Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership - collaborative advantage

Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership - collaborative advantage

Автор: Polterovich Victor M.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Theoretical and methodological issues

Статья в выпуске: 3 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The first part of the paper showed that the group of seven European countries leading in the life satisfaction index (happiness index) significantly outperformed other Western nations, including the United States, in the development of economic and political institutions. The Seven includes Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. The second part examines what qualitative features of socio-economic and political mechanisms provide leadership. It is noted that attempts to explain this phenomenon by the low size of population and its homogeneity, as well as by the small area of these countries, are inadequate. The notion of collaborative advantages is introduced, understood as relatively more developed mechanisms of collaboration in the economic, social and political spheres. Based on three different classifications of types of capitalism and on an analysis of the history of countries of the Seven we show that they have reached the leading positions due to collaborative advantages. These countries are coordinated market economies, their economic systems are characterized as stakeholder capitalism, and their political systems are consensus democracies. The Seven of European Leaders carry out reforms aimed at improving collaboration mechanisms and, as a consequence, are less affected by the crisis of competitive institutions observed in Western societies. The presented results support the hypothesis that the strengthening of the role of collaboration mechanisms while reducing the importance of competitive mechanisms contributes to higher life satisfaction. The experience of the Seven is used by other developed European countries as well. The question of how our findings can be used in choosing a catching-up strategy is discussed.

Еще

Coordinated market economies, stakeholder capitalism, consensus democracies, collaboration, nordicization, reforms, catching-up development

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147238053

IDR: 147238053   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2

Список литературы Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership - collaborative advantage

  • Aerts R. (2010). Civil society or democracy? A Dutch paradox. BMGN-Low Countries Historical Review, 125 (2–3), 209–236.
  • Alouini O., Hubert P. (2012). Country size, economic performance and volatility. Documents de Travail de l’OFCE, 1–27.
  • Amor-Esteban V., Galindo-Villardon M.P., García-Sánchez I.M. (2019). A multivariate proposal for a national corporate social responsibility practices index (NCSRPI) for international settings. Social Indicators Research, 143(2), 525–560.
  • Avoyan E., Meijerink S. (2021). Cross-sector collaboration within Dutch flood risk governance: Historical analysis of external triggers. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 37(1), 24–47.
  • Batory A., Svensson S. (2020). Regulating collaboration: The legal framework of collaborative governance in ten European countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 780–789.
  • Bohle D., Greskovits B. (2007). The State, internationalization, and capitalist diversity in Eastern Europe. Competition and Change, 11(2), 89–115.
  • Brandenburger A.M., Nalebuff B.J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
  • Brandt F., Konstantinos G. (2016). Shareholders vs stakeholders capitalism. Comparative Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, 10. Available at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/fisch_2016/10
  • Daly M.C., Oswald A.J., Wilson D., Stephan W. (2011). Dark contrasts: The paradox of high rates of suicide in happy places. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(3), 435–442.
  • Elgström O., Delputte S. (2016). An end to Nordic exceptionalism? Europeanisation and Nordic development policies. European Politics and Society, 17(1), 28–41. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2015.1075765
  • Gjølberg M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.
  • Hall P.A., Gingerich D.W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 449–482.
  • Hall P.A., Soskice D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall P.A., Soskice D. (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hopmann D.N., Karlsen R. (2021). Elections and political communication in the Nordic countries. In: Skogerbø E., Ihlen Ø., Kristensen N.N., Nord L. (Eds.). Power, Communication, and Politics in the Nordic Countries. Gøteborg: Nordicom. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-11
  • Iqbal R., Todi P. (2015). The Nordic model: Existence, emergence and sustainability. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 336–351.
  • Jakobsen P.V. (2009). Small states, big influence: The overlooked Nordic influence on the civilian ESDP. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1), 81–102.
  • Jäntti M., Saari J., Vartiainen J. (2006). Growth and Equity in Finland. WIDER Discussion Paper 2006/06. Helsinki: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research.
  • Kirdina-Chandler S.G., Hall J. (2017). Cooperation versus competition in works of Russian evolutionists. Journal of Institutional Studies, 9(1), 6–26 (in Russian).
  • Klenk T., Reiter R. (2019). Post-new public management: Reform ideas and their application in the field of social services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1) 3–10.
  • Kübler D., Rochat P.E., Woo S.Y., van der Heiden N. (2020). Strengthen governability rather than deepen democracy: Why local governments introduce participatory governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 409–426.
  • Ladner A. (2005). Laymen and executives in Swiss local government. In: Berg R., Rao N. (Eds.). Transforming Political Leadership in Local Government. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lei D., Slocum J.W., Pitts R.A. (1997). Building cooperative advantage: Managing strategic alliances to promote organizational learning. Journal of World Business, 32(3), 203–223.
  • Lijphart A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Second edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Linder W., Mueller S. (2021). Swiss Democracy. Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. Springer Nature, Switzerland.
  • Lobanov M.M., Glinkina S.P. (2020). Varieties of capitalist relations in foreign emerging market countries: The problems of typology and research methodology. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika=St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 36(1), 7–26 (in Russian).
  • Long T. (2017). Small states, great power? Gaining influence through intrinsic, derivative, and collective power. International Studies Review, 19(2), 185–205.
  • Martela F., Greve B., Rothstein B., Saari J. (2020). The Nordic exceptionalism: What explains why the Nordic countries are constantly among the happiest in the world. In: Helliwell J.F., Layard R., Sachs J.D., De Neve J.E. (Eds.). World Happiness Report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
  • McLaughlin K., Osborne S., Ferlie E. (Eds.). (2002). The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge.
  • Pendergast P.M., Wadsworth T., Kubrin C.E. (2019). Suicide in happy places: Is there really a paradox? Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(1), 81–99.
  • Polterovich V.M. (2015). From social liberalism towards the philosophy of collaboration. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', 4, 41–64 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2016). Institutions of catching-up development (on the project of a new model for economic development of Russia). Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 5, 88–107 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy ekonomiki, 12 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2021a). Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy. Voprosy ekonomiki, 1, 52–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2021b) Collaborative hierarchies. Voprosy ekonomiki, 7, 31–48 (in Russian).
  • Polterovich V.M. (2022). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 1. The Seven of European leaders. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty. tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(2), 31–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.2 (in Russian).
  • Pratt J. (2008). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. The British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 119–137.
  • Rose A.K. (2006). Size really doesn’t matter: In search of a national scale effect. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20(4), 482–507.
  • Rothstein B., Uslaner E. (2005). All for one. Equality, corruption and social trust. World Politics, 58, 41–72.
  • Ryggvik H. (2015). A short history of the Norwegian oil industry: From protected national champions to internationally competitive multinationals. Business History Review, 89(1), 3–41.
  • Skouloudis A., Isaac D., Evaggelinos K. (2016). Revisiting the national corporate social responsibility index. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23, 61–70.
  • Soens T. (2013). Flood security in the Medieval and Early Modern North Sea Area: A question of entitlement? Environment and History, 19, 209–232.
  • Strand R., Freeman R.E. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 65–85.
  • Strand R., Freeman R.E., Hockerts K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1– 15.
  • Sunde J. (2021). The history of Nordic legal culture and court culture: The story of what should not have been, but still came to be. In: Ervo L. et al. (Eds.). Rethinking Nordic Courts. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
  • Suslov V.I., Basareva V.G. (2020). Economic development and public policy: Scandinavia and Siberia. Interekspo Geo-Sibir’, 3(1), 209–218 (in Russian).
  • Thijs N., Hammerschmid G., Palaric E. (2018). A Comparative Overview of Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in the EU28. Brussels: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion under the Contract VC/2016/0492 “Support for developing better country knowledge on public administration and institutional capacity building”.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©