., Kholopov Yu.V., Panyukov A.N. The role of protected areas in preserving the diversity of alluvial soils of the Komi Republic. In: Tezisy dokladov VII S"ezda pochvovedov im. V.V. Dokuchaeva i Vserossiiskoi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchnoi konferentsii "Pochvovedenie - prodovol'stvennoi i ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti strany" [Abstracts of V.V. Dokuchaev Seventh Congress of Soil Scientists and the all- Russian scientific conference "Soil science - food and environmental security of the country" with international participation]. Belgorod, 2016. Pp. 324-325. (In Russian).
  • Panchenko D.V., Tirronen K.F., Danilov P.I., Kutenkov S.A. The role of protected areas in preserving the forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus lonnb) in Karelia. In: Sbornik trudov mezhd. nauch.-prakt. konf. "Mezhdunarodnaya i mezhregional'naya sopryazhennost' okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii Evropeiskogo Severa" [Proceedings of the International Research-to-Practice Conference "International and Interregional Interconnection of Protected Natural Areas of the European North]. Petrozavodsk: Karel'skii nauchnyi tsentr RAN, 2017. Pp. 99-100. (In Russian).
  • Degteva S.V., Lapteva E.M. Biologicheskoe raznoobrazie osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii Respubliki Komi: monografiya [Biological Diversity of Protected Natural Areas of the Komi Republic: Monograph]. Syktyvkar: Komi nauchnyi tsentr UrO RAN, 2015. 200 p.
  • Lavrinenko I.A., Lavrinenko O.V., Nikolaeva N.M., Uvarov S.A. Osobo okhranyaemye prirodnye territorii Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Protected Natural Areas of Nenets Autonomous Okrug]. Arkhangelsk: Lotsiya. 2015. 80 p.
  • Dudley N., Hockings M., Stolton S. et al. Priorities for protected area research. Parks, 2018, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 35-50. Available at: ND.en
  • DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-1
  • Degteva S.V., Ponomarev V.I., Eisenman S.W., Dushenkov V. Striking the balance: challenges and perspectives for the protected areas network in northeastern European Russia. Ambio, 2015, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 473-490.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0636-x
  • Siitonen J., Penttilä R., Kotiranta H. Coarse woody debris, polyporous fungi and saproxylic insects in an old-growth spruce forest in Vodlozero National Park, Russian Karelia. Ecological Bulletins, 2001. vol. 49, pp. 231- 242.
  • Tikkanen O.P., Chernyakova I.A. Past human population history affects current forest landscape structure of Vodlozero National Park, Northwest Russia. Silva Fennica, 2014. vol. 48, no. 4, p. 1207.
  • DOI: 10.14214/sf.1207
  • Wendland K.J., Baumann M., Lewis D.J., Sieber A., Radeloff V.C. Protected Area Effectiveness in European Russia: A Post-Matching Panel Data Analysis. Land Economics, 2015. vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 149-168.
  • DOI: 10.3368/le.91.1.149
  • Elbakidze M., Angelstam P., Sobolev N. et al. Protected area as an indicator of ecological sustainability? A century of development in Europe's boreal forest. Ambio, 2013, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 201-214.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0375-1
  • Juvonen S.K., Kuhmonen A., Opdahl T. et al. Evaluation of the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region. Helsinki: Edita Prima Ltd., 2013. 314 p.
  • Kuhmonen A., Mikkola J., Storrank B., Lindholm T. (Eds.). Protected areas and high conservation value forests in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region - Sweden, Finland and Russia. Available at:
  • Kuznetsov M.P., Pegov S.A. Conflicts related to nature management in the area of Valdaysky National Park. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya= Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series, 2010, no. 4, pp. 77-85. (In Russian).
  • Grishina N.V. Psikhologiya konflikta [Psychology of Conflict]. 2nd edition. Saint Petersburg: Piter Press, 2008. 544 p.
  • Petrovskaya L.A. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sotsial'noi psikhologii [Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Social Psychology]. Moscow: Mosk. un-t, 1977. 168 p.
Статья научная