Classification of non-political participation practices of urban youth: forms, motivation, barriers

Автор: Antonova Natalya L., Abramova Sofya B., Gurarii Anna D.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Social and economic development

Статья в выпуске: 1 т.15, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article explores civic (non-political) participation practices among young people, which are understood as voluntary, public, and altruistic individual or collective actions. They are viewed as a condition for allowing young people to exercise their right to the city and are aimed at transforming urban space. The role of citizens in modern urban centres is increasing; they are becoming not only users, but also co-authors. Local activities that transform the territory in which young people live lead to an increase in their self-esteem and confidence, the acquisition of soft skills, and the formation of norms of interpersonal interaction. This study's main aim is to identify types of youth civic participation in a large industrial city. Drawing on data from an online survey (quota sampling, n = 800) of young people in the large industrial city of Yekaterinburg (Russia) conducted at the end of 2020, we suggest a typology of civic participation practices. The types were identified through the experience of participation in activities aimed at exercising a right to the city, a willingness to collaborate with other people, the degree of the institutionalisation of civic practices, and motivation to participate or not participate in civic practices. The article argues for building a constructive dialogue with government authorities to meet the needs of young people in transforming urban space. Studying specific do-it-yourself urban design practices in different cities and territories to find the most successful models for potential replication may be a promising direction for further research.

Еще

City, right to the city, civic participation, urban youth

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147237314

IDR: 147237314

Список литературы Classification of non-political participation practices of urban youth: forms, motivation, barriers

  • Antonova N., Abramova S., Polyakova V. (2020). The right to the city: Daily practices of youth and participation in the production of urban space. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 384–403. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1597 (in Russian).
  • Arampatzi A., Nicholls W. (2012). The urban roots of anti-neoliberal social movements: The case of Athens, Greece. Environment and Planning, 44, 2591–2610. DOI: 10.1068/a44416.
  • Badescu G., Neller K. (2007). Explaining associational involvement. In Van Deth J.W., Montero J.R., Westholm A. (Eds.). Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Balkmar D., Summerton J. (2017). Contested mobilities: Politics, strategies and visions in Swedish bicycle activism. Applied Mobilities, 2(2), 151–165. DOI: 10.1080/23800127.2017.1293910.
  • Beksheneva A.A., Yagodka N.N. (2020). Political and non-political forms of citizen participation in public life in Russia. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie=RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 7(1), 25–35. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8313-2020-7-1-25-35 (in Russian).
  • Browning C.R., Soller B. (2014). Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 16(1), 165–196.
  • Certeau M. de (1990). L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. Folio essays.
  • Clary E.G., Snyder M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156–159. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00037
  • Clement K. (2015). Unlikely mobilisations: How ordinary Russian people become involved in collective action. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2(3–4), 211–240.
  • Crean H.F. (2012). Youth activity involvement, neighborhood adult support, individual decision making skills, and early adolescent delinquent
  • behaviors: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 175–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2012.04.003
  • David N., Buchanan A. (2020). Planning our future: Institutionalizing youth participation in local government planning efforts. Planning. Theory & Practice, 21(1), 9–38. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2019.1696981.
  • Demakova K., Makovetskaya S., Skryakova E. (2014). Non-political activism in Russia. Pro et Contra, May–August, 148–163. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProEtContra_63_148-163.pdf (accessed: December 10, 2021; in Russian).
  • Dombrovskaya A.Yu. (2020). Civil activism of youth in modern Russia: Features of its manifestation in online and offline environments. Vlast’=The Authority, 28(2), 51–58. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7134 (in Russian).
  • Ekman J., Amna E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
  • Evans P. (2002). Livable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Faehnle M., Mäenpää P., Blomberg J., Schulman H. (2017). Civic engagement 3:0 – Reconsidering the roles of citizens in city-making. The Finnish Journal of Urban Studies, 55(3). Available at: https://www.yss.fi/journal/civic-engagement-3-0-reconsidering-the-roles-of-citizens-in-city-making/ (accessed: April 25, 2021).
  • Finn D. (2014). Introduction to the special issue on DIY Urbanism. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), 331–332. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2014.959154
  • Fisher D., Campbell L., Svendsen E. (2012). The organizational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environmental Politics, 21(1), 26–48. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.643367
  • Gallay E., Pykett A., Smallwood M., Flanagan C. (2020). Urban youth preserving the environmental commons: Student learning in place-based stewardship education as citizen scientists. Sustain Earth, 3(3). 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s42055-020-00026-1
  • Ginwright Sh., Cammarota J. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 693–710. DOI: 10.1080/09518390701630833
  • Gordon D. (2014). Do-it-yourself urban design: The social practice of informal “improvement” through unauthorized alteration. City & Community, 13(1), 5–25. DOI: 10.1111/cico.12029.
  • Gribanova V. (2012). The essence of the concept “activity” in scientific literature. Vestnik Taganrogskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta. Seriya “Gumanitarnye nauki: pedagogika, psikhologiya, politologiya i sotsiologiya, ekonomika, pravo”. Spetsvypusk no. 1=Bulletin of the Taganrog State Pedagogical Institute. Ser. “Humanities: Pedagogy, Psychology, Political Science and Sociology, Economics, Law”. Special Issue, 1, 15–19 (in Russian).
  • Harvey D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
  • Hooghe M., Marien S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
  • Jacobs J. (1961). Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
  • Koroleva M., Chernova M. (2018). Urban activism: Management practices of authorities as resources and barriers for urban development projects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 93–101. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250001963-2 (in Russian).
  • Lefebvre H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Lefebvre H. (1996). Writings on Cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Lisovskiy V. (2000). Dukhovnyi mir i tsennostnye orientatsii molodezhi [Spiritual World and Value Orientations of the Youth of Russia]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP.
  • Mclaughlin D. (2019). How young people are healing the world: An activist reflects on the Tikkun youth project. In: Daniel Y. (Ed). Tikkun Beyond Borders: Connecting Youth Voices, Leading Change. Available at: https://windsor.scholarsportal.info/omp/index.php/digital-press/catalog/view/156/291/1467-1 (accessed: May 1, 2021).
  • Moskaleva S.M., Tykanova E.V. (2016). Social conditions of the performance of civic and expert groups aimed at the improvement of the quality of urban environment. Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii=Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, XIX(4)(87), 103–120 (in Russian).
  • Nakamura L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge.
  • Oser J., Hooghe M., Marien S. (2013). Is online participation distinct from offline participation? A latent class analysis of participation types and their stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 91–101. DOI: 10.1177/1065912912436695
  • Pancer M., Rose-Krasnor L., Loisell L. (2002). Youth conference as a context for engagement. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 47–64. DOI: 10.1002/yd.26
  • Purcell M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal. 58, 99–108.
  • Rogge N., Theesfeld I. (2018). Categorizing urban commons: Community gardens in the Rhine-Ruhr agglomeration, Germany. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 251–274. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.854.
  • Saito R. (2006). Beyond access and supply: Youth-led strategies to captivate young people’s interest in and demand for youth programs and opportunities. New Directions for Youth Development, 112, 57–74. DOI: 10.1002/yd.193
  • Schlozman K., Verba S., Brady H. (1999). Civic participation and the equality problem. In: Skocpol T., Fiorina M. (Eds). Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
  • Sedova N. (2014). Сivic activism in modern Russia: Forms, factors, and social base. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 2, 48–71. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2014.2.495 (in Russian).
  • Shchemeleva I.I. (2019). Social activity of the student youth: Factor and cluster analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 4, 133–141. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004594-6 (in Russian).
  • Soja E. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Suter P., Gmür M. (2018). Volunteer engagement in housing co-operatives: Civil society “en miniature”. Voluntas, 29, 770–789. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-9959-0
  • Trotsuk I.V., Sokhadze K.G. (2014). Social activity of the youth: Approaches to the assessment of forms, motives and factors in the contemporary Russian society. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya=RUDN Journal of Sociology, 4, 58–74 (in Russian).
  • Twigg J., Mosel I. (2017). Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Environment and Urbanization, 29(2), 443–458. DOI: 10.1177/0956247817721413
  • Van der Meer T., Te Grotenhuis M., Scheepers P.L. (2009). Three types of voluntary associations in comparative perspective: The importance of studying associational involvement through a typology of associations in 21 European countries. Journal of Civil Society, 5(3), 227–241. DOI: 10.1080/17448680903351743
  • Youniss J. et al. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(1), 121–148. DOI: 10.1111/1532-7795.00027
  • Zhelnina A. (2015). Creativity in the city: Reinterpreting the public space. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii=Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2(78), 45–59. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/folder/c3b8jtgfb6/direct/157650662.pdf (accessed: October 25, 2021; in Russian).
  • Zhuravlev O. (2017). Vad blev kvar av Bolotnajatorget? En nystart för den lokala aktivismen i Ryssland. Arkiv. Tidskrift för samhällsanalys, 7, 129–164. DOI: 10.13068/2000-6217.7.4.
Еще
Статья научная