Analyzing distribution effects of the federal budget transfers for the Far East

Автор: Isaev Atrem G.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 6 т.13, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article analyzes the economic consequences of federal redistributive transfers for the regions of the Far East on the basis of two-regional computable general equilibrium model. The model is based on the assumption that regional government aims at maximizing their total spending which is limited by the size of the region’s tax base. Migration, trade and federal transfers are the main sources of regional interconnection in the national economy. The authors calibrated the linearized version of the model on data of nine regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. The regions have significant structural and macroeconomic differences not only in such aggregates as average per capita consumption and wages, but also in terms of average per capita income and budget expenditures. The researchers have found that federal transfers have a negligible effect on the welfare of the regional households. However, they affect other variables, such as consumption, employment, price level, wages, regional taxes and government spending. An initial increase in the welfare level causes an in-migration of labor resources, and a new equilibrium is established at a lower price level and per capita income in the recipient region. Moreover, a decrease in prices for local products is observed for the South Zone of the Far Eastern Federal District (Primorsky and Khabarovsk Krais, the Amur Oblast), while for all other regions there is an opposite effect. The research has shown that the regions of the Far East are characterized by different reactions and may have opposite effects with respect to the state budgetary policy measures in relation to these regions.


Fiscal federalism, russian far east, public good, general equilibrium, household's welfare, government spending

Короткий адрес:

IDR: 147225511   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.6.72.5

Список литературы Analyzing distribution effects of the federal budget transfers for the Far East

  • Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 416–424.
  • Isaev A.G. Effects of interregional redistribution of financial resources: A general equilibrium approach. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 2019, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 618–630. DOI: 10.17059/2019-2-23 (in Russian).
  • Minakir P.A., Isaev A.G., Dem’yanenko A.N., Prokapalo O.M. Economic macroregions: An integration phenomenon or a political geographic rationale? Far Eastern Russia case. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 66–99.DOI: (in Russian).
  • Groenewold N., Hagger A. An Analysis of the Effects of Fiscal Equalization in a Two-Region Simulation Model. The University of Western Australia. Discussion Paper. 2005. Available at:
  • Avetisian I.A. Management of inter-budgetary relations in Russia is an integral part of budget management. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 2018, no. 1 (41), pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.15838/tdi/2018.1.41.3 (in Russian).
  • Idrisov Sh.A., Somoev R.G. Fiscal Federalism: Russian and foreign models. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal=Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2016, no. 4 (48), pp. 507–520 (in Russian).
  • Tatarkin A.I., Tatarkin D.A. Russian fiscal federalism in the conditions of economic instability. Federalizm=Federalism, 2016, no. 3 (83), pp. 9–26 (in Russian).
  • Bukhval’d E.M., Valentik O.N. Federalism as an institutional priority of the spatial development strategy for Russia. Regional’naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii=Regional Economy. South of Russia, 2018, no. 4, pp. 33–43. DOI: 10.15688/re.volsu.2018.4.3 (in Russian).
  • Rossiiskii Dal’nii Vostok na puti v budushchee [Russian Far East on the Way to the Future]. Ed. by P.A. Minakir. Economic Research Institute of Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Khabarovsk: IEI DVO RAN, 2017. 395 p.
  • Leonov S.N. Problems of budgetary sphere of the Far Eastern constituent entities of the Federation. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 2020, no. 1 (105), pp. 93–108. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.1.105.7 (in Russian).
  • Minakir P.A. Far Eastern institutional novations: Imitation of a new stage. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–17. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.007-017 (in Russian).
  • Kudrin A., Deryugin A. Subnational budget rules: Foreign and Russian experience. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic Policy, 2018, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 8–35. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-1-01 (in Russian).
  • Boadway R., Flatters F. Efficiency and equalization payments in a federal system of government: A synthesis and extension of recent results. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1982, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 613–633.
  • Bradford D., Oates W. Towards a predictive theory of intergovernmental grants. The American Economic Review, 1971, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 440–448.
  • Roback J. Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 1982, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 1257–1278.
  • Krumm R. Regional wage differentials, fluctuations in labor demand, and migration. International Regional Science Review, 1983, vol. 8, no. 1, pp.23–45.
  • Mansoorian A, Myers R. Attachment to Home and Efficient Purchases of Population in a Fiscal Externality Economy. University of Western Ontario. Research Report 9010. 1990. Available at:
  • Courant P., Deardorf A. Amenities, nontraded goods, and the trade of lumpy countries. Journal of Urban Economics, 1993, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 299–317.
  • Groenewold N., Hagger A., Madden J. The Efficiency of Federal Inter-Regional Transfers Under a Regime of Politically-Maximizing Regional Governments. The University of Western Australia. Discussion Paper. 2002. Available at:
  • Devarajan S., Lewis J., Robinson S. Policy lessons from trade-focused, two-sector models. Journal of Policy Modeling, 1990, vol.12, no. 4, pp. 625–657.
Статья научная